Synergistic Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation in Patients With Vitiligo and Vitamin D Deficiency

May 3, 2022 updated by: Bo Young Chung, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital

Vitamin D Supplementation in Patients With Vitiligo Induced Additive Effects With Phototherapy

This prospective, randomized, controlled study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital (IRB no. 2018-04-017). All study participants consented the study and agreed the written informed consent. All participants who are applicable to the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to two groups: the control group and the study group. Both groups were treated with phototherapy including 308-nm excimer laser or narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB). Study group had vitamin D supplementation through the injection additionally.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. patients diagnosed with non-segmental vitiligo based on clinical diagnosis.
  2. patients who were ≥ 18 years old.
  3. patients with lower serum vitamin D level (<20ng/mL).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. patients taking medicines such as thiazide, diuretics, lithium which can influence the serum vitamin D level.
  2. pregnant or lactating women.
  3. patients with diseases which can affect kidney such as chronic kidney disease, hyperparathyroidism, or hypoparathyroidism.
  4. patients with uncontrolled chronic diseases like diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, hypertension
  5. patients whose spot urine calcium level was over 30mg/dL.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Study group
They were treated with phototherapy including 308-nm excimer laser or narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB). They had vitamin D supplementation through the injection of cholecalciferol additionally. The study group with vitamin D deficiency was treated with intramuscular injection of 200,000 IU cholecalciferol (Kwangdong Pharmaceutical Co., Seoul, Korea) once at baseline. Total study period was 6 months and the clinical assessments with checking adverse events were conducted every month.
The study group with vitamin D deficiency was treated with intramuscular injection of 200,000 IU cholecalciferol (Kwangdong Pharmaceutical Co., Seoul, Korea) once at baseline.
The phototherapy for treating depigmented areas was by using 308-nm xenon chloride excimer laser (E1, Jetema, Seoul, Korea) or NB-UVB (N-UVB 6000C, Choyang medical, Seongnam, Korea). The initial dose for excimer laser was decided based on the location of depigmented lesion with consideration of the previous results of the phototherapy;40-42 eye = 100mJ/cm2; head, face, ear, neck, axilla = 150mJ/cm2; arm, leg, trunk = 200mJ/cm2; wrist = 250mJ/cm2; elbow, knee = 300mJ/cm2; hand, foot = 400mJ/cm2; finger, toe = 600mJ/cm2; Meanwhile, initial dose for NB-UVB was 400mJ/cm2. If the erythema after laser disappears within 24 hours, the energy dose was increased by 50 mJ/cm2 for each treatment. But if the erythema sustained for 24-48 hours, the energy dose was maintained. If the erythema last longer than 48 hours, the energy dose was decreased by 50-100 mJ/cm2 at each session. If blistering or pain occured, the treatment was omitted until resolution of symptoms.
Active Comparator: Control group
They were treated with phototherapy including 308-nm excimer laser or narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB). Total study period was 6 months and the clinical assessments with checking adverse events were conducted every month.
The phototherapy for treating depigmented areas was by using 308-nm xenon chloride excimer laser (E1, Jetema, Seoul, Korea) or NB-UVB (N-UVB 6000C, Choyang medical, Seongnam, Korea). The initial dose for excimer laser was decided based on the location of depigmented lesion with consideration of the previous results of the phototherapy;40-42 eye = 100mJ/cm2; head, face, ear, neck, axilla = 150mJ/cm2; arm, leg, trunk = 200mJ/cm2; wrist = 250mJ/cm2; elbow, knee = 300mJ/cm2; hand, foot = 400mJ/cm2; finger, toe = 600mJ/cm2; Meanwhile, initial dose for NB-UVB was 400mJ/cm2. If the erythema after laser disappears within 24 hours, the energy dose was increased by 50 mJ/cm2 for each treatment. But if the erythema sustained for 24-48 hours, the energy dose was maintained. If the erythema last longer than 48 hours, the energy dose was decreased by 50-100 mJ/cm2 at each session. If blistering or pain occured, the treatment was omitted until resolution of symptoms.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI)
Time Frame: baseline
Each VASI score was decided by multiplying the area of vitiligo and the extent of depigmentation.
baseline
Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI)
Time Frame: 1 month
Each VASI score was decided by multiplying the area of vitiligo and the extent of depigmentation.
1 month
Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI)
Time Frame: 2 month
Each VASI score was decided by multiplying the area of vitiligo and the extent of depigmentation.
2 month
Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI)
Time Frame: 3 month
Each VASI score was decided by multiplying the area of vitiligo and the extent of depigmentation.
3 month
Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI)
Time Frame: 4 month
Each VASI score was decided by multiplying the area of vitiligo and the extent of depigmentation.
4 month
Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI)
Time Frame: 5 month
Each VASI score was decided by multiplying the area of vitiligo and the extent of depigmentation.
5 month
Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI)
Time Frame: 6 month
Each VASI score was decided by multiplying the area of vitiligo and the extent of depigmentation.
6 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physician global assessment (PGA)
Time Frame: baseline
The PGA score was calculated to check the improvement after treatments. The scale was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = 76-100%.
baseline
Physician global assessment (PGA)
Time Frame: 1 month
The PGA score was calculated to check the improvement after treatments. The scale was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = 76-100%.
1 month
Physician global assessment (PGA)
Time Frame: 2 month
The PGA score was calculated to check the improvement after treatments. The scale was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = 76-100%.
2 month
Physician global assessment (PGA)
Time Frame: 3 month
The PGA score was calculated to check the improvement after treatments. The scale was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = 76-100%.
3 month
Physician global assessment (PGA)
Time Frame: 4 month
The PGA score was calculated to check the improvement after treatments. The scale was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = 76-100%.
4 month
Physician global assessment (PGA)
Time Frame: 5 month
The PGA score was calculated to check the improvement after treatments. The scale was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = 76-100%.
5 month
Physician global assessment (PGA)
Time Frame: 6 month
The PGA score was calculated to check the improvement after treatments. The scale was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = 76-100%.
6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Bo Young Chung, M.D., PhD, Department of Dermatology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vitamin D Deficiency

Clinical Trials on cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)

Subscribe