Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Acute Neck Pain

August 4, 2023 updated by: Michael Bjorn Russell, University Hospital, Akershus

Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Acute Neck Pain: a 4- Arm Clinical Placebo Randomized Controlled Trial

Acute neck is very common in the general population and often causes disability over shorter or longer time periods. Unfortunately, the efficacy of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (CSMT) and the efficacy of Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) on acute neck pain is unknown. This 4-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) will likely provide evidence for the efficacy of CSMT as well as NSAIDs. The applied methodology of the study will aim towards the highest research standards possible for manual-therapy RCTs, thus avoiding typical methodological shortcomings from previous manual-therapy studies. Our aim is to establish evidence-based knowledge on the efficacy of CSMT and NSAIDs in the treatment of acute neck pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Global Burden of Disease study ranks musculoskeletal neck pain as the most common disability worldwide. This study will highlight and validate CSMT for acute neck pain, compared to sham manipulation, ibuprofen and placebo medication. NSAIDs are the most frequently prescribed medications by GPs worldwide and are widely used for patients with back pain. However, evidence-based data are missing for acute neck pain patients treated with NSAIDs while existing evidence for CSMT for acute neck pain are limited by serious methodological shortcomings.

The 4-arm placebo-controlled RCT will assess the efficacy in the following four treatment groups:

  1. Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (CSMT)
  2. CSMT sham manipulation (placebo)
  3. Ibuprofen (NSAID)
  4. Placebo medication

We intend to invite 40 recruiting chiropractors from larger Norwegian cities, distributed by gender and geography. The study participants presenting to each chiropractor will be block-randomized equally into one of four study groups based on a computer-generated algorithm. Each chiropractor will include 16 participants, four into each arm. A total of 320 participants will be enrolled in the RCT, within 12 months. Participants randomized into the chiropractic treatment groups will receive 5 interventions over 12 days, i.e., CSMT or CSMT sham manipulation; while the pharmacological groups will receive 600mg ibuprofen or placebo administered 3 times daily for 12 days.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

320

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Oslo, Norway, 1478
        • Recruiting
        • Michael B. Russell
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Aleksander Chaibi, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Anna J. Allen-Unhammer, PhD student

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 59 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria

  1. Eligible participants are between the age of 18 and 59 years old
  2. Acute non-radicular neck pain, i.e., grade 1 or 2 according to the classification by the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on neck pain
  3. Onset of the present episode ≤2 weeks prior to the 1st chiropractic visit
  4. Moderate, severe or very severe pain intensity, i.e., ≥4, on a numeric rating scale (NRS) 0-10
  5. Pain free for at least four consecutive weeks prior to the present pain episode
  6. Not treated by a chiropractor during the past 3 months
  7. Participants must accept not to seek other manual and/or pharmacological treatments for their acute neck pain during the intervention period
  8. Non-pregnant women. Women in doubt shall have a negative fertility test before inclusion

Exclusion criteria

  1. Contraindication to ibuprofen

    1. active peptic ulcer
    2. gastrointestinal bleeding
    3. previous repeated episode (≥2 detected events) with peptic ulcer or gastrointestinal bleeding
    4. previous gastrointestinal bleeding or ulcer using NSAIDs
    5. hypersensitivity to ibuprofen
    6. asthma induced by acetylsalicylic acid or other NSAIDs
    7. urticarial
    8. rhinitis
    9. severe heart failure (NYHA class IV)
    10. renal failure (glomerulus infusion <30 ml/min)
  2. Taken pain- and/or anti-inflammatory medicine during the past 24 hours? (Patients that have taken acute pain- and/or anti-inflammatory medicine, including ibuprofen, can be included if they come back after 24 hours without having taken the medicine where they then fill out questionnaires and are randomized at the clinic)
  3. On prescribed antidepressant
  4. Major psychiatric disorder
  5. Pregnancy or intention to be pregnant
  6. Contraindication to SMT
  7. Signs of spinal radiculopathy including progressive neurological deficit
  8. Upper cervical spine instability (positive Sharp-Purser test)
  9. Previous fracture in the cervical and/or thoracic spine
  10. Previous cervical spine surgery
  11. Recent (<6 months) severe physical trauma to the head, neck or thoracic spine within the previous 6 months
  12. Concomitant low back pain with moderate, severe or very severe pain intensity (≥4 on a NRS)
  13. Current chronic pain (defined as ≥3 months duration)
  14. Rheumatoid arthritis
  15. Recent (<2 weeks) acute respiratory infection with fever
  16. Any presence of ischemic symptoms upon examination
  17. Horner's syndrome
  18. Medical history of arterial anomalies
  19. History of connective tissue disorder
  20. Familial history of cervical artery dissection
  21. Other vascular disorders
  22. Inability to understand instructions given in the Norwegian language
  23. Inability to fill out digital questionnaires
  24. Other reasons to exclude the patient as deemed necessary by the chiropractor

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy (CSMT)
A specific contact, high-velocity, low-amplitude, spinal thrust manipulation directed to spinal biomechanical dysfunction in the cervical and/or thoracic spinal column, as diagnosed by standard chiropractic tests, in accordance with their clinical judgment.
See study arm.
Sham Comparator: CSMT sham manipulation
A broad non-specific contact, low-velocity, low-amplitude sham push manoeuvre in a non-therapeutic directional line.
See study arm.
Active Comparator: Ibuprofen
Ibuprofen 600mg, 3 times daily for 12 days.
See study arm.
Other Names:
  • Orifarm
Sham Comparator: Placebo medication
Placebo medication, x 3 times daily for 12 days.
See study arm.
Other Names:
  • Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean pain intensity change
Time Frame: From Day-0 to Day-14 between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, and CSMT and placebo medicine.
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10
From Day-0 to Day-14 between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, and CSMT and placebo medicine.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean pain intensity change
Time Frame: From Day-0 to Day-14. Comparison between ibuprofen and placebo medicine.
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10
From Day-0 to Day-14. Comparison between ibuprofen and placebo medicine.
Mean pain intensity change
Time Frame: From Day-0 to Day 2-13 in the treatment period, and from Day-0 to Day 7, 28, 56, 84 and 168 post-treatment, respectively, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine.
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10
From Day-0 to Day 2-13 in the treatment period, and from Day-0 to Day 7, 28, 56, 84 and 168 post-treatment, respectively, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine.
Mean duration (hours) of neck pain change
Time Frame: From Day-0 to Day 2-13 and 14; From Day-0 to Day 7, 28, 56, 84 and 168 post-treatment, respectively, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine.
Hours (0-24)
From Day-0 to Day 2-13 and 14; From Day-0 to Day 7, 28, 56, 84 and 168 post-treatment, respectively, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine.
Mean number of days with neck pain per week
Time Frame: From the treatment period (14 days) to the periods; day 1-7, 22-28, 50-56, 78-84 and 162-168 post-treatment, respectively, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine.
Weekly number of days
From the treatment period (14 days) to the periods; day 1-7, 22-28, 50-56, 78-84 and 162-168 post-treatment, respectively, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine.
Proportions of participants with mean daily pain intensity reduction of ≥50%, ≥75% and 100%
Time Frame: From Day-0 to Day 2-13 and 14, and from Day-0 to Day 7, 28, 56, 84 and 168 post-treatment, respectively, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine.
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10
From Day-0 to Day 2-13 and 14, and from Day-0 to Day 7, 28, 56, 84 and 168 post-treatment, respectively, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine.
Proportions of participants with mean duration (hours) reduction of ≥50%, ≥75% and 100%
Time Frame: From Day-0 to Day 2-13 and 14, and from Day-0 to Day 7, 28, 56, 84 and 168 post-treatment, respectively, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine.
Hours 0-24
From Day-0 to Day 2-13 and 14, and from Day-0 to Day 7, 28, 56, 84 and 168 post-treatment, respectively, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine.
Proportions of participants with mean reduction of number of days with neck pain per week of ≥50%, ≥75% and 100%
Time Frame: From the treatment period (14 days), to the periods: Day 1-7, 22-28, 50-56, 78-84 and 162-168 post-treatment, respectively, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine
Weekly number of days
From the treatment period (14 days), to the periods: Day 1-7, 22-28, 50-56, 78-84 and 162-168 post-treatment, respectively, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine
Improvement in Research and development 12 (RAND-12) score (12 questions each with 5 possible answers)
Time Frame: From Day-0 to Day-14, Day-84 and 168 post-treatment, respectively, comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine.
RAND-12 Term Short Form Health Survey (0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning)
From Day-0 to Day-14, Day-84 and 168 post-treatment, respectively, comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine.
Improvement in Neck Disability Index score (10 questions each with 6 possible answers)
Time Frame: From Day-0 to Day-14, Day-84 and 168 post-treatment, respectively, comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine.
Neck Disability Index (0-100, where 0 = no disability and 100 = complete disability)
From Day-0 to Day-14, Day-84 and 168 post-treatment, respectively, comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine.
Adverse event (AE) analysis
Time Frame: Daily during intervention period (day 2-13). AE analysis of CSMT, sham CSMT, ibuprofen, and placebo medicine, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine.
Within and between group adverse events analysis
Daily during intervention period (day 2-13). AE analysis of CSMT, sham CSMT, ibuprofen, and placebo medicine, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine.
Analysis of patients' blinding (Manual therapy)
Time Frame: Daily during intervention period (Day-0, Day 2-13). Analysis of CSMT and sham CSMT, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT.
Numerical rating scale (NRS) 0-10 in relation to receiving real CSMT (0 absolutely unsure and 10 absolutely sure that real CSMT was received), irrespective of whether the patient received sham or real CSMT
Daily during intervention period (Day-0, Day 2-13). Analysis of CSMT and sham CSMT, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT.
Analysis of patients' blinding (Medicine)
Time Frame: Daily during intervention period (Day-0, Day 2-13). Analysis of ibuprofen and placebo medicine, and comparison between ibuprofen and placebo medicine.
Numerical rating scale (NRS) 0-10 in relation to receiving ibuprofen (0 absolutely unsure and 10 absolutely sure that ibuprofen was received), irrespective of whether the patient received ibuprofen or placebo medicine
Daily during intervention period (Day-0, Day 2-13). Analysis of ibuprofen and placebo medicine, and comparison between ibuprofen and placebo medicine.
Patients' and chiropractors' expectations to treatment efficacy
Time Frame: Day-0
Numerical rating scale (NRS) 0-10 (0 no expectation at all and 10 the highest possible expectation to treatment efficacy)
Day-0
Analysis of patients' satisfaction to treatment efficacy
Time Frame: Day-14 of the intervention period
Numerical rating scale (NRS) 0-10 (0 no satisfaction at all, and 10 the highest possible satisfaction)
Day-14 of the intervention period

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sick leave
Time Frame: Mean number of days at Day-0 compared to Week-12 and Week-24 post-treatment.
Number of days and grade of sick leave
Mean number of days at Day-0 compared to Week-12 and Week-24 post-treatment.
Validation of user ID-number
Time Frame: All digital questionnaires from Day-0 to study completion, that is to 24-weeks follow-up.
Number and proportions of incorrect typing of ID-numbers during digital questionnaire completion.
All digital questionnaires from Day-0 to study completion, that is to 24-weeks follow-up.
Facilitatory/inhibitory factors/dilemmas affecting recruitment Qualitative focus group interviews to explore facilitatory/inhibitory factors and possible dilemmas experienced by chiropractor investigators.
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Qualitative focus group interviews with all chiropractor investigators.
Up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Michael B. Russell, Professor, Division for Research and Innovation, Akershus University Hospital, Norway
  • Principal Investigator: Aleksander Chaibi, PhD, Institute for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 23, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (CSMT)

Subscribe