Deep Learning Diagnostic and Risk-stratification for IPF and COPD (DeepBreath)

April 10, 2024 updated by: Pediatric Clinical Research Platform

Deep Learning Diagnostic and Risk-stratification for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Digital Lung Auscultations

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are severe, progressive, irreversibly incapacitating pulmonary disorders with modest response to therapeutic interventions and poor prognosis. Prompt and accurate diagnosis is important to enable patients to receive appropriate care at the earliest possible stage to delay disease progression and prolong survival.

Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted digital lung auscultation could constitute an alternative to conventional subjective operator-related auscultation to accurately and earlier diagnose these diseases. Moreover, lung ultrasound (LUS), a relevant gold standard for lung pathology, could also benefit from automation by deep learning.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aim: To develop and determine the predictive power of an AI (deep learning) algorithm in identifying the acoustic and LUS signatures of IPF, NSIP and COPD in an adult population and discriminating them from age-matched, never smoker, control subjects with normal lung function.

Methodology: A single-center, prospective, population-based case-control study that will be carried out in subjects with IPF, NSIP and COPD. A total of 120 consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years and meeting IPF, NSIP or COPD international criteria, and 40 age-matched controls, will be recruited in a Swiss pulmonology outpatient clinic with a total of approximately 7000 specialized consultations per year, starting from August 2022.

At inclusion, demographic and clinical data will be collected. Additionally, lung auscultation will be recorded with a digital stethoscope and LUS performed. A deep learning algorithm (DeepBreath) using various deep learning networks with aggregation strategies will be trained on these audio recordings and lung images to derive an automated prediction of diagnostic (i.e., positive vs negative) and risk stratification categories (mild to severe).

Secondary outcomes will be to measures the association of analysed lung sounds with clinical, functional and radiological characteristics of IPF, NSIP and COPD diagnosis. Patients' quality of life will be measured with the standardized dedicated King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (K-BILD) and the COPD assessment test (CAT) questionnaires.

Expected results: This study seeks to explore the synergistic value of several point-of-care-tests for the detection and differential diagnosis of ILD and COPD as well as estimate severity to better guide care management in adults

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Wallis
      • Sion, Wallis, Switzerland, 1951
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier du Valais Romand
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pierre-Olivier Bridevaux, Prof.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mary-Anne Hartley, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Delphine S. Courvoisier, Prof.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Constance Barazzone-Argiroffo, Prof.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Marlène Salamin, RN
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Alain Gervaix, Prof.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Johan N. Siebert, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Cases: 120 patients (80 ILD [40 IPF, 40 NSIP], 40 COPD) will be recruited from an outpatient pulmonology clinic in Switzerland in daily clinical practice on the day of intervention.

Probable and definitive IPF diagnosis will be made according to the Fleischner Society Consensus, NSIP diagnosis with the American Thoracic Society classification, and COPD with the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease criteria.

Controls: 40 age-matched (+/- 2.5 years) never smokers with normal lung function (spirometry, lung volume and transfer factor for carbon monoxide) followed in the pulmonology outpatient clinic with similar quality of electronic medical records but for diseases other than the outcome of interest (see eligibility criteria) will serve as the 1:1 control group.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent
  • age > 18 years old.
  • patients with already-diagnosed IPF (group 1) prior to the consultation (index) date.
  • patients with already-diagnosed NSIP (group 2) prior to the consultation (index) date.
  • patients with already-diagnosed COPD (group 3) prior to the consultation (index) date.
  • Control subjects must be followed-up at the pulmonology outpatient clinic for:

    1. obstructive sleep apnoea.
    2. occupational lung diseases (miners, chemical workers, etc.).
    3. pulmonary nodules (considered benign after 2 years).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients who cannot be mobilized for posterior auscultation.
  • patients known for severe cardiovascular disease with pulmonary repercussion.
  • patients known for a concurrent, acute, infectious pulmonary disease (e.g., pneumonia, bronchitis).
  • patients known for asthma.
  • patients known or suspected of immunodeficiency, alpha-1-antitrypsin deficit, and or under immunotherapy.
  • patients with physical inability to follow procedures.
  • patients with inability to give informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
IPF patients (group 1)
Consenting adult patients >18 years old with with already-diagnosed IPF
Digital lung auscultation with the Eko core digital stethoscope (Eko Devices, Inc., CA, USA).
Lung ultrasonography
Impact of the diseases on subjects' health-related quality of life measured with standardized questionnaires (K-BILD, CAT)
Spirometry, body-plethysmographic parameters and lung diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide will be measured.
NSIP patients (group 2)
Consenting adult patients >18 years old with with already-diagnosed non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP)
Digital lung auscultation with the Eko core digital stethoscope (Eko Devices, Inc., CA, USA).
Lung ultrasonography
Impact of the diseases on subjects' health-related quality of life measured with standardized questionnaires (K-BILD, CAT)
Spirometry, body-plethysmographic parameters and lung diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide will be measured.
COPD patients (group 3)
Consenting adult patients >18 years old with with already-diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
Digital lung auscultation with the Eko core digital stethoscope (Eko Devices, Inc., CA, USA).
Lung ultrasonography
Impact of the diseases on subjects' health-related quality of life measured with standardized questionnaires (K-BILD, CAT)
Spirometry, body-plethysmographic parameters and lung diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide will be measured.
Control subjects (group 4)

Consenting age-matched (+/- 2.5 years) never smokers patients with normal lung function (spirometry, lung volume and Transfer Factor for Carbon Monoxide (TLCO)) followed in the pulmonology outpatient clinic with similar quality of electronic medical records but for diseases other than the outcome of interest, namely:

  1. patients with obstructive sleep apnea.
  2. patients followed-up for occupational lung diseases (miners, chemical workers, etc.).
  3. patients followed-up for pulmonary nodules (considered benign after 2 years).
Digital lung auscultation with the Eko core digital stethoscope (Eko Devices, Inc., CA, USA).
Lung ultrasonography
Impact of the diseases on subjects' health-related quality of life measured with standardized questionnaires (K-BILD, CAT)
Spirometry, body-plethysmographic parameters and lung diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide will be measured.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To differentiate ILD from control subjects based on digital lung sounds recordings and LUS.
Time Frame: During lung auscultation (10 minutes). Each patient will provide 10 recordings of 30 seconds. LUS images and 5 second video clips of each anatomic region (10 regions represented).

To determine the predictive performance of the AI algorithm-evaluated lung auscultation and LUS in the identification and risk stratification of ILD signatures from control subjects described in terms of descriptive statistics, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratios (95% confidence intervals).

Digital lung sounds will be transformed to Mel Frequency Cepstrum Coefficients. Several data augmentation techniques will be explored. The effect of each pre-processing method will be tested. The best performing approach according to sensitivity and specificity will be reported. This dataset will then be fed into a various deep learning networks with aggregation strategies for binary classification into positive vs negative for diagnostic results for:

  • ILD or control subjects
  • ILD or COPD
  • (If ILD+) IPF or NSIP

The same prediction will also be made using LUS images.

During lung auscultation (10 minutes). Each patient will provide 10 recordings of 30 seconds. LUS images and 5 second video clips of each anatomic region (10 regions represented).
Predictive performance of the DeepBreath algorithm to stratify ILD severity based on human digital lung sounds recordings and LUS (i.e. physiological parameters) compared to grading scales.
Time Frame: During lung auscultation (10 minutes). Each patient will provide 10 recordings of 30 seconds. LUS images and 5 second video clips of each anatomic region (10 regions represented).

To determine the ILD clinical severity predictive performance of the DeepBreath algorithm based on human digital lung sounds recordings and LUS, risk stratification will use multiclass or regression according to grading scales obtained from:

  • K-BILD and CAT impact of life questionnaire.
  • Lung function tests (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 sec, Forced vital capacity, Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 sec/Forced vital capacity, Total lung capacity, functional respiratory capacity, Transfer capacity for carbon monoxide, Alveolar Volume).
  • High-Resolution Computed Tomography (severity markers that will be used are: traction bronchiectasis, presence of honeycombing, ground glass opacities, reticulation, emphysema. Chest CT-scans will be reviewed independently by two radiologists blinded to each other).
During lung auscultation (10 minutes). Each patient will provide 10 recordings of 30 seconds. LUS images and 5 second video clips of each anatomic region (10 regions represented).
Performance of the DeepBreath algorithm to subcategorize ILD by discriminating digital lung sounds recordings and LUS (i.e. physiological parameters).
Time Frame: During lung auscultation (10 minutes). Each patient will provide 10 recordings of 30 seconds. LUS images and 5 second video clips of each anatomic region (10 regions represented).

The performance of the DeepBreath algorithm to determine the subcategories of ILD such as IPF and NSIP based on digital lungs sounds and LUS according to gold standard diagnosis:

  • IPF follows the Fleischner Society Consensus criteria.
  • NSIP diagnosis follows the American Thoracic Society classification.
During lung auscultation (10 minutes). Each patient will provide 10 recordings of 30 seconds. LUS images and 5 second video clips of each anatomic region (10 regions represented).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance of human expert-identified acoustic signatures.
Time Frame: During the data analysis period (i.e., after the 60-minute study intervention period).
Comparison of the predictive performance of human expert-identified acoustic signatures in the predictive tasks described above in the primary outcomes (Kappa coefficient).
During the data analysis period (i.e., after the 60-minute study intervention period).
Agreement of human labels with objectively clustered pathological sounds by machine learning.
Time Frame: During the data analysis period (i.e., after the 60-minute study intervention period).
To quantify the agreement of human labels with objectively clustered pathological sounds by machine learning (ie, the DeepBreath AI algorithm).
During the data analysis period (i.e., after the 60-minute study intervention period).
Diagnostic performance of DeepBreath to detect crackles in IPF patients.
Time Frame: During the data analysis period (i.e., after the 60-minute study intervention period).
Diagnostic performance of the AI algorithm (DeepBreath) trained to detect crackles in IPF patients.
During the data analysis period (i.e., after the 60-minute study intervention period).
To test whether performance of DeepBreath could be improved using clinical features (i.e., signs, respiratory symptoms, demographics, medical history and basic paraclinical tests).
Time Frame: During the data analysis period (i.e., after the 60-minute study intervention period)
To explore the utility of adding clinical data collected at enrolment including demographic information (age and sex), several binary clinical symptoms (respiratory symptoms), medical history and basic paraclinical tests to improve the accuracy of the DeepBreath algorithm in detecting IPF from control subjects or COPD. Clinical data will be explored for their predictive capacity in the above tasks and added to the breath sound analysis either as an Support vector machine or in conditional feature extraction upstream of the neural network.
During the data analysis period (i.e., after the 60-minute study intervention period)
K-BILD
Time Frame: Baseline

King's brief Interstitial Lung Disease Health Status: the K-BILD health status questionnaire is a 15 item validated, self-completed heath status questionnaire. It has three domains: breathlessness and activities, psychological and chest symptoms. The K-BILD domain and total score ranges are 0-100, with the higher scores corresponding with better health-related quality of life.

This questionnaire will be used to assess the Impact of ILD on subjects' health-related quality of life. It will take about 3 minutes to complete this questionnaire.

Baseline
CAT
Time Frame: Baseline

COPD assessment test: the CAT health status questionnaire is a 8 item validated, self-completed heath status questionnaire. The total CAT score ranges from 0 to 40 where 0 represents no symptoms and 40 very bad symptoms.

This questionnaire will be used to assess the Impact of COPD on subjects' health-related quality of life. It will take about 3 minutes to complete this questionnaire.

Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pierre-Olivier Bridevaux, Prof., Hôpital du Valais, Switzerland
  • Study Director: Johan N. Siebert, MD, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 6, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All pertinent data generated or analysed during this study will be included in the published articles (and supplementary information files). An anonymous copy of the final (anonymized) datasets (but not digitized lung sounds) used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the corresponding author (see access criteria).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available beginning 6 months and ending 5 years following article publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

De-identified data will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request upon approval of a proposal and with a signed data access agreement. Data will be made available for a specified research purpose to qualified external researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved by their institutional review board. The request proposal must include a statistician.

There are no plans to share the digitized lung sounds collected during the study procedure.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Clinical Trials on Lung auscultation

Subscribe