PERT to Improve Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (PERQ-UP)

December 19, 2024 updated by: Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy to Improve Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

After pancreas surgery, patients may develop pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI). PEI can be treated with oral pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT). However, the diagnosis of PEI is difficult and the guidelines about when to start PERT after pancreas surgery are conflicting. This pilot study aims to determine the feasibility of implementing a large-scale clinical trial to definitively evaluate if starting PERT immediately after surgery can improve outcomes in patients undergoing pancreas surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

After pancreas surgery, patients may develop pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI). This occurs when there are not enough exocrine cells in the pancreas to release enzymes that help with food digestion. Potential symptoms may include bloating, cramping, large and foul-smelling bowel movements (steatorrhea), and other gastrointestinal symptoms like diarrhea, weight-loss, and malnutrition. PEI can be treated with oral pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT), for example CREON. Many studies have shown that treatment of PEI with PERT is safe, effective, and may improve quality of life, reduce weight loss, improve abdominal symptoms, and may improve overall survival. However, the diagnosis of PEI is difficult and the guidelines about when to start PERT after pancreas surgery are conflicting. This pilot study aims to determine the feasibility of implementing a large-scale clinical trial to definitively evaluate if starting PERT immediately after surgery can improve outcomes in patients undergoing pancreas surgery.

Participants will be recruited from Ontario hospitals using a two-step eligibility process (pre- and post-operatively) and randomized 1:1 to receive either standard of care or PERT plus standard of care. Outcome measures will be collected 1 and 3 months postoperatively.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

166

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
        • Hamilton Health Sciences Centre
      • Kingston, Ontario, Canada
        • Kingston General Hospital
      • London, Ontario, Canada
        • London Health Sciences Centre
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
        • The Ottawa Hospital
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • University Health Network

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults aged >18 years
  2. Willing and able to provide informed consent and/or have a substitute decision maker (SDM) provide informed consent on behalf of the participant
  3. Planned PD for any indication AND, at randomization
  4. PD performed
  5. Discharge planned within 21 days of surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contraindication to PERT including:

    1. Hypersensitivity to porcine protein, pancreatic enzymes or any excipients
    2. History of fibrosing colonopathy
    3. Unable to tolerate oral medication
  2. Current use of PERT OR, at randomization
  3. Use of PERT at the time of randomization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PERT plus Standard of Care
Initiation of PERT at time of discharge post pancreaticoduodenectomy with dose escalation upon symptom presentation
Starting dose 50,000 units lipase per meal with 3 meals planned per day and 25,000 units of lipase per snack with 2 snacks planned per day. Dose escalation 100,000 units lipase with meals and 50,000 units with snacks.
Other Names:
  • PrCREON MINIMICROSPHERES®25 or similar (PrCotazym® ECS, PrPANCREASE® MT, PrVIOKACE™)
Initiation of PERT if clinical symptoms of PEI develop or worsen. Starting dose 50,000 units lipase per meal with 3 meals planned per day and 25,000 units of lipase per snack with 2 snacks planned per day.
Other: Standard of Care
Standard of care (no PERT) until presentation of PEI symptoms.
Initiation of PERT if clinical symptoms of PEI develop or worsen. Starting dose 50,000 units lipase per meal with 3 meals planned per day and 25,000 units of lipase per snack with 2 snacks planned per day.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients screened who consent
Time Frame: Baseline
Each centre will keep a screening log of all patients who are scheduled to undergo an elective pancreaticoduodenectomy and perform pre-screening to determine eligibility. The number of eligible patients who are approached for and consent to participate, as well as the number of approached eligible patients who decline to participate (and reasons for declining) will be recorded and the proportions will be calculated
Baseline
Proportion of patients screened who meet eligibility criteria
Time Frame: Baseline
Each centre will keep a screening log of all patients who are scheduled to undergo an elective pancreaticoduodenectomy and perform pre-screening to determine eligibility. The eligibility criteria that are unmet will be recorded, including the additional criteria for randomization. This will be used to calculate proportions.
Baseline
Adherence to PERT
Time Frame: 3 months
Recorded on participant's medication tracker and calculated as a percentage of expected vs. actual doses taken.
3 months
Adherence to PERT dosing guidelines
Time Frame: Day 0 (Discharge)
Review of medical record for appropriate use of PERT dosing guidelines, comparing actual prescription to dosing guideline
Day 0 (Discharge)
Adherence to PERT dosing guidelines
Time Frame: 1 month
Review of medical record for appropriate use of PERT dosing guidelines, comparing actual prescription to dosing guideline
1 month
Adherence to PERT dosing guidelines
Time Frame: 3 months
Review of medical record for appropriate use of PERT dosing guidelines, comparing actual prescription to dosing guideline
3 months
Completeness of dataset
Time Frame: 3 months
Assessment of completeness of data, loss to follow-up and missing data and reasons for not being able to collect data
3 months
Resource requirement for definitive trial
Time Frame: Study completion (1.5 years)
Each site will complete a survey at the end of the trial to report the amount of time spent on study activities
Study completion (1.5 years)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weight loss
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 months
Difference in weight (kg) from baseline
1 month, 3 months
Change in Digestive Symptoms Scale from Baseline
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 months
Measured using PAN26 quality of life questionnaire which specific to pancreatic cancer and must be administered in conjunction with QLQ-C30. Scores range from 0 to 100 and consist of functional scales and symptoms scales. A high score on the symptoms scales indicates a high level of symptomatology. A high score on the functional scales indicates a high level of functioning.
1 month, 3 months
Change in Quality of Life from Baseline
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 months
Measured using the QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaires. QLQ-C30 is a validated questionnaire that assesses health-related quality of life (QoL) in cancer patients. Scores for both questionnaires range from 0 to 100 and consist of functional scales and symptoms scales. A high score on the symptoms scales indicates a high level of symptomatology. A high score on the functional scales indicates a high level of functioning.
1 month, 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paul Karanicolas, MD, PhD, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 6, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 3962 (Direktion Lehre und Forschung Insel Spital Bern)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Insufficiency

Clinical Trials on PERT at discharge

Subscribe