Knowledge and Perception of Evidence-based Psychology in Latin American Psychologists

June 13, 2022 updated by: Alejandro Hernández Posadas, Universidad Westhill, Facultad de Psicología

Knowledge and Perception of Evidence-based Psychology in Latin American Psychologist. A Cross-sectional Study.

This was a non-experimental, descriptive, prospective and cross-sectional study, for which the CHERRIES checklist was used to report the study in order to improve the quality of the report of such designs. The open-ended survey was voluntary, consisted of 18 items and four sections, the items were not randomized and the survey was estimated to last approximately five minutes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Sampling:

A non-experimental sampling is carried out by voluntary subjects, since the subjects will come to the study by a call for applications.

Sample size

The formula of infinite population of qualitative variables will be used, because we will work with ordinal variables and because the total number of observation units that integrate it is unknown or when its population is greater than 100,000 and the formula is the following:

The sample size for 100,000 people should be 384 people, so that 95% of the time the data you want to measure is in the interval ±5% with respect to the data observed in the evaluation.

Data management plan:

Data dictionary design

Training will be provided and data dictionary will be developed describing the properties of variables such as data type (e.g. string and number), variable size, data encoding, and constraints and validations attached to a given variable (Annex).

Data collection

The research data will be obtained through the Google forms, which has "SOC 2" accreditation that meet best practices and security, as they are transmitted over a secure HTTPS connection and that user logins were protected through TLS. Furthermore, data is encrypted using industry and research standard encryption algorithms.

Data Retention

The database will be generated in Excel for further analysis in R studio, which will be kept at the University on an encrypted USB stick for data security and the password to this stick will only be held by the project manager.

Standards that provide data integrity, accuracy and coherence

The International Classification of Diseases (ICD- 11) will be used to present data consistency, accuracy and completeness through the optimal definition of mental health entities. On the other hand, the standards for data use recommended by The Global Health Training Centre will be used:

(a) The column heading (variable) is not changed between data. b) The same terminology is maintained for all variables. c) There is a consistent format and standard definition for subject identification.

d) The name of the datasets is always the same. e) Name of the form / CRF section, e.g., demographic data f) A list of data objects (names and definitions) g) Description of the data element in natural language h) Detailed properties of the data elements (data type, size, nullability, optionality, indexes) i) Response options, e.g., check box, radio button, text j) Validation rule(s), e.g., required field, range checking k) Relationship of data elements to other data elements. l) Details about the privacy and security restrictions that should be associated with the element, e.g., Protected Health Information status.

Methodological guidelines for reporting the study:

The guide to improve the quality of methodological reporting of cross-sectional online studies called CHERRIE will be used.

Data analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the central tendency frequencies of the participants' characteristics. Non-parametric analyses will be applied because the data do not meet the criteria of normality in the analysis of their distribution, the type of variable and the number of participants; therefore, Spearman correlations will be used to contrast ordinal data. On the other hand, we plan to use odds ratio analysis to determine the possibility that knowledge of evidence-based psychology is present in one population group with more studies than in another.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1506

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ciudad de México, Mexico, 010
        • Westhill University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Latin American psychologists of all specialties and degrees of studies.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be an active psychology student at any university in Latin America.
  • To have completed at least one semester of the psychology degree program
  • Be between 18 and 65 years of age
  • Be able to read and write
  • Be a native Spanish speaker
  • Agree to participate voluntarily in the study.
  • Sign the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not currently residing in any Latin American country.
  • Those persons who have not studied psychology and are performing related activities.
  • Repeated IP (Internet Protocol)
  • Marginal frequencies in the sociodemographic data.
  • Participants who do not answer the complete scales.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knowledge of evidence-based PSychology
Time Frame: 1 month
To explore knowledge in evidence-based psychology, the studies conducted by the American Psychological Association (2005) and the studies conducted by Gaxiola-Pérez et al. (2019) were used as a basis, so that the components, phases that compose it, tools for critical reading and levels of evidence were questioned, in order to create a questionnaire of four items for the evaluation of knowledge, where the maximum score was four and the minimum value was zero.
1 month
Perception of Evidence-based Psychology
Time Frame: 1 month
The perception was assessed using a visual analog scale, according to the methodological recommendations for instruments that assess online perception and considered: a) Degree of familiarity, b) Importance attached to it, and c) Frequency with which it is applied.
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UW/FP/IC/PSICOLOGIA/2021/003

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

3
Subscribe