- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05400460
Prognosis Study of Different Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery Methods (ACLRSurgRCT)
Outcomes Under Three Different Procedures for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, a Prospective Randomized Cohort Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
- Procedure: Anatomical single-bundle reconstruction(ASBR method)
- Other: rehabilitation training protocol
- Other: Educate patients on return to sports and the importance of quadriceps strength
- Procedure: Central axial single-bundle reconstruction(CASBR group)
- Procedure: Double-bundle reconstruction (DBR method)
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age from 18-45.
- ACL rupture confirmed by both physical examination and MRI.
- Surgery done by senior doctor.
- Using STG as autograft.
Exclusion Criteria:
- With bilateral acl rupture.
- Second injury.
- Previous surgery in extremity.
- With OA.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: ASBR group
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using STG, absorbable interface nails and ASBR procedures.
|
406 people were enrolled in the outpatient clinic, after screening for inclusion and exclusion.
Of the remaining 243 patients who participated in this RCT, 81 were randomly assigned to the ASBR group to receive anatomic single-bundle reconstruction.We used hamstring as an autograft in the operation, and we chose the anatomical footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament for the positioning of the bone tunnel.Arthroscopic ASB ACL reconstruction was conducted with AMP technique.
Other Names:
The rehabilitation program for all patients followed a standardized Process.
The first day after surgery, quadriceps sets, straight-leg raises, and prone hangs were initiated.
All of the patients were allowed to walk with crutches and braces but with no weightbearing.
The range of motion (ROM) progressed from 0 to 90 degrees 3 to 7 days postoperatively and reached 115 degrees within fourth week.
Closed kinetic chain exercises and full weightbearing were started in the sixth week.
Patients progressed to running without braces at 4 to 6 months.
Patients were interviewed by telephone preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, and 1 year postoperatively to ask about Tegner scores and to encourage reasonable return to sports from 6 months postoperatively. Inform patients of the possibility of osteoarthritis in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, and 1 year postoperatively in telephone interviews.Tell the patient that return to sports and quadriceps strength is a must if the knee cartilage damage is to improve. |
|
Other: CASBR group
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using STG, absorbable interface nails and CASBR procedures.
|
The rehabilitation program for all patients followed a standardized Process.
The first day after surgery, quadriceps sets, straight-leg raises, and prone hangs were initiated.
All of the patients were allowed to walk with crutches and braces but with no weightbearing.
The range of motion (ROM) progressed from 0 to 90 degrees 3 to 7 days postoperatively and reached 115 degrees within fourth week.
Closed kinetic chain exercises and full weightbearing were started in the sixth week.
Patients progressed to running without braces at 4 to 6 months.
Patients were interviewed by telephone preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, and 1 year postoperatively to ask about Tegner scores and to encourage reasonable return to sports from 6 months postoperatively. Inform patients of the possibility of osteoarthritis in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, and 1 year postoperatively in telephone interviews.Tell the patient that return to sports and quadriceps strength is a must if the knee cartilage damage is to improve. 406 people were enrolled in the outpatient clinic, after screening for inclusion and exclusion. Of the remaining 243 patients who participated in this RCT, 81 were randomly assigned to CASBR group.Arthroscopic ASB ACL reconstruction was conducted with transtibial technique and using Hamstring as autograft.Single-bundle reconstruction is used in CASBR reconstruction surgery. The footprint of the implant on the lateral femoral condyle was chosen to be the location of the AMB bone canal in DB reconstruction surgery while the footprint of the implant on the tibial plateau was chosen to be the location of the bone canal of the PLB in DB reconstruction surgery.
Other Names:
|
|
Other: DB group
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using STG, absorbable interface nails and DBR procedures.
|
The rehabilitation program for all patients followed a standardized Process.
The first day after surgery, quadriceps sets, straight-leg raises, and prone hangs were initiated.
All of the patients were allowed to walk with crutches and braces but with no weightbearing.
The range of motion (ROM) progressed from 0 to 90 degrees 3 to 7 days postoperatively and reached 115 degrees within fourth week.
Closed kinetic chain exercises and full weightbearing were started in the sixth week.
Patients progressed to running without braces at 4 to 6 months.
Patients were interviewed by telephone preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, and 1 year postoperatively to ask about Tegner scores and to encourage reasonable return to sports from 6 months postoperatively. Inform patients of the possibility of osteoarthritis in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, and 1 year postoperatively in telephone interviews.Tell the patient that return to sports and quadriceps strength is a must if the knee cartilage damage is to improve.
406 people were enrolled in the outpatient clinic, after screening for inclusion and exclusion.
Of the remaining 243 patients who participated in this RCT, 81 were randomly assigned to the DBR group to receive double bundle reconstruction.The hamstring autograft is still used for double-bundle reconstruction.
The surgical approach is to treat the native ligaments as anteromedial bundles and posterolateral bundles and restore the structure of the two bundles of ligaments in the process of a
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess graft healing
Time Frame: At 2 years after surgery
|
The difference in signal density between reconstructed ACL and PCL was used to measure graft ligamentation on MRI.
Higher signal values represent higher inflammation and lower signal values represent better ligamentation.
|
At 2 years after surgery
|
|
Quadriceps strength
Time Frame: At 2 years after surgery
|
Side to side quadriceps strength assessed by Biodex arthrometer test
|
At 2 years after surgery
|
|
Knee laxity (physical exam)
Time Frame: At 2 years after surgery
|
The side to side knee joint laxity of patients after anterior cruciate ligament surgery can be divided into four grades: grade A: -1~2mm(0+), grade B: 3~5mm (1+), grade C: 6~10mm (2+) and D Grade: >10mm(3+) assessed by Lachman test of physical examination.
|
At 2 years after surgery
|
|
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form 2000
Time Frame: At 2 years after surgery
|
Patients will be asked to fill out the IKDC2000 score to document the functional status.
The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
At 2 years after surgery
|
|
Knee laxity (KT-2000 arthrometer)
Time Frame: At 2 years after surgery
|
The knee laxity test of the forward KT-2000 measured knee laxity at pressures of 132Nt, 88Nt, 66Nt, and 44Nt, respectively, while the back-pushing KT-2000 was measured at -132NT, 88Nt, 66Nt, and -44Nt. The foward-pushing KT-2000 asessed side-to-side can be stratified into five levels are (A) < - 1 mm, (B) - 1 to 1 mm, (C) 1-3 mm, (D) 3-5 mm and (E) > 5 mm. The back-pushing KT-2000 is also divided into side to side differences as (A) < - 2 mm, (B) - 2 to - 0.5 mm, (C) - 0.5 to 0.5 mm, (D) 0.5-1 mm and ( E) > 1 mm. |
At 2 years after surgery
|
|
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Time Frame: At 2 years after surgery
|
Magnetic resonance was used to calculate the graft bending angle (GBA), which is the angle between the intra-femoral graft and the intra-articular graft.
GBA is associated with graft widening and graft healing.
|
At 2 years after surgery
|
|
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Time Frame: At 2 years after surgery
|
We used magnetic resonance 3D reconstruction to derive the area perpendicular to the bony canal and subdivide it into the proximal, mid and distal bony canal of the tibia and femur.
Since CT is harmful to the human body, we used magnetic resonance imaging instead of CT to collect the last follow-up data of bone tract widening during the return visit.
|
At 2 years after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Age
Time Frame: At baseline
|
Measuring whether age is a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure
|
At baseline
|
|
BMI
Time Frame: At baseline
|
Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2.
Measuring whether bmi is a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure
|
At baseline
|
|
Gender
Time Frame: At baseline
|
Measuring whether gender is a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure
|
At baseline
|
|
Single-Legged Hop Test
Time Frame: At 2 years after surgery
|
The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded.
The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites.
Record the single hop for distance.
|
At 2 years after surgery
|
|
Single-Legged Hop Test
Time Frame: At 5 years after surgery
|
The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded.
The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites.
Record the single hop for distance.
|
At 5 years after surgery
|
|
Single-Legged Hop Test
Time Frame: At 10 years after surgery
|
The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded.
The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites.
Record the single hop for distance.
|
At 10 years after surgery
|
|
Triple hop test
Time Frame: At 2 years after surgery
|
The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded.
The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites.
Record the triple hop for distance.
|
At 2 years after surgery
|
|
Triple hop test
Time Frame: At 5 years after surgery
|
The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded.
The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites.
Record the triple hop for distance.
|
At 5 years after surgery
|
|
Triple hop test
Time Frame: At 10 years after surgery
|
The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded.
The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites.
Record the triple hop for distance.
|
At 10 years after surgery
|
|
Cross hop test
Time Frame: At 2 years after surgery
|
The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded.
The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites.
Record the cross hop for distance.
|
At 2 years after surgery
|
|
Cross hop test
Time Frame: At 5 years after surgery
|
The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded.
The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites.
Record the cross hop for distance.
|
At 5 years after surgery
|
|
Cross hop test
Time Frame: At 10 years after surgery
|
The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded.
The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites.
Record the cross hop for distance.
|
At 10 years after surgery
|
|
6-m hop test
Time Frame: At 2 years after surgery
|
The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded.
The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites.
Record the 6-meter hop for time.
|
At 2 years after surgery
|
|
6-m hop test
Time Frame: At 5 years after surgery
|
The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded.
The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites.
Record the 6-meter hop for time.
|
At 5 years after surgery
|
|
6-m hop test
Time Frame: At 10 years after surgery
|
The patients will perform three submaximal trial repetitions for familiarisation, after which three maximum effort trials are recorded.
The uninvolved leg will test first at both inclusion sites.
Record the 6-meter hop for time.
|
At 10 years after surgery
|
|
Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living (KOS-ADLS) Scale
Time Frame: At 2 years after surgery
|
The ADLS is a 14 item scale that queries patients about how their knee symptoms effect their ability to perform general daily activities (6 items) as well as how their knee condition effects their ability to perform specific functional tasks (8 items).
Each item is scored 0-5 with 5 indicating "no difficulty" and 0 representing "unable to perform".
The highest possible score is 70.
The scores of all items are summed, divided by 70, then multiplied by 100 to give an overall ADLS percent rating.
Higher percentages reflect higher levels of functional ability.
This scale would be appropriate for patients who either do not participate in sports or recreational activities or for those who have not yet progressed to performing these activities
|
At 2 years after surgery
|
|
Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living (KOS-ADLS) Scale
Time Frame: At 5 years after surgery
|
The ADLS is a 14 item scale that queries patients about how their knee symptoms effect their ability to perform general daily activities (6 items) as well as how their knee condition effects their ability to perform specific functional tasks (8 items).
Each item is scored 0-5 with 5 indicating "no difficulty" and 0 representing "unable to perform".
The highest possible score is 70.
The scores of all items are summed, divided by 70, then multiplied by 100 to give an overall ADLS percent rating.
Higher percentages reflect higher levels of functional ability.
This scale would be appropriate for patients who either do not participate in sports or recreational activities or for those who have not yet progressed to performing these activities
|
At 5 years after surgery
|
|
Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living (KOS-ADLS) Scale
Time Frame: At 10 years after surgery
|
The ADLS is a 14 item scale that queries patients about how their knee symptoms effect their ability to perform general daily activities (6 items) as well as how their knee condition effects their ability to perform specific functional tasks (8 items).
Each item is scored 0-5 with 5 indicating "no difficulty" and 0 representing "unable to perform".
The highest possible score is 70.
The scores of all items are summed, divided by 70, then multiplied by 100 to give an overall ADLS percent rating.
Higher percentages reflect higher levels of functional ability.
This scale would be appropriate for patients who either do not participate in sports or recreational activities or for those who have not yet progressed to performing these activities
|
At 10 years after surgery
|
|
Knee laxity
Time Frame: At 5 years after surgery
|
The side to side knee joint laxity of patients after anterior cruciate ligament surgery can be divided into four grades: grade A: -1~2mm(0+), grade B: 3~5mm (1+), grade C: 6~10mm (2+) and D Grade: >10mm(3+) assessed by Lachman test of physical examination.
|
At 5 years after surgery
|
|
Knee laxity
Time Frame: At 10 years after surgery
|
The side to side knee joint laxity of patients after anterior cruciate ligament surgery can be divided into four grades: grade A: -1~2mm(0+), grade B: 3~5mm (1+), grade C: 6~10mm (2+) and D Grade: >10mm(3+) assessed by Lachman test of physical examination.
|
At 10 years after surgery
|
|
Quadriceps strength
Time Frame: At 5 years after surgery
|
Side to side quadriceps strength assessed by Biodex arthrometer test
|
At 5 years after surgery
|
|
Quadriceps strength
Time Frame: At 10 years after surgery
|
Side to side quadriceps strength assessed by Biodex arthrometer test
|
At 10 years after surgery
|
|
Lysholm score
Time Frame: At 2 years after surgery
|
Patients will be asked to fill out the Lysholm score to document the functional status.
The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
At 2 years after surgery
|
|
Lysholm score
Time Frame: At 5 years after surgery
|
Patients will be asked to fill out the Lysholm score to document the functional status.
The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
At 5 years after surgery
|
|
Lysholm score
Time Frame: At 10 years after surgery
|
Patients will be asked to fill out the Lysholm score to document the functional status.
The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
At 10 years after surgery
|
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: At 2 years after surgery
|
Patients will be asked to fill out the KOOS score to document the functional status.
The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
At 2 years after surgery
|
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: At 5 years after surgery
|
Patients will be asked to fill out the KOOS score to document the functional status.
The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
At 5 years after surgery
|
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: At 10 years after surgery
|
Patients will be asked to fill out the KOOS score to document the functional status.
The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
At 10 years after surgery
|
|
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form 2000
Time Frame: At 5 years after surgery
|
Patients will be asked to fill out the IKDC2000 score to document the functional status.
The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
At 5 years after surgery
|
|
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form 2000
Time Frame: At 10 years after surgery
|
Patients will be asked to fill out the IKDC2000 score to document the functional status.
The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
At 10 years after surgery
|
|
Tegner Score
Time Frame: At 2 years after surgery
|
Patients will be asked to fill out the Tegner score to document the functional status.
The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 10.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
At 2 years after surgery
|
|
Tegner Score
Time Frame: At 5 years after surgery
|
Patients will be asked to fill out the Tegner score to document the functional status.
The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 10.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
At 5 years after surgery
|
|
Tegner Score
Time Frame: At 10 years after surgery
|
Patients will be asked to fill out the Tegner score to document the functional status.
The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 10.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
At 10 years after surgery
|
|
Short Form (SF)-36,The medical outcome study 36-items short form health survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: At 2 years after surgery
|
Patients will be asked to fill out the SF-36 to document the quality of life .
General health-related quality of life: SF-36 physical component score (range 0 to 100; higher score = better health state) at 2 yearsTh minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
At 2 years after surgery
|
|
Short Form (SF)-36 ,The medical outcome study 36-items short form health survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: At 5 years after surgery
|
Patients will be asked to fill out the SF-36 to document the quality of life.General health-related quality of life: SF-36 physical component score (range 0 to 100; higher score = better health state) at 5 years.
The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
At 5 years after surgery
|
|
Short Form (SF)-36,The medical outcome study 36-items short form health survey
Time Frame: At 10 years after surgery
|
Patients will be asked to fill out the SF-36 to document the quality of life.General health-related quality of life: SF-36 physical component score (range 0 to 100; higher score = better health state) at 10 years.
The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
At 10 years after surgery
|
|
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Time Frame: At 5 years after surgery
|
The difference in signal density between reconstructed ACL and PCL was used to measure graft ligamentation on MRI.
Higher signal values represent higher inflammation and lower signal values represent better ligamentation.
|
At 5 years after surgery
|
|
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Time Frame: At 10 years after surgery
|
The difference in signal density between reconstructed ACL and PCL was used to measure graft ligamentation on MRI.
Higher signal values represent higher inflammation and lower signal values represent better ligamentation.
|
At 10 years after surgery
|
|
Knee laxity (KT-2000 arthrometer)
Time Frame: At 5 years after surgery
|
The knee laxity test of the forward KT-2000 measured knee laxity at pressures of 132Nt, 88Nt, 66Nt, and 44Nt, respectively, while the back-pushing KT-2000 was measured at -132NT, 88Nt, 66Nt, and -44Nt. The foward-pushing KT-2000 asessed side-to-side can be stratified into five levels are (A) < - 1 mm, (B) - 1 to 1 mm, (C) 1-3 mm, (D) 3-5 mm and (E) > 5 mm. The back-pushing KT-2000 is also divided into side to side differences as (A) < - 2 mm, (B) - 2 to - 0.5 mm, (C) - 0.5 to 0.5 mm, (D) 0.5-1 mm and ( E) > 1 mm. |
At 5 years after surgery
|
|
Knee laxity (KT-2000 arthrometer)
Time Frame: At 10 years after surgery
|
The knee laxity test of the forward KT-2000 measured knee laxity at pressures of 132Nt, 88Nt, 66Nt, and 44Nt, respectively, while the back-pushing KT-2000 was measured at -132NT, 88Nt, 66Nt, and -44Nt. The foward-pushing KT-2000 asessed side-to-side can be stratified into five levels are (A) < - 1 mm, (B) - 1 to 1 mm, (C) 1-3 mm, (D) 3-5 mm and (E) > 5 mm. The back-pushing KT-2000 is also divided into side to side differences as (A) < - 2 mm, (B) - 2 to - 0.5 mm, (C) - 0.5 to 0.5 mm, (D) 0.5-1 mm and ( E) > 1 mm. |
At 10 years after surgery
|
|
Computed tomography (CT)
Time Frame: At 1 days after surgery.(baseline)
|
Computed tomography was used to acquire a baseline of the bone tunnel one days after ACL reconstruction for comparison in studies of bone tunnel widening at follow-up visits.
|
At 1 days after surgery.(baseline)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ACLSurgRCT-20160601
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
-
Alexander Rofner-MorettiRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction | Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryAustria
-
Medical University of GrazCompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury | Knee Instability | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft FailureAustria
-
Haute Ecole ARC SanteCompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injury | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction RehabilitationSwitzerland
-
University of BathVersus ArthritisRecruitingPost-traumatic Osteoarthritis | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionUnited Kingdom
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearTurkey
-
Sanford HealthActive, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverChildren's Hospital ColoradoActive, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearUnited States
-
Universidad de GranadaRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injury | Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) ReconstructionSpain
-
Miach OrthopaedicsActive, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryUnited States
-
eMKa MED Medical CenterWroclaw Medical UniversityRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Knee Injuries | Knee Ligament InjuryPoland
Clinical Trials on Anatomical single-bundle reconstruction(ASBR method)
-
Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung HospitalNot yet recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliCompletedOsteoarthritis, Knee | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearItaly
-
Rafał KamińskiActive, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryPoland
-
Tampere University HospitalCompleted
-
Peking University Third HospitalUnknownRupture of Anterior Cruciate Ligament
-
University Medical Centre MariborActive, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionSlovenia
-
Indonesia UniversityUnknownAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Cartilage Damage | Knee InstabilityIndonesia
-
University of PittsburghNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)Completed
-
Assaf-Harofeh Medical CenterUnknownAnterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesTerminatedAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryFrance