Suicide Intervention for Alaska Native Youth (BeWel)

February 13, 2024 updated by: RAND

Comparative Effectiveness of Two Culturally-Centered Suicide Interventions for Alaska Native Youth

Two interventions will be delivered virtually to American Indian/Alaska Native youth who have been hospitalized with suicidal attempt, suicidal ideation, or associated risk behaviors, including alcohol-related injury.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial whereby Alaska Native (AN) youth who are hospitalized for suicide risk will be randomly assigned to either Qungasvik/Tools for Life or Tools for Life + Motivational Interviewing Social Network (MISN) intervention after their baseline survey, and followed up at 3-, 6-, and 12 months. All youth will receive Tools for Life and two 30-minute virtual follow-up visits (at 2- and 6-weeks post intervention) focused on connectivity to culture and obtaining support from intergenerational social networks in their home communities. Half of the youth will also receive MISN in addition to Tools for Life. Both interventions will be delivered virtually by a wellness team comprised of Alaska Native community behavioral health aides, prevention specialists and/or Elders who function in their communities as natural healers.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

370

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Elizabeth J D'Amico, PhD
  • Phone Number: 6487 3103930411
  • Email: damico@rand.org

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Alaska
      • Bethel, Alaska, United States, 99559
        • Recruiting
        • Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation
        • Contact:
          • Cynthia Nation
      • Fairbanks, Alaska, United States, 99559
        • Recruiting
        • Tanana Chiefs Conference
        • Contact:
          • Cynthia Nation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 24 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Self-identify as Alaska Native youth
  • Between the ages of 14 and 24
  • Admitted to the hospital for suicide attempt, ideation, or associated risk behaviors including alcohol-related injury or acute intoxication

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Tools for Life
All youth will receive the Tools for Life (Qungasvik) intervention. Tools for Life is an evidence-based, community-developed intervention focused on providing protective cultural experiences for Alaska Native youth to address suicide risk and alcohol use.
Tools for Life focuses on empowering youth to learn more about their culture and their identity.
Active Comparator: Tools for Life + Motivational Interviewing Social Network intervention (MISN)
Half of the youth will will also receive MISN in addition to the Tools for Life intervention. MISN is an evidence-based treatment that augments motivational interviewing with personal social network composition and structure visualization as a means to cultivating healthy social networks and cultural worlds.
Tools for Life focuses on empowering youth to learn more about their culture and their identity. MISN focuses on helping youth get support from their community and social networks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Suicide intent/risk
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months
We will use the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS) [0 = Never, 10 = Always]
Change from baseline to 3 months
Suicide intent/risk
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
We will use the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS) [0 = Never, 10 = Always]
Change from baseline to 6 months
Suicide intent/risk
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months
We will use the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS) [0 = Never, 10 = Always]
Change from baseline to 12 months
Depression
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) [0 -not at all to 3-nearly every day]
Change from baseline to 3 months
Depression
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) [0 -not at all to 3-nearly every day]
Change from baseline to 6 months
Depression
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) [0 -not at all to 3-nearly every day]
Change from baseline to 12 months
Anxiety
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months
Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) [0 -not at all to 3-nearly every day]
Change from baseline to 3 months
Anxiety
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) [0 -not at all to 3-nearly every day]
Change from baseline to 6 months
Anxiety
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months
Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) [0 -not at all to 3-nearly every day]
Change from baseline to 12 months
Frequency of alcohol use
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months
Number of days used in the past 30 days. [ 0 to 30]
Change from baseline to 3 months
Frequency of alcohol use
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Number of days used in the past 30 days [ 0 to 30]
Change from baseline to 6 months
Frequency of alcohol use
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months
Number of days used in the past 30 days [ 0 to 30]
Change from baseline to 12 months
Alcohol use consequences
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months
Number of times in the past 3 months youth experience 4 different alcohol consequences [0 = Never to 6 = 20 or more times]
Change from baseline to 3 months
Alcohol use consequences
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Number of times in the past 3 months youth experience 4 different alcohol consequences [0 = Never to 6 = 20 or more times]
Change from baseline to 6 months
Alcohol use consequences
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months
Number of times in the past 3 months youth experience 4 different alcohol consequences [0 = Never to 6 = 20 or more times]
Change from baseline to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sobriety self-efficacy
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months
Three items ask how sure youth are about staying sober from alcohol from 1= def drink to 5 = def not drink
Change from baseline to 3 months
Sobriety self-efficacy
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Three items ask how sure youth are about staying sober from alcohol from 1= def drink to 5 = def not drink
Change from baseline to 6 months
Sobriety self-efficacy
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months
Three items ask how sure youth are about staying sober from alcohol from 1= def drink to 5 = def not drink
Change from baseline to 12 months
Intentions to be sober from alcohol
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months
Youth report on intentions to be sober in the next 6 months from 1 = def yes to 4 = def no
Change from baseline to 3 months
Intentions to be sober from alcohol
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Youth report on intentions to be sober in the next 6 months from 1 = def yes to 4 = def no
Change from baseline to 6 months
Intentions to be sober from alcohol
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months
Youth report on intentions to be sober in the next 6 months from 1 = def yes to 4 = def no
Change from baseline to 12 months
Social network composition
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months
Participants will be asked to name 15 contacts ("alters") who are at least 18 years of age. Participants will rate each of the 15 people on the same set of questions with categorical response options (about demographics, relationship quality, likelihood to use drugs, etc.). For each participant, the selected responses will be summed across all of the network alters and divided by 15 to produce network composition percentages of the whole set of alters named by the participant (% of AI/ANs, % who engage in heavy drinking).
Change from baseline to 3 months
Social network composition
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Participants will be asked to name 15 contacts ("alters") who are at least 18 years of age. Participants will rate each of the 15 people on the same set of questions with categorical response options (about demographics, relationship quality, likelihood to use drugs, etc.). For each participant, the selected responses will be summed across all of the network alters and divided by 15 to produce network composition percentages of the whole set of alters named by the participant (% of AI/ANs, % who engage in heavy drinking).
Change from baseline to 6 months
Social network composition
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months
Participants will be asked to name 15 contacts ("alters") who are at least 18 years of age. Participants will rate each of the 15 people on the same set of questions with categorical response options (about demographics, relationship quality, likelihood to use drugs, etc.). For each participant, the selected responses will be summed across all of the network alters and divided by 15 to produce network composition percentages of the whole set of alters named by the participant (% of AI/ANs, % who engage in heavy drinking).
Change from baseline to 12 months
Social network structure
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months
Participants will rate the relationship strength between each of the 15 named alters. For each alter pair participants will rate if the two people know each other and, if yes, have individuals connected recently. Measures of network structure (i.e., network "connectedness") will be constructed from the set of evaluations for each participant. For example, network "density" will be constructed for the network overall, which is calculated by summing the number of alter pairs who know each other and dividing by the total number of possible ties among 15 alters (105). Individual alter "centrality" will be calculated by summing the number of connections each individual alter has with other alters in the network.
Change from baseline to 3 months
Social network structure
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Participants will rate the relationship strength between each of the 15 named alters. For each alter pair participants will rate if the two people know each other and, if yes, have individuals connected recently. Measures of network structure (i.e., network "connectedness") will be constructed from the set of evaluations for each participant. For example, network "density" will be constructed for the network overall, which is calculated by summing the number of alter pairs who know each other and dividing by the total number of possible ties among 15 alters (105). Individual alter "centrality" will be calculated by summing the number of connections each individual alter has with other alters in the network.
Change from baseline to 6 months
Social network structure
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months
Participants will rate the relationship strength between each of the 15 named alters. For each alter pair participants will rate if the two people know each other and, if yes, have individuals connected recently. Measures of network structure (i.e., network "connectedness") will be constructed from the set of evaluations for each participant. For example, network "density" will be constructed for the network overall, which is calculated by summing the number of alter pairs who know each other and dividing by the total number of possible ties among 15 alters (105). Individual alter "centrality" will be calculated by summing the number of connections each individual alter has with other alters in the network.
Change from baseline to 12 months
Time spent around peers who use alcohol
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months
Participants will report on how much time is spent around peers who drink from 0 = never to 3 = often
Change from baseline to 3 months
Time spent around peers who use alcohol
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Participants will report on how much time is spent around peers who drink from 0 = never to 3 = often
Change from baseline to 6 months
Time spent around peers who use alcohol
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months
Participants will report on how much time is spent around peers who drink from 0 = never to 3 = often
Change from baseline to 12 months
Awareness of connectedness
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months
Youth report on feelings of connectedness to community, family and environment from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree
Change from baseline to 3 months
Awareness of connectedness
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Youth report on feelings of connectedness to community, family and environment from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree
Change from baseline to 6 months
Awareness of connectedness
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months
Youth report on feelings of connectedness to community, family and environment from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree
Change from baseline to 12 months
Community protective factors
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months
Youth Community Protective Factors Scale. Youth report on feelings about different protective factors from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree
Change from baseline to 3 months
Community protective factors
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Youth Community Protective Factors Scale Youth report on feelings about different community protective factors from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree
Change from baseline to 6 months
Community protective factors
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months
Youth Community Protective Factors Scale Youth report on feelings about different community protective factors from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree
Change from baseline to 12 months
Individual protective factors
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months
Youth report on feelings about different individual protective factors from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree
Change from baseline to 3 months
Individual protective factors
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Youth report on feelings about different individual protective factors from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree
Change from baseline to 6 months
Individual protective factors
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months
Youth report on feelings about different individual protective factors from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree
Change from baseline to 12 months
Reasons for life
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months
Brief Reasons for Life Scale from 1 not at all important to 5 very important
Change from baseline to 3 months
Reasons for life
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
Brief Reasons for Life Scale from 1 not at all important to 5 very important
Change from baseline to 6 months
Reasons for life
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months
Brief Reasons for Life Scale from 1 not at all important to 5 very important
Change from baseline to 12 months
Reflective processes
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months
The Reflective Processes scale taps a culturally patterned type of awareness and youth report from from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree
Change from baseline to 3 months
Reflective processes
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months
The Reflective Processes scale taps a culturally patterned type of awareness and youth report from from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree
Change from baseline to 6 months
Reflective processes
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months
The Reflective Processes scale taps a culturally patterned type of awareness and youth report from from 1 = strongly agree to 5 strongly disagree
Change from baseline to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 22, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The investigators will share only deidentified, aggregate data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Suicidal Ideation

Clinical Trials on Tools for Life

3
Subscribe