Comparing Adductor Canal Block and Adductor Canal Block-Local Infiltration Analgesia for Post-operative Pain Management

January 20, 2021 updated by: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Adductor Canal Block Versus Combination of Adductor Canal Block and Local Infiltration Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effect on Postoperative Analgesia and Motor Power

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most commonly performed surgeries amongst young orthopedic surgery patients. Optimal post-operative pain control helps to reduce the opioid burden and to improve the patient's experience. Regional anesthesia, such as the femoral nerve block (FNB) and adductor canal block (ACB), are commonly used for post-operative pain control after surgery. The ACB has replaced the FNB. This is because the ACB targets the femoral nerve, while avoiding the numbing effects on quadricep muscle strength that make it difficult to move the leg. Another form of pain control is local infiltration anesthesia (LIA), which directly blocks pain in the knee. Similar to the ACB, it avoids the numbing effects on the quadricep muscle.This can help improve patient safety and experience by reducing risks of falls and allowing the patient to move earlier. This can also be associated with decreased time in the hospital and decreased costs. Technically, it is less complex and can be done the shorter period of time.

The purpose of this study is to refine the pain management technique following anterior cruciate ligament surgery. More specifically, the aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of LIA alone, and a LIA-ACB combination on post-operative pain and thigh muscle strength.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English speaking or any other language with possibility of adequate translation
  • ASA I-III patients
  • Age 18-50
  • BMI ≤ 38 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal or inability to provide informed consent
  • Any contraindication to regional anesthesia including coagulopathy or bleeding diathesis,
  • Allergy to local anesthetics, or infection at the site of the block
  • History of long-term opioid intake (more than 3 months use) or chronic pain disorder (more than 3 months)
  • History of preexisting neuropathy in the operative leg
  • Revision of ACL repair

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Local Infiltration Anesthetic
This group of patients will receive the local infiltration anesthetic only.
For the local infiltration anesthetic, patients will receive 20 cc of 0.5% ropivacaine, by intra-articular injection performed by the surgeon. The injection is done at the end of the surgical procedure, after suturing the incision.
EXPERIMENTAL: Local Infiltration Anesthetic + Adductor Canal Block
This group of patients will receive the local infiltration anesthetic and adductor canal block combination.
For the local infiltration anesthetic, patients will receive 20 cc of 0.25% ropivacaine, by intra-articular injection performed by the surgeon. The injection is done at the end of the surgical procedure, after suturing the incision. For the adductor canal block, patients will receive 20 cc of 0.25% ropivicaine, through injection performed by the anesthesiologist. The injection is done under the sartorius muscle, in mid-thigh, using ultrasound guidance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oral morphine equivalent consumption
Time Frame: Up to 24-hours after surgery
Cumulative oral morphine equivalent consumption over 24 hours post-op
Up to 24-hours after surgery
Quadriceps motor strength
Time Frame: Pre-op, 30 minutes post-anesthesia
Percent decrease in quadriceps motor strength at 30 minutes following anesthesia compared to baseline
Pre-op, 30 minutes post-anesthesia

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
inta-operative opioid consumption
Time Frame: during surgery
Cumulative amount of opioids consumed during surgery
during surgery
Oral morphine equivalent consumption in PACU
Time Frame: PACU admission to PACU discharge (approximately 4 hours)
Cumulative oral morphine equivalent consumed in PACU
PACU admission to PACU discharge (approximately 4 hours)
Post-operative Pain
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours post-operative
area under the curve for rest pain scores during the first 24 hours post-op, using the numeric pain rating scale from 0-10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst possible pain
Up to 24 hours post-operative
Quality of Recovery
Time Frame: At 24 hours post-operative
Measured using the QoR-15 questionnaire at 24 hours post-op
At 24 hours post-operative
Time in hospital
Time Frame: From hospital admission to hospital discharge (approximately 12 hours)
Time from admission to discharge
From hospital admission to hospital discharge (approximately 12 hours)
Nerve Block Complications
Time Frame: up to 24 hours post-operative, up to 2 weeks post-operative
Presence or absence of nerve block complications
up to 24 hours post-operative, up to 2 weeks post-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ACL

Clinical Trials on Local Infiltration Anesthetic

3
Subscribe