Pilot Study Evaluating Outpatient Management of Tubo-ovarian Abscesses (AmbATO)

March 20, 2024 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Pelvic inflammatory diseases (PID) require antibiotic treatment. Among PID, the investigators distinguish: pelvi-peritonitis and pelvic collections such as Douglas abscess and/or tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA).

Recent recommendations published in December 2018 by the National College of French Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF) suggest that it is preferable to drain TOA when their size is greater than 3-4 cm. Ultrasound-guided transvaginal drainage is recommended as first-line treatment because of its ease of performance and its effectiveness. In the literature, many authors have demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of transvaginal drainage associated with antibiotics in the treatment of TOA. Since ultrasound-guided transvaginal drainage is a less invasive alternative therapeutic procedure than laparoscopy for the drainage of TOA, it would be compatible with outpatient management. This mode of management can be carried out in a dedicated outpatient or functional exploration room with the help of a nurse but without an anesthetic team present. This gesture is simple and short-lived. In addition, the antibiotics used have pharmacological properties allowing oral intake from their initiation.

The investigators have proposed a new service protocol to treat TOA in this outpatient mode. The investigators therefore wish to analyze this new protocol from these three angles: 1/ the feasibility of this care, 2/ the quality of life of the patients through questionnaires given throughout the care and 3/ an evaluation of the 'efficiency.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pelvic inflammatory diseases (PID) require antibiotic treatment. Among PID, the investigators distinguish: pelvi-peritonitis and pelvic collections such as Douglas abscess and/or tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA).

Recent recommendations published in December 2018 by the National College of French Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF) suggest that it is preferable to drain TOA when their size is greater than 3-4 cm. Ultrasound-guided transvaginal drainage is recommended as first-line treatment because of its ease of performance and its effectiveness. In the literature, many authors have demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of transvaginal drainage associated with antibiotics in the treatment of TOA. Since ultrasound-guided transvaginal drainage is a less invasive alternative therapeutic procedure than laparoscopy for the drainage of TOA, it would be compatible with outpatient management. This mode of management can be carried out in a dedicated outpatient or functional exploration room with the help of a nurse but without an anesthetic team present. This gesture is simple and short-lived. In addition, the antibiotics used have pharmacological properties allowing oral intake from their initiation.

The investigators have proposed a new service protocol to treat TOA in this outpatient mode. The investigators therefore wish to analyze this new protocol from these three angles: 1/ the feasibility of this care, 2/ the quality of life of the patients through questionnaires given throughout the care and 3/ an evaluation of the 'efficiency.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Nantes, France
        • Recruiting
        • Chu Nantes
        • Contact:
          • Vincent DOCHEZ

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient with diagnosis of TOA with a latero-uterine mass measuring at least 3 cm

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Major patient at the time of inclusion
  • Patient with diagnosis of TOA with a latero-uterine mass measuring at least 3 cm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with severity criteria requiring hospitalization:

    • Clinical severity criteria: haemodynamically unstable patient, septic shock, defense or contracture, sepsis, pelviperitonitis
    • Comorbidities: diabetic imbalance, curative anticoagulation
  • Patient with a formal indication for laparoscopy:

    • Diagnostic doubt with suspicion of an associated oncological or digestive pathology
    • Presence of an intra-abdominal intrauterine device (IUD)
    • Abscess not accessible vaginally
  • Patient who does not meet the eligibility criteria for outpatient hospitalization defined by French High Autority of Health
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
  • Patient does not speak French
  • Patient not benefiting from social security coverage
  • Current pregnancy
  • Confirmed allergy to one of the antibiotics (ceftriaxone, metronidazole or doxycycline)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
prospective group - ultrasound transvaginal drainage
Patients with TOA with ultrasound-guided transvaginal drainage with outpatient management
Ultrasound-guided transvaginal drainage of TOA by a puncture under simple sedation or analgesia with/or under general anesthesia
retrospective group - ultrasound transvaginal drainage
Patients with TOA in 2016, 2017 and 2018 with ultrasound-guided transvaginal drainage in conventional hospitalization
Ultrasound-guided transvaginal drainage of TOA by a puncture under simple sedation or analgesia with/or under general anesthesia
retrospective group - laparoscopy
Patients with TOA in 2016, 2017 and 2018 with laparoscopy in conventional hospitalization
Laparoscopy for drainage of TOA under general anesthesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cure rate
Time Frame: one month

The cure rate is defined by a composite criterion at 1 month of the procedure:

  • Apyrexia (temperature <38,0°c)
  • Absence of re-intervention for pelvic collection (TOA) in the month following the transvaginal drainage
  • Absence of second-line antibiotic therapy, extension, new antibiotic in the month following the transvaginal drainage
one month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
eligibility
Time Frame: 2 years
Number of patients included in the protocol compared to the number of eligible patients
2 years
Discharge
Time Frame: 2 years
Discharge from hospital within 24 hours of the drainage
2 years
Rehospitalization
Time Frame: 1 month
Rehospitalization: reason, duration and care
1 month
Measure of Pain
Time Frame: 1 month
Pain is assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10). Absence of pain (EN=0/10), mild pain (EN<4/10), absence of metrorrhagia and absence of leucorrhoea
1 month
residual mass
Time Frame: 1 month
Absence of residual mass ≥ 3cm on pelvic ultrasound
1 month
complications
Time Frame: 1 month
Presence of complications (digestive, urinary, parietal)
1 month
antibiotic therapy
Time Frame: 1 month
Change of antibiotic therapy (except adequate adaptation to the antibiogram). Change of antibiotic therapy is assessed by the need to add another antibiotic with a broader spectrum of action, following a poor clinical or biological evolution.
1 month
Quality of life with EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: 1 month
Satisfaction and Quality of life completed by the patients on the day of the drainage before the procedure, at 48 hours and at 1 month
1 month
Quality of life with Medical Outcome Study Short Form 12 (SF12)
Time Frame: 1 month

Satisfaction and Quality of life, questionnaires completed by the patients on the day of the drainage before the procedure, at 48 hours and at 1 month.

Each question is assessed on a Likert scale, with 5 to 6 possible levels of response possible responses. The 8 dimensions combine synthetic information to calculate a physical composite score (PCS) and a mental score (SCP) and a mental composite score (SCM). The higher the score, the greater the patient's ability.

1 month
Quality of life with Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaires
Time Frame: 1 month
Satisfaction and Quality of life , questionnaires completed by the patients on the day of the drainage before the procedure, at 48 hours and at 1 month The PGI-I is a transition scale that is a single question asking the patient to rate their urinary tract condition now, as compared with how it was prior to before beginning treatment on a scale from 1. Very much better to 7. Very much worse.
1 month
Evaluation of the direct costs
Time Frame: 1 month
Evaluation of the direct costs of care for the 3 treatment strategies for complicated IGH of the ATO type, according to a time horizon of 1 month and a collective perspective
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Abscess

Clinical Trials on ultrasound transvaginal drainage

Subscribe