Thromboelastographic Methods in Deciding Therapy on Moderate to Severe COVID-19 Patients

April 21, 2022 updated by: Andi Ade Wijaya Ramlan, Indonesia University

The Role of Thromboelastographic Methods in Deciding Therapy on Moderate to Severe COVID-19

This study is a prospective observational study that compares the anticoagulant therapy decision time among moderate and severe COVID-19 patients whose coagulation profiles were tested with thromboelastography (TEG) to those with a standard coagulation profile laboratory examination.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A prospective observational study was conducted among moderate to severe COVID-19 patients in the High Care Unit and Intensive Care Unit at Kiara Ultimate, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Indonesia. We consecutively recruited 100 moderate and severe COVID-19 patients in the high and intensive care units.

Baseline characteristic data collection was carried out when the patient was admitted to the ICU or HCU. Venous blood was taken by nurses within 30 min of admission. The samples were sent to the centralized hospital laboratory for a standard hemostasis panel which consisted of platelets, PT/APTT, fibrinogen, and D-dimer. The hospital used Sysmex® CS-2500 and 5100 (Sysmex Corp., Japan) for coagulation tests by using plasma derived from centrifuged whole blood samples. Bedside TEG examination was done by using TEG 5000 Hemostasis Analyzer (Haemonetics Corp., USA) with 2.5 ml of a whole blood sample. Samples of patients with heparin thromboprophylaxis were given heparinase, which binds to heparin so that the coagulation profile can be assessed. Except for TEG, all patients received equal diagnostic tests and treatment, including anticoagulant therapy, as indicated according to the national guideline. A trained doctor from the research team recorded time from blood samples taken until the coagulation panel or TEG results were obtained. Test result timestamp, anticoagulation decision timestamp, mortality, and length of stay in higher care were objectively retrieved through online medical records.

We compared the result turnaround time, time to decision of anticoagulant therapy, and clinical outcomes (length of stay and 30-day mortality) between those who had TEG examination in addition to standard coagulation profile examination (thrombocyte count, PT, APTT, D-dimer, and fibrinogen) and those who had a standard coagulation profile laboratory examination only.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • DKI Jakarta
      • Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia, 10430
        • Cipto Mangunkusumo Cental National Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population was patients who had confirmed COVID-19 and underwent treatment at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital from October 2020 to March 2021. Subjects were eligible if they were adults (aged >18 years) who had positive SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab examination with moderate to severe clinical symptoms.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Confirmed COVID-19 (Positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test), 3. Moderate or severe symptoms (We defined moderate COVID-19 as patients with clinical signs of pneumonia with SpO2 >93% in room air and severe COVID-19 as pneumonia with SpO2 ≤93% in room air or ventilator support requirement), and 4. The family signed the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of blood clotting disorders (eg, hemophilia and Von Willebrand's disease),
  2. Have contraindications to the administration of anticoagulants, for example:

    1. Platelet count < 25,000
    2. Has bleeding manifestations
    3. History of heparin allergy or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
  3. Pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Thromboelastographic Methods
Patients whose coagulation profile were done by using a thromboelastography in addition to standard coagulation profile laboratory examination (thrombocyte count, PT, APTT, D-dimer, Fibrinogen)
Thromboelastography was done by using TEG 5000 Hemostasis Analyzer (Haemonetics Corp., USA)
Other Names:
  • TEG 5000 Hemostasis Analyzer (Haemonetics Corp., USA)
Standard coagulation profile laboratory examination (platelets, PT/APTT, fibrinogen, and D-dimer) was performed by using Sysmex® CS-2500 and 5100 (Sysmex Corp., Japan)
Standard coagulation profile laboratory examination
Patients whose coagulation profile were done by using a standard coagulation profile laboratory examination (thrombocyte count, PT, APTT, D-dimer, Fibrinogen)
Standard coagulation profile laboratory examination (platelets, PT/APTT, fibrinogen, and D-dimer) was performed by using Sysmex® CS-2500 and 5100 (Sysmex Corp., Japan)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to anticoagulant therapy decision
Time Frame: First day of admission in ICU/HCU
Calculation of the time (minutes) required from blood sample was taken until the decision on anticoagulant therapy made by the supervisors
First day of admission in ICU/HCU

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Result turnaround time
Time Frame: First day of admission in ICU/HCU
Calculation of the time (minutes) required from blood sample was taken until the examination result was done
First day of admission in ICU/HCU
Length of stay in higher care
Time Frame: During hospitalization
Length of stay in intensive care unit and/or high care unit during admission
During hospitalization
Mortality
Time Frame: 30 days after hospital admission
Death within 30 days after admission to the intensive care unit and/or high care unit
30 days after hospital admission

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andi Ade Wijaya Ramlan, MD, PhD, Indonesia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 9, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Clinical Trials on Thromboelastography

Subscribe