eHealth Delivery Alternative for Cancer Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer (eReach2)

January 15, 2026 updated by: Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine

A Randomized Hybrid Type I Effectiveness-Implementation Study of an eHealth Delivery Alternative for Cancer Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer

This randomized non-inferiority study will use a 2x2 design where traditional standard-of-care pre-test (visit 1) and post-test (visit 2: disclosure) counseling delivered by a genetic counselor are replaced with a self-directed web-based eHealth intervention to provide critical data to inform optimal ways to deliver clinical genetic testing in eligible individuals, while maintaining quality of care and favorable cognitive, affective and behavioral outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Germline cancer genetic testing has become a standard evidence-based practice, with established risk reduction and cancer screening guidelines for genetic carriers. Access to genetic specialists is limited in many areas in the US, and the traditional medical delivery model of pre- and post-test counseling with a genetic professional will not support the rising indications for genetic testing. Recent data from the National Health Interview Survey found that <20% of eligible patients with a personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer underwent genetic testing. Thus, there is an urgent need to consider alternative delivery models to increase access and uptake of genetic testing, while maintaining adequate patient cognitive, affective and behavioral outcomes.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of offering web-based eHealth delivery alternatives of pre/post-test genetic counseling to provide equal or improved timely uptake of genetic services and testing, and short-term cognitive (e.g. understanding), affective (e.g. distress and uncertainty) and behavioral (risk reducing and screening behaviors and communication to providers and relatives) outcomes in patients with barriers to genetic testing as compared to the traditional two-visit delivery model with a genetic counselor.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Recruiting
        • Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
        • Contact:
          • Angela Bradbury, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Speak and understand English
  • Male or Female
  • No prior germline genetic testing
  • Meet current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for germline genetic testing

Exclusion Criteria:

-Communication difficulties such as:

  • Uncorrected or uncompensated hearing and/or vision impairment
  • Uncorrected or uncompensated speech defects
  • Uncontrolled psychiatric/mental condition or severe physical, neurological or cognitive deficits rendering individual unable to understand study goals and tasks

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ARM D

Visit 1/Pre-Test Session - Self-directed web-based eHealth pre-test session intervention.

Visit 2/Disclosure Session - Self-directed web-based eHealth result disclosure intervention.

Secure and accessible by private code only, the web-based intervention will provide users with a the results of their clinical genetic testing results and a detailed summary of what those results mean. Additionally, an individualized summary will also be included.
Secure and accessible by private code only, the web-based intervention will provide users with a the results of their clinical genetic testing results and a detailed summary of what those results mean. Additionally, an individualized summary will also be included.
Experimental: ARM A

Visit 1/Pre-Test Session - Standard-of-Care Pre-Test Counseling with a genetic counselor.

Visit 2/Disclosure Session - Standard-of-Care Post-Test Counseling with a genetic counselor.

Standard of Care with a Genetic Counselor by Remote Services
Experimental: ARM B

Visit 1/Pre-Test Session - Standard-of-Care Pre-Test Counseling with a genetic counselor.

Visit 2/Disclosure Session - Self-directed web-based eHealth result disclosure intervention.

Standard of Care with a Genetic Counselor by Remote Services
Secure and accessible by private code only, the web-based intervention will provide users with a the results of their clinical genetic testing results and a detailed summary of what those results mean. Additionally, an individualized summary will also be included.
Experimental: ARM C

Visit 1/Pre-Test Session - Self-directed web-based eHealth pre-test session intervention.

Visit 2/Disclosure Session - Standard-of-Care Post-Test Counseling with a genetic counselor.

Standard of Care with a Genetic Counselor by Remote Services
Secure and accessible by private code only, the web-based intervention will provide users with a the results of their clinical genetic testing results and a detailed summary of what those results mean. Additionally, an individualized summary will also be included.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The KnowGene Scale
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in Knowledge - Score Range = 0-16, Higher score = Better outcome
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in General Anxiety - Score Range = 4-20, Lower score = Better outcome
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Uptake of Genetic Services
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Testing uptake per arm - Yes/No
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in General Depression - Score Range = 4-20, Lower score = Better outcome
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Impact of Events Scale (IES)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in Cancer Specific Distress - Score Range = 0-40, Lower score = Better outcome
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Multi-dimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment Questionnaire (MICRA)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in Uncertainty - Score Range = 0-85, Lower score = Better outcome
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Satisfaction with genetic services
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Differences in satisfaction by Arm - Score Range = 14-70, Higher score = Better outcome
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Decisional Regret Scale
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Differences in decisional regret by Arm - Score Range = 5-25, Lower score = Better outcome
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Provider Time
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Time (minutes) provider spends per patient
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Angela R Bradbury, MD, University of Pennsylvania

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 28, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 24, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 13021
  • 850242 (Other Identifier: University of Pennsylvania IRB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Standard of Care

Subscribe