Brain Healthy Soul Food Diet Intervention Among Older African Americans (MIND+SOUL Diet)

September 30, 2025 updated by: University of Kansas Medical Center

Brain Healthy Soul Food Diet Intervention Among Older African Americans (Aim 2-3)

The primary goal of this project is to evaluate feasibility and acceptability of the MIND+SOUL diet and its implementation. Secondary goals of this project are to evaluate cardiovascular risk profile, nutritional health status, and cognition in relation to the MIND+SOUL diet intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a single arm trial designed to pilot test an adapted brain healthy diet intervention among older AA (n=30). Specifically, this study aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the brain healthy soul food diet intervention. As secondary outcomes, this study aims to assess body composition, cardiovascular risk, nutritional health status, and changes in cognition among older AA to form the basis of estimating power and sample size for a future full-scale randomized controlled clinical trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • University of Kansas Health System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Identify as African American or Black
  • Age 55 and older
  • English Proficient
  • 1 or more of the following CVD risk factors (high blood pressure, high cholesterol, overweight/obesity with a BMI of 25 or more)
  • Cognitively Normal with an AD8 <2 (normal cognition)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No CVD risk factors
  • AD8 equal to or greater than 2
  • Existing diet plan prescribed by a clinician
  • Non menopausal (because of DXA scan)
  • No internet connection
  • Uncontrolled hypertension, by history, or as indicated by supine systolic blood pressure >165 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >95 mmHg at the baseline visit. If an initial blood pressure reading is higher than this, an additional attempt (at this visit or on another day) could be used before excluding a patient for uncontrolled hypertension
  • Neurological diseases that impact cognition
  • Other medical conditions likely to be negatively impacted by a diet change or that could confound the study data
  • Unable or unwilling to provide written consent
  • PI determination that study is unsafe or unsuitable
  • Active depression as determined by a score of 5 or above on the PHQ9 and deemed to be clinically significant by the medical monitor

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MIND+SOUL Diet
The MIND+SOUL diet is an adapted brain-healthy soul food diet. Participants follow the diet for 12 weeks.
The MIND+SOUL Diet is an adapted brain-healthy soul food diet.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility: Retention Rate
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Feasibility will be assessed by retention rate. This will be calculated as the percentage of participants who complete all aspects of the intervention including cooking classes and coach directed dietary call support.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Fat Mass
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and 12 weeks; 12-week data reported
Total fat mass was assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to measure total fat mass. Assessments were conducted at baseline and again at the 12-week follow-up. The values reported below reflect the 12-week follow-up, with changes calculated from baseline to 12 weeks.
Assessed at baseline and 12 weeks; 12-week data reported
Android Fat Mass
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and 12 weeks; 12-week data reported
Android fat mass was assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to measure android fat mass. Assessments were conducted at baseline and again at the 12-week follow-up. The values reported below reflect the 12-week follow-up, with changes calculated from baseline to 12 weeks.
Assessed at baseline and 12 weeks; 12-week data reported
Waist Circumference
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and 12 weeks; 12-week data reported
Waist circumference was measured using a standard tape measure at baseline and 12 weeks. Data reported reflect 12-week follow-up values for participants who completed both time points.
Assessed at baseline and 12 weeks; 12-week data reported
Body Mass Index
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and 12 weeks; 12-week data reported
Body mass index was calculated using measured height and weight at baseline and 12 weeks. The value below reflects BMI at the 12-week follow-up for participants who completed both assessments.
Assessed at baseline and 12 weeks; 12-week data reported
Total Cholesterol
Time Frame: All cardiovascular risk prolife assessments will be collected at baseline and at the 12-week mark.
Cardiovascular risk profile will be measured by cholesterol. Cholesterol will be measured using the PTS Diagnostics Cardiocheck Plus Analyzer Cholesterol and Glucose Check.
All cardiovascular risk prolife assessments will be collected at baseline and at the 12-week mark.
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: All cardiovascular risk prolife assessments will be collected at baseline and at the 12-week mark.
Cardiovascular risk profile will be measured by systolic blood pressure. Blood pressure will be measured using the Omron 5 series blood pressure monitor. C
All cardiovascular risk prolife assessments will be collected at baseline and at the 12-week mark.
Skin Carotenoid Score (Veggie Meter) Skin Carotenoid Score (Veggie Meter) Skin Carotenoid Score (Veggie Meter)
Time Frame: Self-reported dietary intake was assessed at baseline and at the 12-week follow-up.
Skin carotenoid levels were assessed using the Veggie Meter®, which uses reflection spectroscopy to provide an objective measure of carotenoid-rich fruit and vegetable intake. Scores typically range from 0 to 800. Higher scores indicate higher carotenoid levels and greater intake of fruits and vegetables. Changes were evaluated from baseline to 12 weeks.
Self-reported dietary intake was assessed at baseline and at the 12-week follow-up.
Self-Reported Fruit and Vegetable Intake (NHANES Dietary Screener)
Time Frame: Self-reported dietary intake was assessed at baseline and at the 12-week follow-up
Self-reported fruit and vegetable intake was assessed using the NHANES Dietary Screener Questionnaire (DSQ). The DSQ estimates average daily intake in cups per day, based on participant-reported consumption over the past 30 days. There is no fixed score range; higher estimated intake reflects greater fruit and vegetable consumption and better nutritional health. Changes were assessed from baseline to 12 weeks.
Self-reported dietary intake was assessed at baseline and at the 12-week follow-up
Cognitive Function
Time Frame: Cognitive function was assessed at baseline and again at 12 weeks. The data table reports the outcome value from the 12-week time point.
Cognitive function was assessed using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery. The following assessments were administered to evaluate specific cognitive domains: NIH Toolbox List Sorting Working Memory Test (working memory), Picture Vocabulary Test (language), Oral Reading Recognition Test (reading), Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test (processing speed), and Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test (executive function). Each test yields a fully normed T-score ranging from 0 to 200, with a normative mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores reflect better cognitive performance. This outcome specifically focuses on changes in executive function, as measured by the Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test. Scores were collected at two time points: baseline and 12 weeks. The value reported in the data table reflects the mean score at 12 weeks.
Cognitive function was assessed at baseline and again at 12 weeks. The data table reports the outcome value from the 12-week time point.
Feasibility: Reasons for Refusal
Time Frame: Reasons for refusal were supposed to be tracked throughout the recruitment period, which lasted approximately three months, but were not tracked.
Feasibility was planned to be assessed by tracking reasons for refusal to participate during the recruitment phase. Staff aimed to document participant-reported reasons for non-enrollment during initial outreach and screening efforts, however staff did not document participant-reported reasons for non-enrollment.
Reasons for refusal were supposed to be tracked throughout the recruitment period, which lasted approximately three months, but were not tracked.
Satisfaction - Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: Satisfaction assessment will be conducted at the 12-week mark.
Satisfaction with the MIND+SOUL diet was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for overall program satisfaction. The Visual Analog Scale is a single-item self-report tool ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates the least amount of satisfaction and 10 indicates the highest level of satisfaction. Higher scores represent better outcomes, meaning greater satisfaction with the intervention.
Satisfaction assessment will be conducted at the 12-week mark.
Acceptability
Time Frame: Acceptability assessment will be conducted at the 12-week mark.
Acceptability of the MIND+SOUL intervention was assessed using a REDCap-administered online survey developed to evaluate participant perceptions across five domains: affective attitude, burden, ethicality, perceived effectiveness, and self-efficacy. The survey includes 20 items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score ranges from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability of the intervention. Scores were collected at the 12-week follow-up.
Acceptability assessment will be conducted at the 12-week mark.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on MIND+SOUL Diet

Subscribe