Efficacy and Safety of Pentoxifylline in Improving Oxygenation in Hepatopulmonary Syndrome

Efficacy and Safety of Pentoxifylline in Improving Oxygenation in Hepatopulmonary Syndrome: A Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial

The triad of liver disease, arterial hypoxia, and extensive pulmonary vascular dilatation is known as the hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS). The prevalence of this syndrome ranges from 10% to 30% in people with chronic liver disease.

The exact cause of HPS is unknown. Previous research has shown that eicosanoids function as vasoconstrictors and cause an increase in the number of intravascular macrophage-like cells. Cirrhosis has been linked to increased NO generation in the lungs, which has been linked to intrapulmonary venous dilation. Increased pulmonary NO production is attributed to increased expression of pulmonary vascular endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) and inducible NO synthase.

Increased hepatic synthesis and release of low levels of endothelin 1 (ET-1) has been established in recent investigations to function as a trigger for increasing eNO levels. TNF (tumor necrosis factor) and ET-1 have both been linked to the onset of experimental HPS. Increased CO generation and heme oxygenase expression have been linked to the progression of HPS in recent investigations. HPS increases mortality in cirrhotic patients and may affect the frequency and severity of portal hypertension consequences.

To the best of our knowledge there have been only three pilot studies in humans which checked the effect of pentoxifylline in hepatopulmonary syndrome and they showed highly contrasting results. The outcome was also measured in a short interval. Investigator hypothesize that pentoxifylline would improve the oxygenation in patients with hepatopulmonary syndrome

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Hypothesis Investigator hypothesize that pentoxifylline in hepatopulmonary syndrome would improve oxygenation by inhibiting TNF alpha and thereby reducing macrophage, endothelium induced NO production compared to placebo

Aim To study efficacy of pentoxifylline in reducing AaPO2 in hepatopulmonary syndrome when compared to placebo

Methodology:

Study design: Prospective double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial DATA and SPECIMEN collection Patient data, demographics, etiology of liver disease, PFT, abdominal radiological studies will be collected 6-minute walk test will be done at the baseline, 3 months, and 6 months Sampling for ABG will be performed with the subject seated while breathing room air at baseline and at the end of 3 and 6 months and A-aPO2 values will be calculated using Alveolar gas equation.

TNF alpha levels, vWF, ET-1, VEGFR-3, iNOS, eNOS and IL-1 β levels will be measured at baseline and after 3 and 6 months.

DLCO and exhaled NO will be measured at the baseline and at the end of 3 and 6 months Blinding The study drug and placebo will be administered in identical packaging and labelling to ensure that investigators and participants are blinded to study treatment. The study drug and placebo will be labelled with a unique label letter that will be used to allocate treatment to the patient, but the allocation will not be indicated to the investigators or participants. Except for the trial pharmacists and biostatistician, no member of the study team or their extended personnel will have access to the randomization method during the study's execution. The investigator will get the treatment assignment from trial pharmacists in the case of a medical emergency in which breaking the blind is necessary to give medical care to the participant.

DEFINITION - Hepatopulmonary syndrome will be defined by

  1. Presence of liver disease and / or portal hypertension AND
  2. Partial pressure of oxygen <80mm Hg or Alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient [P (A-a)O2 gradient ≥ 15mmHg (0r 20 mmHg for patients >65 years] AND
  3. Documented Intrapulmonary Vascular Dilatation by saline contrast echocardiogram

Sample size: Assuming that the improvement in oxygenation in the pentoxifylline group is 50% and that in the control group it would be 1%, with an alpha error of 5% and power of 90% investigator need to enroll 38 cases in the study.

Further assuming a dropout rate of 5% investigator need to enroll 40 cases randomized into two groups, 20 each, by block randomization method taking a block size of 4.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Continuous data- Student's t test

  • Nonparametric analysis- Mann Whitney test
  • Survival outcome By Kaplan-Meier method curve.
  • For all tests, p≤ 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
  • Analysis will be performed using SPSS.
  • The analysis will be done with intention to treat and per protocol analysis if applicable.

Stopping rule:

Development of serious adverse effects leading to withdrawal of the drug or death from any cause Adverse events It is defined as the new onset event that is considered as a part of intervention which otherwise may be absent in absence of such intervention or therapy. All adverse events will be recorded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Delhi
      • New Delhi, Delhi, India, 110070
        • Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 - 70 years
  • Evidence of portal hypertension
  • Intrapulmonary vascular dilatation in the form of shunting diagnosed on contrast echocardiogram
  • AaPO2 > 15mmHg on seated room air (ABG) if age <65years and >20mmHg if Age≥ 70 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Child C cirrhosis with CTP > 10 or with refractory ascites
  • Intrinsic significant cardiopulmonary disease

    1. PFT indicating severe obstructive ventilatory defect (FEV1/FVC < 70)
    2. Hepatic hydrothorax, Portopulmonary hypertension
    3. Moderate and severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction
    4. Inability to perform Pulmonary function test
    5. Intracardiac shunting
  • Current use of exogenous nitrates
  • Patients already on pentoxifylline
  • Prior intolerance to pentoxifylline
  • Very severe cases of HPS (A-aO2 gradient ≥ 15mm Hg, PO2 <50 mmHg)
  • Active bacterial infections, active hepatic encephalopathy
  • Known malignancy including HCC
  • SBP on secondary prophylaxis
  • CKD with creatinine clearance < 30
  • Enrolled in other trials
  • Has a liver transplant option

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pentoxifylline
400mg OD x 1 week, 400mg BD x 1 week then increased to 400mg TDS and continued
400mg OD x 1 week, 400mg BD x 1 week then increased to 400mg TDS and continued
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo will be given in a same manner as experimental drug
Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in AaPO2 gradient by at least 5mmHg or to a value less than 15mm Hg at the end of 6 months from baseline
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in grading of intrapulmonary shunting at the end of 3 month, from baseline as assessed by saline contrast echocardiography
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
Change in grading of intrapulmonary shunting at the end of 6 month, from baseline as assessed by saline contrast echocardiography
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Change in DLCO (Diffusing Capacity of the lungs for Carbon Monoxide) at the end of 3 month from baseline
Time Frame: 3 month
3 month
Change in Forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV1) at the end of 3 month from baseline
Time Frame: 3 month
3 month
Change in FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) at the end of 3 month from baseline
Time Frame: 3 month
3 month
Change in FEV1/FVC ratio at the end of 3 month from baseline
Time Frame: 3 month
3 month
Change in 6-minute walk test at the end of 3 month from baseline
Time Frame: 3 month
3 month
Change in DLCO (Diffusing Capacity of the lungs for Carbon Monoxide) at the end of 6 month from baseline
Time Frame: 6 month
6 month
Change in Forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV1) at the end of 6 month from baseline
Time Frame: 6 month
6 month
Change in FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) at the end of 6 month from baseline
Time Frame: 6 month
6 month
Change in FEV1/FVC ratio at the end of 6 month from baseline
Time Frame: 6 month
6 month
Change in 6-minute walk test at the end of 6 month from baseline
Time Frame: 6 month
6 month
Change in seated oxygen saturation at 3 month from baseline
Time Frame: 3 month
3 month
Change in PaO2 at 3 month from baseline
Time Frame: 3 month
3 month
Change in seated oxygen saturation at 6 month from baseline
Time Frame: 6 month
6 month
Change in PaO2 at 6 month from baseline
Time Frame: 6 month
6 month
Change in inflammatory markers at the end of 3 month from baseline
Time Frame: 3 month
TNF alpha levels, vWF, ET-1, IL-6, S-1-P levels
3 month
Change in inflammatory markers at the end of 6 month from baseline
Time Frame: 6 month
TNF alpha levels, vWF, ET-1, IL-6, S-1-P levels at the end of 6 month from baseline
6 month
Change in inflammatory markers at the end of 3 month from baseline in a subset of patients wherever feasible
Time Frame: 3 month
VEGFR-3, iNOS, eNOS and IL-1 β
3 month
Change in inflammatory markers at the end of 6 month from baseline in a subset of patients wherever feasible
Time Frame: 6 month
VEGFR-3, iNOS, eNOS and IL-1 β
6 month
Change in DLCO fraction of exhaled NO after 3 month from baseline
Time Frame: 3 month
3 month
Change in DLCO fraction of exhaled NO after 6 month from baseline
Time Frame: 6 month
6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

May 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatopulmonary Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe