Predicting Neuromuscular Recovery in Surgical Patients Using Machine Learning (PINES)

May 2, 2026 updated by: Flora Scheffenbichler, University Hospital Ulm

Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm for Prediction of Complete Neuromuscular Recovery in Adult Surgical Patients

Despite emerging efforts to decrease residual paralysis and postoperative complications with the use of quantitative neuromuscular monitoring and reversal agents their incidences remain high. In an optimal setting, neuromuscular blocking agents are dosed in a way that there is no residual block at the end of surgery. The effect of neuromuscular blocking agents, however, is highly variable and is not only influenced by their dose, but also by several patient-related factors such as muscle status, metabolic activity, and anesthesia management. Accordingly, the duration of action is difficult to predict.

The PINES project will use artificial intelligence methods to develop a model that can accurately predict the course of action of neuromuscular blocking agents. It will be used to predict time to complete neuromuscular recovery (train-of-four [TOF] ratio >0.9) and may provide as a decision support in the individual management of timing and dosing of neuromuscular blocking drugs and their reversal agents.

In a secondary analysis, the association between the choice of neuromuscular blocking agent and postoperative pulmonary complications will be evaluated.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The objective of the PINES project is to identify a model that can accurately predict 1) time to complete neuromuscular recovery, 2) optimal timing and dose of neuromuscular blocking agents at each time point during surgery, and 3) TOF ratio at the estimated end of surgery to assess residual paralysis. Furthermore, a prospective clinical pilot study will be conducted to compare anesthesiologist-predicted neuromuscular recovery with that of the algorithm.

The project consists of two main objectives:

I. Big data analysis

  • Establishing a data warehouse: Electronic registry data will be used.
  • Generation of prediction models: Classification models will first be used to identify and weight the relevant parameters collected during premedication and intraoperatively. These will form the basis for the training cohort, which can then be used to carry out a simulated real-time analysis of the data. To compare the models, the loss functions mean squared error, mean absolute error and Huber Loss will be calculated.

II. Prospective comparison of the prediction: machine-learning model vs. anesthesiologist

Using the validated final prediction model with the best accuracy, the investigators will perform a prospective clinical pilot study. The cohort will include prospectively enrolled adult surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia with a single dose of rocuronium for neuromuscular blockade. For each enrolled case, both the PINES algorithm and an experienced anesthesiologist will estimate the time to neuromuscular recovery, defined as a train-of-four (TOF) ratio > 0.9.

At anesthesia induction, following administration of the neuromuscular blocking agent, participating specialist-level anesthesiologists will prospectively estimate the time in minutes until recovery of neuromuscular transmission. The PINES machine-learning model will generate its prediction. The actual recovery time will be determined from the continuously recorded intraoperative TOF measurements.

The agreement between the predicted and observed recovery times will be assessed by calculating the difference between predicted and actual values, as well as by determining inter-rater correlation coefficients comparing anesthesiologist predictions, algorithm predictions, and the measured recovery times.

In a secondary analysis, there will be evaluated whether the choice of neuromuscular blocking agent influences postoperative pulmonary complication risk in adult patients. Confounding will be addressed using statistical methods based on a causal inference framework.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

240000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Baden-Wurttemberg
      • Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany, 89073
        • University Hospital Ulm
    • Bavaria
      • Munich, Bavaria, Germany, 81675
        • Technical University Munich

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients (≥18 years) receiving non-cardiac surgery receiving neuromuscular blocking agents and with available TOF data.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing non-cardiac surgery receiving general anesthesia with intraoperative neuromuscular blocking agent administration and available TOF data.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Single neuromuscular blocking agent dose
Patients receiving a single dose of neuromuscular blocking agent
Incremental doses of neuromuscular blocking agents
Patients receiving repetitive doses of neuromuscular blocking agents
Pharmacological reversal
Patients receiving pharmacological reversal of neuromuscular block

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
complete neuromuscular recovery
Time Frame: intraoperative
predicting the time to complete neuromuscular recovery (defined as TOF ratio >0.9) from any time point of surgery
intraoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Manfred Blobner, MD PhD, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Ulm,Ulm, Germany

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2026

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Complications

Subscribe