Post Marketing Clinical Follow up Study to Evaluate the Performance and Safety of ORTHIX PLUS

April 20, 2022 updated by: Yooyoung Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Post Marketing Clinical Follow up Study to Evaluate the Performance and Safety of ORTHIX PLUS for Pain Relief in Patients Suffering From Osteoarthritis or Degenerative Joint Diseases

This trial is a post marketing clinical follow up study, aiming to evaluate the performance and safety of ORTHIX PLUS for pain relief in patients suffering from osteoarthritis or degenerative joint diseases.

The study will involve 54 subjects, who will be enrolled in 2 centers in Turkey. The primary objective is to evaluate the overall performance of ORTHIX PLUS in providing relief in patients suffering from painful knee ostearthritis or degenerative joint diseases when used according to indications for use.

The first secondary objective is to evaluate the overall performance of ORTHIX PLUS in providing relief when used according to indications for use, at different time points. The other secondary objective is to evaluate the overall safety during the study period.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Design:

Open, non-randomised, non-comparative, single group assignment, multicentre study.

Chronogram of visits:

The study foresees the following visits per patient:

Visit 1 day -3 to day -1: Screening. Visit 2 day 0: Baseline visit (1st injection). Visit 3 day 7 (± 1 day): Follow up visit and, 2nd injection. Visit 4 day 14 (± 2 days): Follow up visit and, 3rd injection. Visit 5 day 21 (± 2 days): Follow up visit. Visit 6 day 56 (± 2 days): Follow up visit. Visit 7 day 98 (± 2 days): Follow up visit. Visit 8 day 194 (± 4 days): Final visit.

Patient enrollment and allocation:

After informed consent signature, the patient is considered enrolled. Once the eligibility is established according to inclusion/exclusion criteria the patient will receive a unique patient code and will be allocated to ORTHIX PLUS® (the tested medical device). The Investigator must also complete a patient screening log, which reports on all patients who were seen to determine eligibility for inclusion in the study.

Statistical Analysis:

The protocol outlines that a two-sided p-value of 0.05 or less will be used to declare statistical significance for all analyses. Similarly, all confidence intervals will be calculated at the 95% level.

No adjustment for multiplicity will be made to adjust type 1 error rate for secondary endpoints. If necessary, relevant results from other studies already reported in the literature will be considered in the interpretation of results.

The final analysis will be completed after all patients have been exited the study, all queries resolved, and the database have been locked.

If a patient is missing information for one or more variables, the missing data will not be replaced. Quantitative variables (i.e., demographic) if normally distributed will be described through media, standard deviation (SD); variables non-normally distributed will be described using median and range of interquartile.

Considering this clinical trial's design as a longitudinal cohort study, the focus of the performed statistical assessments will be the longitudinal (statistical) analysis.

Primary endpoint, change in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score(KOOS) pain sub-scale score from baseline to 14 weeks visit, will be analysed by performing a Student's t-test for paired data, or a Wilcoxon signed rank test if major deviations from former's test assumptions are recorded. As no missing data imputation on the primary outcome is planned, if such cases arise, a Linear Mixed Model analysis will be performed, to make use of the complete ITT(Intention to treat) population.

Secondary endpoints, all continuous variables in nature, will be assessed by performing ANOVA for repeated measures tests, or ANCOVA for repeated measures tests (if considering covariates like age, sex, BMI, etc.), assuming completeness of data (no missing data). If missingness of data drastically reduces the sample size (e.g., > 5% of patients will be eliminated), a robust statistical analysis method will be employed instead. Such a method, Linear Mixed Models analysis, has the main advantage of making use of the complete ITT population.

The safety analysis will be done on the ITT population.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

54

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients from the two Turkish primary care clinics

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients older than 18 years old(inlcusive≥18years).
  • Men or women.
  • Patients suffering from painful chronic idiopathic symptomatic degenerative joint diseases(clinical evidence) OR knee osteoarthritis (as defined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria); for patients with osteoarthritis at both knees, only the most painful one will be included in the study.
  • VAS knee pain≥40mm at screening and 30 days before.
  • Patients willing and able to comply with study terms.
  • Patients willing to discontinue all other degenerative joint diseases or knee osteoarthritis treatments.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients that are unable or unwilling to provide informed consent and/or patients participating in a concurrent clinical trial and/or patients that have participated in a similar clinical trial within the last 30 days.
  • Patients with known hypersensitivity to any components of investigational product.
  • Patients with infected or severely inflamed joints
  • Patients with skin diseases or infections in the area of the injection site.
  • Patients with hepatic failure or history thereof.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
KOOS for Pain at 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks

• Functional assessment of HYALEXO® by KOOS (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score) for Pain subscale at 12 weeks after the last administration of the investigational product, compared to the baseline.

This was the endpoint used for the sample size calculation.

12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
KOOS for Symptoms, Activity of Daily Living, Sport and Recreation and knee related Quality of life
Time Frame: 1,6,12 weeks and 6 months
Functional Assessment of HYALEXO® by KOOS for other Symptoms, Activity of Daily Living (ADL), Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec) function and knee related Quality of life (QoL) at 1, 6, 12 weeks and 6 months after the last administration of the investigational product, compared to baseline
1,6,12 weeks and 6 months
KOOS for Pain at 1, 6 weeks and 6 months
Time Frame: 1, 6 weeks and 6 months
Functional Assessment of HYALEXO® by KOOS for Pain subscale at 1, 6 weeks and 6 months after the last administration of the investigational product, compared to baseline.
1, 6 weeks and 6 months
Weight-bearing pain using a Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)
Time Frame: 1,6,12 weeks and 6 months
Changes in the weight-bearing pain using a Visual Analogue Scale (100 mm - VAS) at 1, 6, 12 weeks and 6 months after the last administration, compared to the baseline.
1,6,12 weeks and 6 months
Changes is rest pain(VAS)
Time Frame: 1,6,12 weeks and 6 months
Changes in the rest pain (100 mm - VAS) at 1, 6, 12 weeks and 6 months after the last administration, compared to the baseline.
1,6,12 weeks and 6 months
Changes in motion pain(VAS)
Time Frame: 1,6,12 weeks and 6 months
Changes in the motion pain (pain after 15 m walk) (100 mm - VAS) at 1, 6, 12 weeks and 6 months after the last administration, compared to the baseline.
1,6,12 weeks and 6 months
Global Pain Assessment
Time Frame: 1,6,12 weeks and 6 months
Patient Global Pain Assessment (100 mm - VAS) at 1, 6, 12 weeks and 6 months after the last administration, compared to the baseline.
1,6,12 weeks and 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary Safety endpoints
Time Frame: baseline(day0), all follow up visit(day7,14,21,56,98)
Safety checklist for local reactions at the injection site (i.e. discomfort, transient pain) at baseline and at all follow up visits
baseline(day0), all follow up visit(day7,14,21,56,98)
Secondary Safety endpoints
Time Frame: all visit(screening, baseline, day7,14,21,56,98,194)
AE/ADE/SAE/SADE/USADE/DD searching and assessment at all visits
all visit(screening, baseline, day7,14,21,56,98,194)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yüksel Ersoy, Dr, İnönü University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Principal Investigator: Serpil Tuna, Dr, AKDENİZ University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

July 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • YYDATP-PMCF-TR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee

Subscribe