- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05441891
Effect of Modulated Auditory Stimulation on Interaural Auditory Perception
Effect of an Equalizer-modulated Auditory Intervention on the Asymmetry of Interaural Auditory Perception in Groups of Different Emotional States
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The present study follows a randomized, double-blind (investigator and outcome assessor), parallel and controlled design. The auditory intervention consisted of listening to classical music modulated by an equalizer for 30 minutes, 2 sessions a day separated by at least 3 hours, for 10 days (Monday to Friday for 2 weeks). Participants assigned to the control group are cited to the Health centre, but they do not received any intervention. These subjects follow the same evaluation and data collection process.
Once randomized, all participants will make a first control visit in which a pure-tone audiometry was carry out and completed the various psychiatric evaluation tests to classify into different groups: Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale (GADS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), and Sociodemographic variables (age, gender, nationality, education, working status, noise exposure, use of ear protection, and present or past use of any analgesic, anxiolytic or antidepressant for longer than a week).
The study variables collected at 3 months were pure-tone audiometry (air conduction).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Madrid
-
Alcalá De Henares, Madrid, Spain, 28805
- University of Alcala
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Recruited from Health Centre Mejorada del Campo (Madrid, Spain)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having significant hearing loss
- Having acute otological process
- Having psychotic disease
- Having epilepsy
- Having serious illness
- Having pregnancy
- Used to try alcohol or drugs
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Control group
Participants assigned to the control group are cited to the Health centre, but they do not suffer any intervention.
These subjects followed the same evaluation and data collection process.
|
|
Active Comparator: Auditory intervention filter-modulated
Participants assigned to this group listened classical music modulated by an equalizer for 30 minutes, 2 sessions a day separated by at least 3 hours, for 10 days (Monday to Friday for 2 weeks).
|
Intervention consisted of listening to classical music modulated by an equalizer for 30 minutes, 2 sessions a day separated by at least 3 hours, for 10 days (Monday to Friday for 2 weeks). The musical intervention was always performed with the same songs and in the same order using original CDs, heard through headphones (Beyerdynamic, DT 250 / 80 ohm. GMBH & Co. KG, Theresienstr. 8 D-74072 Heilbronn, Germany). The music was played with a sound system (Panasonic MASH, No. SA-PM24. Hamburg, Germany). and filtered through an equalizer called Earducator (Hollagen Designs, PÍO. Box 43 7864 Bergvliet W.Cape - South Africa) that modulates music by alternating low and high tones with an unpredictable cadence, preventing habituation. It also allows very narrow band complementary filters to attenuate (by about 40 dB) abnormally perceived frequencies (hyper-hearing peaks): filters in: 1 kHz - 1,5 kHz - 2kHz - 3 kHz - 4 kHz - 8kHz.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 125 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 125 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 250 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 250 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 500 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 500 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 750 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 750 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 1000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 1000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 1500 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 1500 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 2000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 2000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 3000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 3000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 4000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 4000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 6000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 6000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 8000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three months
Time Frame: Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 8000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
|
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months
|
Anxiety and depression level on the Goldberg scale
Time Frame: One month
|
To discriminate between these two entities.
The following cut-off points were used: a total Anxiety score > 4 detects 73% of all cases of anxiety; a total Depression score >3 detects 82% of all cases of depression
|
One month
|
Anxiety level on the Hamilton scale
Time Frame: One month
|
It is a clinician-administered scale on which each item is rated from 0 to 4. It yields a score in the range of 0 to 56.
The following cut-off points were used: 0-5 points (No anxiety), >5 points (Anxiety).
|
One month
|
Depression level on the Hamilton scale
Time Frame: One month
|
Each item is rated on a three- or five-point scale, with a score from 0 to 2 or 0 to 4, respectively.
It yields a total score in the range of 0 to 52.
The following cut-off points were used to assess depression: No depression: 0-7; Depression: >7
|
One month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 125 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
|
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other.
If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
|
Three months between the first and second measure
|
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 250 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
|
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other.
If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
|
Three months between the first and second measure
|
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 500 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
|
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other.
If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
|
Three months between the first and second measure
|
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 750 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
|
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other.
If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
|
Three months between the first and second measure
|
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 1000 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
|
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other.
If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
|
Three months between the first and second measure
|
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 1500 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
|
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other.
If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
|
Three months between the first and second measure
|
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 2000 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
|
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other.
If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
|
Three months between the first and second measure
|
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 3000 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
|
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other.
If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
|
Three months between the first and second measure
|
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 4000 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
|
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other.
If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
|
Three months between the first and second measure
|
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 6000 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
|
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other.
If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
|
Three months between the first and second measure
|
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 8000 Hz
Time Frame: Three months between the first and second measure
|
Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other.
If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
|
Three months between the first and second measure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Beatriz Estalayo-Gutierrez, MD, PhD, University of Alcala
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Frassle S, Paulus FM, Krach S, Schweinberger SR, Stephan KE, Jansen A. Mechanisms of hemispheric lateralization: Asymmetric interhemispheric recruitment in the face perception network. Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 1;124(Pt A):977-988. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.055. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
- Brancucci A, Babiloni C, Rossini PM, Romani GL. Right hemisphere specialization for intensity discrimination of musical and speech sounds. Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(13):1916-23. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.03.005. Epub 2005 Mar 21.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CREC/UH/2022/05
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Asymmetric Sensorineural Hearing Loss
-
Oticon MedicalNot yet recruitingSensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Severe | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Profound
-
Otologics LLCUnknownMixed Conductive and Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral
-
CochlearCompletedUnilateral Mixed Conductive and Sensorineural Hearing Loss (Diagnosis) | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Unilateral With Normal Hearing on the Contralateral SideCanada
-
University College, LondonUnknownSensorineural Hearing Loss | Sensory Hearing Loss | Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Left Ear | Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Right Ear | Sensorineural HearingUnited Kingdom
-
Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la...RecruitingBilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss | Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing LossSpain
-
University Hospital, AntwerpCochlearRecruitingHearing Loss, Unilateral | Cochlear Implants | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Severe | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Bilateral | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, ProfoundBelgium
-
Auris Medical, Inc.TerminatedHearing Loss, Idiopathic Sudden SensorineuralUnited States, Korea, Republic of, Canada
-
Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of ManchesterCompletedCochlear Hearing Loss | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, BilateralUnited Kingdom
-
Cochlear Bone Anchored SolutionsCompletedSingle Sided Sensorineural Deafness | Mixed Hearing Loss, UnilateralDenmark, Spain, United Kingdom, Belgium
-
University of Colorado, DenverCompletedSudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SSNHL)United States
Clinical Trials on Auditory intervention filter-modulated group
-
Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyRecruiting
-
University of RzeszowCompletedNerve Disorders
-
University of the Sciences in PhiladelphiaCompleted
-
Foundation University IslamabadRecruitingBinaural Auditory Beats ,Hand-eye CoordinationPakistan
-
IRCCS Eugenio MedeaEnrolling by invitationLanguage Development Disorders | Infant Development | Language Development | InterventionItaly
-
University of MichiganNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)Completed
-
Northwestern UniversityCompletedMild Cognitive ImpairmentUnited States
-
Henry Ford Health SystemWayne State UniversityRecruiting
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruiting