Whole Genome Sequencing (ChromoSeq) as an Adjunct to Conventional Genomic Profiling in MDS

December 5, 2025 updated by: Washington University School of Medicine

A Prospective Study of Whole Genome Sequencing (ChromoSeq) as an Adjunct to Conventional Genomic Profiling in MDS

This is a single institution, prospective study of the whole genome sequencing assay, ChromoSeq. Using prospectively collected patient data, coupled with physician surveys, the investigators seek to determine the feasibility of implementing ChromoSeq in addition to standard genomic testing, for patients with the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Meagan A Jacoby, M.D., Ph.D.
  • Phone Number: 314-362-9405
  • Email: mjacoby@wustl.edu

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Recruiting
        • Washington University School of Medicine
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Meagan A Jacoby, M.D., Ph.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Matthew J Walter, M.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • David H Spencer, M.D., Ph.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mary C Politi, Ph.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Matthew Schuelke

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria Patient:

  • Diagnosis of MDS, or a clinical suspicion for a new diagnosis of MDS, for whom routine diagnostic testing is requested or planned to be requested.
  • Seen in the outpatient setting.
  • Not been previously treated with disease-modifying therapy (such as lenalidomide or hypomethylating agents).

Note: Patients who have received transfusional support, erythropoietin-stimulating agents, growth factor support, or luspatercept are eligible.

At least 18 years of age.

-Able to understand and willing to sign an IRB approved written informed consent document.

Inclusion Criteria Physician:

  • Treating physician at Washington University School of Medicine who directs therapy for individuals with hematologic malignancies.
  • Able and willing to complete standardized questionnaires about stakeholder perceptions of ChromoSeq during the ChromoSeq implementation process. (Written documentation of informed consent is not required.)

Exclusion Criteria Patient:

-Younger than 18 years of age

Exclusion Criteria Physician

-Does not treat patients at Washington University School of Medicine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients: ChromSeq
ChromoSeq will be performed on bone marrow or peripheral blood DNA from consented patients in parallel with the standard of care cytogenetics, FISH, and the MyeloSeq gene panel obtained from that sample, in a CLIA licensed environment using CLIA-compliant ChromoSeq procedures.
Novel, streamlined whole genome sequencing approach
No Intervention: Stakeholders (Treating Physicians)
Stakeholders (treating physicians) will complete surveys/questionnaires

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of assay success on first attempt between ChromoSeq and conventional cytogenetics as measured by total number of recurrent structural variants identified
Time Frame: Through completion of all ChromoSeq tests (estimated to be 24 months)
-The number of recurrent structural variants detected by ChromoSeq will be compared to those detected by conventional cytogenetics using two non-inferiority tests for dependent samples using non-inferiority margin of 1%.
Through completion of all ChromoSeq tests (estimated to be 24 months)
Rate of assay success on first attempt between ChromoSeq and conventional cytogenetics as measured by total number of copy number alterations identified
Time Frame: Through completion of all ChromoSeq tests (estimated to be 24 months)
The number of copy number alterations detected by ChromoSeq will be compared to those detected by conventional cytogenetics using two non-inferiority tests for dependent samples using non-inferiority margin of 1%.
Through completion of all ChromoSeq tests (estimated to be 24 months)
Proportion of failed ChromoSeq assays
Time Frame: Through completion of all ChromoSeq tests (estimated to be 24 months)
  • As compared to failed standard of care genomic profiling assays
  • The proportion of first-run failures for ChromoSeq assays will be compared to the proportion of failed standard of care genomic profiling assays using a directional Fisher's exact test.
Through completion of all ChromoSeq tests (estimated to be 24 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stakeholder perceptions of ChromoSeq
Time Frame: Through 1 month after generation of ChromoSeq for all patients enrolled (estimated to be 25 months)
  • Using survey responses from treating physicians obtained from per case standardized questionnaires designed using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research constructs
  • For each case, the corresponding treating physician will be asked to answer a case-based ChromoSeq Implementation Physician Survey. In order to prospectively investigate how the ChromoSeq data was used or could be used by the treating physician for each case, and to evaluate perceptions in real time, the physician will be asked to complete the survey within 1 month of the ChromoSeq and completed conventional genomic profiling results being returned to the chart, whichever is later.
Through 1 month after generation of ChromoSeq for all patients enrolled (estimated to be 25 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Meagan A Jacoby, M.D., Ph.D., Washington University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 27, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 202206077
  • UH3CA272904 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal may submit proposals to mjacoby@wustl.edu. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Clinical Trials on ChromoSeq

Subscribe