Effect of Modulated Auditory Stimulation on Interaural Auditory Perception

November 1, 2022 updated by: Francisco Germain, University of Alcala

Effect of an Equalizer-modulated Auditory Intervention on the Asymmetry of Interaural Auditory Perception in Groups of Different Emotional States

This study analyzes the effect of an equalizer-modulated auditory intervention on the asymmetry of interaural auditory perception in groups with different emotional states such as well-being, anxiety, depression and mixed anxiety-depression.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The present study follows a randomized, double-blind (investigator and outcome assessor), parallel and controlled design. The auditory intervention consisted of listening to classical music modulated by an equalizer for 30 minutes, 2 sessions a day separated by at least 3 hours, for 10 days (Monday to Friday for 2 weeks). Participants assigned to the control group are cited to the Health centre, but they do not received any intervention. These subjects follow the same evaluation and data collection process.

Once randomized, all participants will make a first control visit in which a pure-tone audiometry was carry out and completed the various psychiatric evaluation tests to classify into different groups: Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale (GADS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), and Sociodemographic variables (age, gender, nationality, education, working status, noise exposure, use of ear protection, and present or past use of any analgesic, anxiolytic or antidepressant for longer than a week).

The study variables collected at 3 months were pure-tone audiometry (air conduction).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

233

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Madrid
      • Alcalá De Henares, Madrid, Spain, 28805
        • University of Alcala

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

31 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Recruited from Health Centre Mejorada del Campo (Madrid, Spain)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having significant hearing loss
  • Having acute otological process
  • Having psychotic disease
  • Having epilepsy
  • Having serious illness
  • Having pregnancy
  • Used to try alcohol or drugs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
Participants assigned to the control group are cited to the Health centre, but they do not suffer any intervention. These subjects followed the same evaluation and data collection process.
Active Comparator: Auditory intervention filter-modulated
Participants assigned to this group listened classical music modulated by an equalizer for 30 minutes, 2 sessions a day separated by at least 3 hours, for 10 days (Monday to Friday for 2 weeks).

Intervention consisted of listening to classical music modulated by an equalizer for 30 minutes, 2 sessions a day separated by at least 3 hours, for 10 days (Monday to Friday for 2 weeks).

The musical intervention was always performed with the same songs and in the same order using original CDs, heard through headphones (Beyerdynamic, DT 250 / 80 ohm. GMBH & Co. KG, Theresienstr. 8 D-74072 Heilbronn, Germany). The music was played with a sound system (Panasonic MASH, No. SA-PM24. Hamburg, Germany). and filtered through an equalizer called Earducator (Hollagen Designs, PÍO. Box 43 7864 Bergvliet W.Cape - South Africa) that modulates music by alternating low and high tones with an unpredictable cadence, preventing habituation. It also allows very narrow band complementary filters to attenuate (by about 40 dB) abnormally perceived frequencies (hyper-hearing peaks): filters in: 1 kHz - 1,5 kHz - 2kHz - 3 kHz - 4 kHz - 8kHz.

Other Names:
  • Bérard´s method

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 125 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 125 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 250 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 250 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 500 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 500 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 750 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 750 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 1000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 1000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 1500 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 1500 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 2000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 2000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 3000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 3000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 4000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 4000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 6000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 6000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 8000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 8000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
Anxiety and depression level on the Goldberg scale
Time Frame: One month
To discriminate between these two entities. The following cut-off points were used: a total Anxiety score > 4 detects 73% of all cases of anxiety; a total Depression score >3 detects 82% of all cases of depression
One month
Anxiety level on the Hamilton scale
Time Frame: One month
It is a clinician-administered scale on which each item is rated from 0 to 4. It yields a score in the range of 0 to 56. The following cut-off points were used: 0-5 points (No anxiety), >5 points (Anxiety).
One month
Depression level on the Hamilton scale
Time Frame: One month
Each item is rated on a three- or five-point scale, with a score from 0 to 2 or 0 to 4, respectively. It yields a total score in the range of 0 to 52. The following cut-off points were used to assess depression: No depression: 0-7; Depression: >7
One month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 125 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
Three months between the first and second measure
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 250 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
Three months between the first and second measure
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 500 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
Three months between the first and second measure
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 750 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
Three months between the first and second measure
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 1000 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
Three months between the first and second measure
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 1500 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
Three months between the first and second measure
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 2000 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
Three months between the first and second measure
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 3000 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
Three months between the first and second measure
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 4000 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
Three months between the first and second measure
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 6000 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
Three months between the first and second measure
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 8000 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
Three months between the first and second measure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Beatriz Estalayo-Gutierrez, MD, PhD, University of Alcala

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 17, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 19, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 21, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asymmetric Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Clinical Trials on Auditory intervention filter-modulated group

3
Subscribe