- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02168153
Assessment of Chiropractic Treatment Using Reaction and Response Times in Members of the Special Operation Forces (ACT2)
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The Assessment of Chiropractic Treatment 2 (ACT2) assesses changes in reaction/response times following Chiropractic Manipulative Therapy (CMT) using a randomized controlled trial in members of SFQ or SOAR. This population is faced with simultaneous physiological and cognitive demands. The ability to give an accurate and appropriate motor response in a short time is required for successful completion of the types of missions they are expected to undertake.
It is possible that chiropractic care can improve performance in reaction and response times in populations that have low back pain and in populations that are asymptomatic. One possible theory for improvement, even in asymptomatic persons, is that they may have experienced an insult or stress to the body which is subclinical but alters their ability to function in an optimal manner. Thus a person may be asymptomatic and able to accomplish many activities in a normal manner, but when stressed to the limits of maximum capability, the effects of subclinical abnormalities may cause that person to function at a less than optimal level. If CMT is able to restore normal, more efficient mechanisms of functioning, it is therefore possible that the performance of challenging tasks could be improved.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Kentucky
-
Fort Campbell North, Kentucky, United States, 42223
- Blanchfield Army Community Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age range at least 20 years of age
- Written informed consent
- Active duty SFQ personnel or Special Operation Forces who are part of the 160th SOAR regiment on flight status stationed at the Ft. Campbell, KY military site
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pain Intensity (NIH's PROMIS- question #29) > 4 at the Initial Visit
- Additional diagnostic procedure needed (e.g. x-ray)
- Bone and joint pathology contraindications for CMT. Potential participants with recent spinal fracture, concurrent spinal or paraspinal tumor(s), spinal or paraspinal infection(s), inflammatory arthropathies and significant osteoporosis will be referred for appropriate care.
- Other contraindications for CMT (i.e., unstable spinal segments, cauda equina syndrome)
- Currently being treated for traumatic brain injury (TBI)
- Reasonable chance that within 2-4 weeks of initial participation they may be unable to complete the study, i.e., deployment, receive orders for a distant duty assignment or training site or otherwise be absent from the current military site over the study participation period.
- Received care from a Doctor of Chiropractic within the past 30 days.
- Pregnant or planning to become pregnant within 4 weeks.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Chiropractic Manipulative Therapy
Participants will complete questionnaires and biomechanical assessments, and additionally receive CMT treatment.
|
Participants will receive chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy consisting of High velocity low amplitude (HVLA) spinal manipulative procedures.
These procedures are typically associated with a quick manual thrust and a cavitation sound.
For the cervical spine, a procedure called a cervical index pillar push, thoracic manipulation will occur with unilateral or bimanual contacts in the prone or supine positions and lumbar/pelvis manipulation will be performed with a procedure referred to as side-lying or side-posture.
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Wait-List Control Group
Participants will complete questionnaires and biomechanical assessments
|
Participants randomized to the wait-list control group will complete questionnaires and perform the same study procedures as those randomized to the chiropractic manipulative therapy arm.
After completing the required 2-week waiting period, those who wish to receive chiropractic manipulative therapy will be eligible to schedule treatment visits.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Simple Reaction Time With the Dominant Hand
Time Frame: Week 1-Study Visit 2, Week 2-Final Visit, Change from Visit 2 to Final Visit
|
Handedness of the participants will be determined on the basis of self-report.
The subject will react to the appearance of visual prompts on the screen by pressing a button with the thumb of their dominant hand.
A set consists of 11 prompts shown in sequence with a time period between the response to one prompt and the appearance of the next prompt ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 seconds in random order.
The outcome variable for this test, the mean reaction time, is the average of the length of time between the appearance of each prompt and the press of the button in response to that prompt.
|
Week 1-Study Visit 2, Week 2-Final Visit, Change from Visit 2 to Final Visit
|
|
Simple Reaction Time With the Dominant Foot
Time Frame: Week 1-Study Visit 2, Week 2-Final Visit, Change from Visit 2 to Final Visit
|
This test will be done in a manner similar to that for the dominant hand except that the participants will press a pedal with their dominant foot.
|
Week 1-Study Visit 2, Week 2-Final Visit, Change from Visit 2 to Final Visit
|
|
Choice Reaction Time
Time Frame: Week 1-Study Visit 2, Week 2-Final Visit, Change from Visit 2 to Final Visit
|
Prompts on the screen will occur with the same time interval (1 second) in between the press of a button or pedal in response to one prompt and the appearance of the next prompt.
Each prompt could be for either hand or either foot and the position of the prompt on the computer screen will indicate which thumb or foot should be used.
If the wrong button or pedal is pressed, the software still goes on to the next prompt, but keeps track of how many incorrect responses were made.
A set consists of a sequence of 41 prompts.
The outcome variable for this test, mean reaction time, is the average length of time between each prompt's appearance and the participant's response.
|
Week 1-Study Visit 2, Week 2-Final Visit, Change from Visit 2 to Final Visit
|
|
Response Time Involving the Dominant Hand (Fitts Law Test)
Time Frame: Week 1-Study Visit 2, Week 2-Final Visit, Change from Visit 2 to Final Visit
|
Participants perform a computerized simple target acquisition task (a Fitts Law task) to investigate their response times using a mouse with their dominant hand.
The participant will complete a block, a series of target selections on a computer monitor, by working through 32 trials.
That is, 32 pairs of 'hits' - meaning the mouse was clicked when the cursor was inside each of two circles that appear on the screen.
The measured outcome from this task will be the sum of the times required to complete each trial.
|
Week 1-Study Visit 2, Week 2-Final Visit, Change from Visit 2 to Final Visit
|
|
Response Time Involving Whole Body Movement (T-wall)
Time Frame: Week 1-Study Visit 2, Week 2-Final Visit, Change from Visit 2 to Final Visit
|
Participants will stand in front of the t-wall which is a commercially available device with a 4 x 8 foot bank of square buttons that are each 8 cm per side.
When test is begun, one of the buttons lights up.
The participant hits that button with either hand.
The light inside that button then goes out and another button lights up until that one is hit.
This process continues for a random sequence of 100 buttons.
When last button is hit, all the buttons light up momentarily to indicate that the test is over.
The measured outcome from this test is the time from when the first button is hit to when the last of the random sequence of 100 buttons is hit.
|
Week 1-Study Visit 2, Week 2-Final Visit, Change from Visit 2 to Final Visit
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ian Coulter, Ph.D, RAND
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- DeVocht JW, Smith DL, Long CR, Corber L, Kane B, Jones TM, Goertz CM. The effect of chiropractic treatment on the reaction and response times of special operation forces military personnel: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Sep 20;17(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1580-1.
- DeVocht JW, Vining R, Smith DL, Long C, Jones T, Goertz C. Effect of chiropractic manipulative therapy on reaction time in special operations forces military personnel: a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019 Jan 3;20(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3133-2.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2012-0352 (Institutional Review Board)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Physiological Measurements of Response and Reaction Times
-
University of BaselUniversity of LausanneCompletedPhysiological Response of Sphingolipids to a Single HIIT SessionSwitzerland
-
Hasse Moller-SorensenCompletedComparison of CardioQ and Thermodilution Derived Cardiac Output MeasurementsDenmark
-
University of VermontUnknownPhysiological Response to Exercise | Perception of Exercise DifficultyUnited States
-
Inonu UniversityCompletedNurse | Premature Newborn | Physiological MeasurementsTurkey
-
IRCCS Policlinico S. DonatoTerminatedAssessment of Safety of Laser Balloon Ablation | Assessment of Procedural Times of Laser Ballon AblationItaly
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedAccuracy of Clinic-based Weight MeasurementsUnited States
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityNational Eye Institute (NEI)CompletedMeasurements of Patients Using OCT Before and After LASIKUnited States
-
Seva Canada SocietyPragyaan Sustainable Health Outcomes Foundation; Geta Eye HospitalNot yet recruitingPatient Satisfaction | Waiting Times, Patient Pathways, Effect of Lifestyle-related, Clinical and Demographic Parameters on Outcomes
-
University of OxfordCompletedImmune Response | BCG Infection | Reaction - VaccineUnited Kingdom
-
King Abdulaziz UniversityCompletedEffect of Carriere® Motion™ Appliance on Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions | Effect of Carriere® Motion™ Appliance on Skeletal and Dental MeasurementsSaudi Arabia
Clinical Trials on Chiropractic Manipulative Therapy
-
University Hospital, AkershusNorwegian Foundation for Health and Rehabilitation; Norwegian Chiropractic...CompletedMigraine Without Aura | Migraine With AuraNorway
-
Ian CoulterPalmer College of Chiropractic; Samueli Institute for Information BiologyCompleted
-
University of AlcalaWithdrawn
-
Northwestern Health Sciences UniversityDepartment of Health and Human ServicesCompletedSub-acute and Chronic Back-related Leg PainUnited States
-
Cleveland Chiropractic CollegeCompletedPatellofemoral Pain SyndromeUnited States
-
Community Wellness Center, West Linn, ORCompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2United States
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityThe ONE FoundationCompletedLow Back PainUnited States
-
Université du Québec à Trois-RivièresRecruiting
-
Vancouver General HospitalUnknownLumbar Disc Herniation | Acute SciaticaCanada
-
College Osteopathique de Provence Aix-MarseilleUniversity Hospital, MarseilleRecruitingSickle Cell DiseaseFrance