Prospective Study of Video-assisted Rib Planting in Chest Wall Stabilization

April 15, 2022 updated by: Weigang Zhao

The purpose of this study is to compare the advantages and disadvantages of video-assisted rib planting and traditional internal fixation of rib fractures in chest wall stabilization.

The investigators design a new surgical method of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for rib fractures, evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the new surgical techniques with a prospective study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China
        • Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

-≥3 unilateral rib displacement fractures

  • 18-70 years old
  • ASA score I-II
  • Preoperative arterial oxygen partial pressure >60mmHg
  • Carbon dioxide partial pressure <50mmHg

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The distance from the broken end of the posterior rib fracture to the spine is less than 2cm
  • Airway stenosis
  • Abnormal coagulation system
  • History of peptic ulcer or bleeding
  • History of allergy to anesthesia related drugs
  • History of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary emphysema
  • Pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: video-assisted rib planting
Give the patient intercostal nerve block and laryngeal mask anesthesia, after that, put the patient in lateral position. Make a 4-6cm posterolateral incision along the lower edge of the scapula,sever latissimus dorsi and serratus anterior and reach the rib surface. Lift the scapula with the abdominal retractor (or xiphoid retractor), Free adhesion tissue inside the scapula and put in the thoracoscopic lens. Free the tissue of the upper and lower edges of the ribs carefully, reset ribs and insert rib plate, which is fixed by 90° electric drill and locking screw.
Other Names:
  • video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for rib fractures

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The pain score after operation
Time Frame: 6 hours after operation

The investigators evaluate and record the patients' pain score after operation by visual analog scale (VAS),which is used to evaluate pain scores 6h,12h,and 24h after the operation.

0-10 is used to represent different degrees of pain, 0 is painless and 10 is severe pain. The grading criteria of pain were: 0: no pain; 1-3: mild pain; 4-6: moderate pain; 7-10: severe pain.

6 hours after operation
The pain score after operation
Time Frame: 12 hours after operation

The investigators evaluate and record the patients' pain score after operation by visual analog scale (VAS).

0-10 is used to represent different degrees of pain, 0 is painless and 10 is severe pain. The grading criteria of pain were: 0: no pain; 1-3: mild pain; 4-6: moderate pain; 7-10: severe pain.

12 hours after operation
The pain score after operation
Time Frame: 24 hours after operation

The investigators evaluate and record the patients' pain score after operation by visual analog scale (VAS).

0-10 is used to represent different degrees of pain, 0 is painless and 10 is severe pain. The grading criteria of pain were: 0: no pain; 1-3: mild pain; 4-6: moderate pain; 7-10: severe pain.

24 hours after operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The postoperative drainage
Time Frame: 7 days at most

The investigators record the postoperative drainage of patients.The drainage of chest catheter or negative pressure ball was recorded by the nurse every day after surgery.

Less postoperative drainage means faster recovery and shorter discharge times.

7 days at most

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The operation time
Time Frame: During surgery
The investigators record patients' operation time duration.
During surgery
The length of incision
Time Frame: During surgery
The investigators record the length of operative incision.
During surgery
The intraoperative bleeding
Time Frame: During surgery
The investigators record the intraoperative bleeding of patients.
During surgery
The treatment costs
Time Frame: from the date of hospitalization to the date of leave hospital,assessed up to 100 months

The investigators record the treatment costs and calculate per capita treatment costs of patients,which is recorded and counted at the time of discharge.

Total treatment costs include hospitalization, treatment, surgery, medications, and other related expenses.

from the date of hospitalization to the date of leave hospital,assessed up to 100 months
Days of stay hospital
Time Frame: from the date of hospitalization to the date of leave hospital,assessed up to 100 months
Days of stay hospital
from the date of hospitalization to the date of leave hospital,assessed up to 100 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Weigang Zhao, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 22, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 6, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rib Fractures

Clinical Trials on video-assisted rib planting

Subscribe