LIVing Donor Allograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Study (LivD_ACLR)

A Prospective Cohort Study of Skeletally Immature Patients Requiring Endoscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Using Living Donor Hamstring Allograft From a Parent

The Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) is a major stabiliser of the knee. ACL rupture is being increasingly identified in children and skeletally immature patients. The current advice in younger patients is usually to undergo ACL reconstruction. The choice of an ideal graft in children is difficult

This study will use a technique involves the use of hamstring tendons from a living donor, where the adult (usually a parent) agrees to donate their hamstring tendons, which are dissected out of them and implanted into the child

Study Overview

• Status: Recruiting
• Conditions: ACL
• Intervention / Treatment: Procedure: Endoscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction using living donor hamstring allograft from a parent donor

Detailed Description

The Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) is a major stabiliser of the knee. ACL rupture is being increasingly identified in children and skeletally immature patients. Following rupture of this ligament, the current advice in younger patients is usually to undergo ACL reconstruction. Different tissue or materials can be used to reconstruct the ligament. In the majority of cases around the world, tendon material taken from somewhere else in the patient is preferred, particularly the hamstring or patellar tendons.

The choice of an ideal graft in children is difficult. Patients who have not fully grown have smaller tendons than adults, making them less suitable for use in reconstructive surgery. Another option for children's reconstructions is allograft - tendons taken from another human being. This has most commonly been from organ donation (taking tendons from a recently deceased individual) however the rerupture rate of allograft has been shown to be higher than in autograft (tendons taken from the patient themselves). The higher rate of rerupture may be related to the sterilising and storage processes of the harvested tendons.

This study will use a technique used by a leading hospital in Sydney, Australia, that sees and treats a large volume of these patients and has published good outcomes. The technique involves the use of hamstring tendons from a living donor, where the adult (usually a parent) agrees to donate their hamstring tendons, which are dissected out of them and implanted into the child. The technique has the advantage of leaving the child's own tendons intact, and having a larger sized tendon from a parent.

Patients & parents will be approached in clinic after MRI confirmation of an ACL rupture. If all inclusion and exclusion criteria have been passed and they consent to participate, screening documents & tests will be completed. The parent will undergo a hamstring tenotomy whilst the child is prepped for ACL reconstruction, then the hamstring donor graft will be inserted in the child patient, using the surgeon's routine fixation devices. All patients will be assessed for skeletal maturity prior to surgery and will be followed up for two years or until skeletal maturity, whichever happens latest. They will follow standard rehabilitation guidelines for paediatric patients at Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells National Health Service Trust (MTW NHS Trust) and be seen at set study intervals for clinical review, subjective and objective assessment. Any adverse events will be reported to the health regulation authority and Human Tissue Licence Authority.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Estimated): 40
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Helen Sankey, MSc; Phone Number: 01892 635488; Email: h.sankey@nhs.net

Study Locations

• United Kingdom
  • Kent
    • Pembury, Kent, United Kingdom, TN2 4QJ
      • Recruiting
      • Trauma & Orthopaedic Dept, Tunbridge Wells Hospital
      • Contact: Helen Sankey, MSc; Phone Number: 01892 635488; Email: h.sankey@nhs.net
      • Principal Investigator: Nicholas Bowman, FRCS(ortho)

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 8 years to 17 years (Child)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients aged 8 to 17 years inclusive and have a clinically and radiologically confirmed ACL rupture that requires reconstruction.
• Patients who have had previous surgery for meniscal pathology .
• Patients with current meniscal pathology
• The child and their responsible adult are in agreement with the choice to undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using living donor allograft.
• Donors has not previously undergone tendon harvest on the chosen donor limb
• Patients are willing to attend follow up appointments and agree to fill in knee questionnaires and allow instrumented knee ligament testing.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients who have previously undergone ACL surgery on the same limb (and therefore require revision surgery)
• Patients who are immunosuppressed, or receiving immunosuppressive therapy
• Patients who are unable to attend follow-up appointments for continued research purposes.
• Donors who have previously undergone hamstring tendon surgery on the donor limb
• Patients and donors who have a positive screening blood test for any of the transmissible infections tested
• Donors whose answers to the 'Donor Documentation Questionnaire' indicate that there could be a risk of transmissible infection, may not included
• Donors who are not considered healthy enough to undergo a tenotomy under General anaesthetic

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Intervention / Treatment

Experimental: endoscopic ACL reconstruction with parent allograft tendon

Procedure: Endoscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction using living donor hamstring allograft from a parent donor; The Parent donor will undergo hamstring tendon graft harvest under general anaesthesia in a routine fashion in one theatre. The Graft material will be transported thorough to the adjacent theatre, where the child will be anaesthetised and undergoing arthroscopy of their injured knee in preparation for receiving the graft. ACL reconstruction Surgery will be undertaken in the child recipient as per the Surgeons usual technique, +/- meniscus repair +/- lateral tenodesis as required.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC)	Evaluates symptoms, daily activity and sports function. Scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).	6 weeks post op
International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC)	Evaluates symptoms, daily activity and sports function. Scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).	6 months post op
International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC)	Evaluates symptoms, daily activity and sports function	1 year post op
International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC)	Evaluates symptoms, daily activity and sports function. Scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).	2 years post op
Tegner Lysholm	Symptom reporting questionnaire made up of two components. The Lysholm score Scores range from 0 (worse disability) to 100 (less disability) and the Tegner activity scale is a one-item score that graded activity based on work and sports activities on a scale of 0 to 10. Zero represents disability because of knee problems and 10 represents national or international level soccer.	6 weeks post op
Tegner Lysholm	Symptom reporting questionnaire made up of two components. The Lysholm score Scores range from 0 (worse disability) to 100 (less disability) and the Tegner activity scale is a one-item score that graded activity based on work and sports activities on a scale of 0 to 10. Zero represents disability because of knee problems and 10 represents national or international level soccer.	6 months post op
Tegner Lysholm	Symptom reporting questionnaire made up of two components. The Lysholm score Scores range from 0 (worse disability) to 100 (less disability) and the Tegner activity scale is a one-item score that graded activity based on work and sports activities on a scale of 0 to 10. Zero represents disability because of knee problems and 10 represents national or international level soccer.	1 year post op
Tegner Lysholm	Symptom reporting questionnaire made up of two components. The Lysholm score Scores range from 0 (worse disability) to 100 (less disability) and the Tegner activity scale is a one-item score that graded activity based on work and sports activities on a scale of 0 to 10. Zero represents disability because of knee problems and 10 represents national or international level soccer.	2 years post op

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
KT 1000	instrumented laxity test	1 year post op
KT 1000	instrumented laxity test	2 years post op
return to sport questionnaire	Psychological readiness for return to sport questionnaire, comprises 12 questions with a score of 1 to 10 for each. Where a lower score means a better outcome.	1 year post op
return to sport questionnaire	Psychological readiness for return to sport questionnaire, comprises 12 questions with a score of 1 to 10 for each. Where a lower score means a better outcome.	2 years post op
hop test	functional test, In this test, the aim is to jump as far as possible on a single leg, without losing balance and landing firmly. The distance is measured from the start line to the heel of the landing leg. The goal is to have a less than 10% difference in hop distance between the injured limb and uninjured limb.	1 year post op
hop test	functional test, In this test, the aim is to jump as far as possible on a single leg, without losing balance and landing firmly. The distance is measured from the start line to the heel of the landing leg. The goal is to have a less than 10% difference in hop distance between the injured limb and uninjured limb.	2 years post op
squat test	functional test, scoring of the movement strategy occurring in individual body regions, where 0 for appropriate strategy and one for inappropriate movements, for each region with best overall score being 0 and worst 10 points	6 months post op
squat test	functional test, scoring of the movement strategy occurring in individual body regions, where 0 for appropriate strategy and one for inappropriate movements, for each region with best overall score being 0 and worst 10 points	1 year post op
squat test	functional test, scoring of the movement strategy occurring in individual body regions, where 0 for appropriate strategy and one for inappropriate movements, for each region with best overall score being 0 and worst 10 points	2 years post op

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Nicholas Bowman, Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): September 15, 2021
• Primary Completion (Estimated): September 1, 2026
• Study Completion (Estimated): September 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: December 2, 2021
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 24, 2022
• First Posted (Actual): May 27, 2022

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): May 23, 2025
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 20, 2025
• Last Verified: November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: MaidstoneNHS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No