Cervicothoracic Junction Mobilization Versus Eccentric Muscle Energy Technique in Mechanical Cervical Pain

June 7, 2022 updated by: Riphah International University

Effects of Cervicothoracic Junction Mobilization Versus Eccentric Muscle Energy Technique in the Treatment of Mechanical Cervical Pain

  1. To compare the effectiveness of the cervicothoracic junction mobilization and eccentric muscle energy technique on mechanical cervical pain.
  2. To compare the effectiveness of the cervicothoracic junction mobilization and eccentric muscle energy technique on cervical disability.
  3. To compare the effectiveness of the cervicothoracic junction mobilization and eccentric muscle energy technique on cervical ROM.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • ICT
      • Islamabad, ICT, Pakistan, 44000
        • Riphah International University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants falling in this category would be recruited into the study.

    1. Females
    2. Age between 18-45 years.
    3. Diagnosed with mechanical cervical pain.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant failing to fall in this category would be excluded of the study.

    1. Pregnant Females
    2. Any previous history of trauma or surgery
    3. Diagnosed with mechanical cervical pain due to disc herniation, radiculopathy or any other cervical malignancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Cervicothoracic Junction Mobilization Technique

It is a part of manual therapy technique. Maitland mobilization to the C7- T1 level, according to their primary movement restriction (for flexion-extension restriction- central PA glide, for rotation restrictions unilateral PA glide) is given.For central PA glide, a central pressure angled towards the participant's head was given with overlapping thumbs of the therapist placed on the spinous process of C7.

Dosage:

Glide would be given according to the nature, intensity and severity of the patient's pain. 30 sec bouts with 3 sets & 2 reps. Total 2-3 min duration. 2 sessions per week for 3 weeks.

It is a part of manual therapy technique. Patient would be in prone position with his forehead in the palm of the therapist. Maitland mobilization to the C7- T1 level, according to their primary movement restriction (for flexion-extension restriction- central PA glide, for rotation restrictions unilateral PA glide) is given. For central PA glide, a central pressure angled towards the participant's head was given with overlapping thumbs of the therapist placed on the spinous process of C7. The therapist's thumbs were placed on the posterior surface of the articular process to be mobilized (C7 on the side of restriction), and anteriorly directed oscillatory pressure was applied for unilateral PA mobilization.
EXPERIMENTAL: Eccentric Muscle Energy Technique

Eccentric muscle energy technique would be applied to the patient's cervical spine. The cervical spine would be brought to the barrier of motion in each plane i.e. flexion/extension, lateral bending and rotation. Then patient would be asked to push their heads into the direction opposite that of the barrier.

Dosage:

The therapist provided isometric resistance for 3- 5 seconds, after which the subjects relaxed their muscles completely and the therapist applied stretch. This is applied for generalized cervical movements in each plane like Flexion, Extension, Side Bending

& Rotation. 3-5 repetitions with 2-3 sets were performed. Total duration: 3-5 min 2 sessions per week for 3 weeks.

Eccentric muscle energy technique would be applied to the patient's cervical spine. The cervical spine would be brought to the barrier of motion in each plane i.e. flexion/extension, lateral bending and rotation. Then patient would be asked to push their heads into the direction opposite that of the barrier.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 3 Weeks
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a measurement instrument that tries to measure a characteristic or attitude that is believed to range across a continuum of values and cannot easily be directly measured. It is often used in epidemiologic and clinical research to measure the intensity or frequency of various symptoms. It is a straight horizontal line of fixed length, usually 100 mm. The ends are defined as the extreme limits of the parameter to be measured (symptom, pain, health) orientated from the left (worst) to the right (best). Test-retest reliability has been shown to be good, but higher among literate (r= 0.94)
3 Weeks
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time Frame: 3 Weeks
This questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how your neck pain has affected your ability to manage in everyday life. Patient-completed, condition-specific, functional status questionnaire with 10 items including pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation. Each section is scored on a 0 to 5 rating scale, in which zero means "no pain" and 5 means "Worst imaginable pain". It has highest score of 50.
3 Weeks
Cervical Goniometer
Time Frame: 3 Weeks
A goniometer is an instrument which measures the available range of motion atjoint. Goniometer have different types; the most use is the universal standard goniometer, which is either made with plastic or metal tool. It consists of a stationary arm, a movable arm and a fulcrum.
3 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 25, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Ayesha Sadiq

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Cervicothoracic Junction Mobilization Technique

Subscribe