Hericium Erinaceus Mycelium and Probiotic of the Grape King Bio on Symptoms of Premenstrual Syndrome

June 30, 2022 updated by: Chung Shan Medical University

To Evaluate the Improvement Effect of Supplementing Hericium Erinaceus Mycelium Capsules and Grape King Probiotic Capsules of the Grape King Bio on Physiological and Psychological Symptoms of Premenstrual Syndrome

The purpose of this experiment is to evaluate the efficacy of supplemental health food Grape King Hericium erinaceus Mycelium Capsules and Grape King Probiotic Capsules in improving physical and psychological symptoms, blood oxidative stress and inflammation indicators in women with premenstrual syndrome.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study was a randomized, double-blinded and placebo-controlled research. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Chung Shan Medical University Hospital and all Participants signed the written informed consent to participate in the study.

Participants met the inclusion criteria, ie: age 20~45 yr and a regular menstrual cycle (21~35 days per cycle) were recruited through advertisements posted around the Chun Shan Medical university campus. In screening phase of this study, affective and one somatic symptom in before onset of menstruation in two consecutive cycles and was not affected by depression or anxiety disorder, she is examined by the Attending Physician of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department to diagnosed a patient with premenstrual syndrome. In the intervention phase of this study, 105 eligible participant were randomly divided into intervention (Grape King Hericium erinaceus Mycelium Capsules and Grape King Probiotic Capsules) and control groups (n=35/group). Both subjects and researchers were blind to the treatment assignment until the statistical analysis was completed. All participants received two oral capsules containing Hericium erinaceus Mycelium, probiotics or placebo every day for the 3 months. The capsules of intervention supplementations and placebo provided by Grape King Biotechnology Inc in identical appearance and package to guarantee the blindness.

Data collection A validated semi-quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire was used to obtain daily nutritional values of participants. To assess the symptoms of PMS, all subjects need to fill out daily record of severity of problems on a daily basis in the 3 months of intervention period and 6 months after the intervention. In the 0, 1, 3 months of intervention, the anthropometric parameters and body composition were measured by using bioelectrical impedance analysis method ( MC-980 MA PLUS, TANITA BIA Technology). In the 0, 1, 3 months of intervention, venous blood samples were taken from all subjects for measuring the marks of oxidative stress and inflammation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

105

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taichung, Taiwan
        • Kai-Li Liu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Women aged 20-45
  2. The menstrual cycle is 21~35 days/time
  3. PMS diagnosed by an obstetrician
  4. Willing to sign the subject's consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Those are with cancer, cardiovascular, kidney, liver, infectious and endocrine diseases, aw well as with depression and anxiety tendencies
  2. Those have a surgery in the last 6 months
  3. Those use of probiotics, estrogen and birth control pills
  4. Body mass index > 39 kg/m2, smoking, drinking
  5. Death of a close relative and other stressful events within the last 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hericium Erinaceus Mycelium
patients with premenstrual syndrome received supplementation of Hericium Erinaceus Mycelium capsules
participants received two oral capsules containing Hericium erinaceus Mycelium every day for the 3 months.
Experimental: Probiotic
patients with premenstrual syndrome received supplementation of Probiotic capsules
participants received two oral capsules containing Probiotic powder every day for the 3 months.
Placebo Comparator: control
patients with premenstrual syndrome received supplementation of placebo capsules
participants received two oral capsules containing control powder every day for the 3 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The differences from control of Daily record of severity of problems
Time Frame: All eligible subjects recorded their symptoms by questionnaire of daily record of severity of problems at every day of 3 consecutive menstrual cycles during the intervention period and the 3rd menstrual cycles at the end of intervention.
This questionnaire of daily record of severity of problems were using to determine the severity of PMS including mood, physical and behavioral symptoms and characteristics. There are21 items grouped into 11 domains. Additional questions asked about quality of life and satisfaction of self-health. The levels of severity on this form are: 1- Not at all, 2- Minimal to Mild, 3-Moderate, 4- Severe. During each month of the intervention period and the 3rd menstrual cycles at the end of intervention, the differences of the total scores of menstrual cycles compared with the control group in each intervention groups were analyzed.
All eligible subjects recorded their symptoms by questionnaire of daily record of severity of problems at every day of 3 consecutive menstrual cycles during the intervention period and the 3rd menstrual cycles at the end of intervention.
The changes from baseline of Daily record of severity of problems
Time Frame: All eligible subjects recorded their symptoms by questionnaire of daily record of severity of problems at every day of 3 consecutive menstrual cycles during the intervention period and the 3rd menstrual cycles at the end of intervention.
This questionnaire of daily record of severity of problems were using to determine the severity of PMS including mood, physical and behavioral symptoms and characteristics. There are21 items grouped into 11 domains. Additional questions asked about quality of life and satisfaction of self-health. The levels of severity on this form are: 1- Not at all, 2- Minimal to Mild, 3-Moderate, 4- Severe. During each month of the intervention period and the 3rd menstrual cycles at the end of intervention, the changes of the total scores of menstrual cycles compared with the baseline in each groups were analyzed.
All eligible subjects recorded their symptoms by questionnaire of daily record of severity of problems at every day of 3 consecutive menstrual cycles during the intervention period and the 3rd menstrual cycles at the end of intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The differences from control of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein
Time Frame: In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.
The inflammation marker, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (mg/L), in the blood of the subjects were measured. The different concentration of the high-sensitivity C-reactive protein at each time points of intervention groups compared with control group were analyzed.
In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.
The differences from baseline of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein
Time Frame: In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.
The inflammation marker, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (mg/L), in the blood of the subjects were measured. The different concentration of the high-sensitivity C-reactive proteinat at the 1st and 3rd month compared with baseline in each group were analyzed.
In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.
The differences from control of high-sensitivity interleukin-6
Time Frame: In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of interleukin-6.
The inflammation marker, interleukin-6 (pg/mL), in the blood of the subjects were measured. The different concentration of the interleukin-6 at each time points of intervention groups compared with control group were analyzed.
In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of interleukin-6.
The differences from baseline of high-sensitivity interleukin-6
Time Frame: In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of interleukin-6.
The inflammation marker, interleukin-6 (pg/mL), in the blood of the subjects were measured. The different concentration of the interleukin-6 at the 1st and 3rd month compared with baseline in each group were analyzed.
In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of interleukin-6.
The differences from control of high-sensitivity interleukin-1
Time Frame: In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of interleukin-1.
The inflammation marker, interleukin-1 (pg/mL), in the blood of the subjects were measured. The different concentration of the interleukin-1 at each time points of intervention groups compared with control group were analyzed.
In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of interleukin-1.
The differences from baseline of high-sensitivity interleukin-1
Time Frame: In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of interleukin-1.
The inflammation marker, interleukin-1 (pg/mL), in the blood of the subjects were measured. The different concentration of the interleukin-1 at the 1st and 3rd month compared with baseline in each group were analyzed.
In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of interleukin-1.
The differences from control of high-sensitivity TNF-a
Time Frame: In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of TNF-a.
The inflammation marker, TNF-a (pg/mL), in the blood of the subjects were measured. The different concentration of the TNF-a at each time points of intervention groups compared with control group were analyzed.
In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of TNF-a.
The differences from baseline of high-sensitivity TNF-a
Time Frame: In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of TNF-a.
The inflammation marker, TNF-a (pg/mL), in the blood of the subjects were measured. The different concentration of the TNF-a at the 1st and 3rd month compared with baseline in each group were analyzed.
In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of TNF-a.
The differences from control of total antioxidant capacity
Time Frame: In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of total antioxidant capacity.
The oxidative stress index, total antioxidant capacity (μmol/L), in the blood of the subjects were measured. The different concentration of the total antioxidant capacity at each time points of intervention groups compared with control group were analyzed.
In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of total antioxidant capacity.
The differences from baseline of total antioxidant capacity
Time Frame: In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of total antioxidant capacity.
The oxidative stress index, total antioxidant capacity (μmol/L), in the blood of the subjects were measured. The different concentration of the total antioxidant capacity at the 1st and 3rd month compared with baseline in each group were analyzed.
In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of total antioxidant capacity.
The differences from control of malondialdehyde
Time Frame: In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of malondialdehyde.
The oxidative stress index, malondialdehyde (nmol/mL), in the blood of the subjects were measured. The different concentration of the total antioxidant capacity at each time points of intervention groups compared with control group were analyzed.
In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of malondialdehyde.
The differences from baseline of malondialdehyde
Time Frame: In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of malondialdehyde.
The oxidative stress index, malondialdehyde (nmol/mL), in the blood of the subjects were measured. The different concentration of the total antioxidant capacity at the 1st and 3rd month compared with baseline in each group were analyzed.
In the 1st data of menstruation of the beginning, 1st and 3rd months of intervention, the blood of all eligible subjects were collected to measure the concentration of malondialdehyde.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Kai-Li Liu, PhD, Department of Nutrition, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
  • Principal Investigator: Man-Jung Hung, MD, PhD, Department of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
  • Principal Investigator: Yi-Chin Lin, PhD, Department of Nutrition, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
  • Principal Investigator: Pey-Ling Shieh Shieh, PhD, Department of Psychology, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 8, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 7, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 7, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CS2-20104
  • BR-CT004 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Grape King Bio)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Premenstrual Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Hericium Erinaceus Mycelium

Subscribe