- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05482724
Super Skills for Life Effectiveness in Clinical Settings
Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Spanish Children: Efficacy of Super Skills for Life Transdiagnostic Treatment
Super Skills for Life (SSL) is a transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral protocol developed for children aged 6 to 12 with anxiety and comorbid problems (e.g., depression, low self-esteem, and lack of social skills).
SSL consists of eight sessions targeting common risk factors for internalizing disorders such as cognitive distortions, avoidance, emotional management, low self-esteem, social skills deficits and coping strategies.
The aim of the study is to investigate the short- and long-term effects of SSL on internalizing and externalizing symptoms in Spanish children attending the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
To validate eligibility children and their parents will complete several psychometrically robust and developmentally appropriate measures. Participants meeting inclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to the conditions of the intervention group and the wait-list control group.
Parents and children from both groups will complete the same measures at baseline and post-treatment.
Parents and children from SSL will also complete these measures at 3 months follow-up, 6 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up.
The investigators will assess the benefits from pre-test to post-test in children participating in SSL compared to those in a wait-list control group on DSM-5 diagnostic remission, anxiety symptoms, anxiety impairment, depressive symptoms, self-esteem, behavioral problems, hyperactivity/inattention, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behavior.
The investigators will also assess these variables in the intervention group at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up.
Ultimately, the goal of the study is to explore whether SSL can be a cost-effective psychological intervention for emotional disorders in the Spanish National Health System.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Valencia
-
Valence, Valencia, Spain, 46010
- Hospital Clínico Universitario Valencia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children aged 8 - 12.
- Primary diagnosis of an anxiety disorder, a depressive disorder, and/or trauma- or stress-related disorder with anxiety and/or depressive symptoms.
- Speaking, reading, writing and understanding Spanish.
- Caregivers agree to attend all sessions and to receive feedback and suggestions.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Intellectual disability, behavioral symptoms, or autism spectrum symptoms whose severity precluded continued treatment.
- The child is at the same time in psychological treatment.
- The child is not on a stable dose of medication for at least 1 month prior to baseline assessment.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention group
Super Skills for Life intervention group
|
Structured and manualized intervention with a manual for the therapist and a workbook for the children. Spanish version of Super Skills for Life group program: Orgilés, M., Espada, J.P., Ollendick, T.H. & Essau, C. (2022). Programa Super Skills. Manual del aplicador. Elche, ES: Universidad Miguel Hernández. The intervention was administered by a trained clinical psychologist in SSL. Sessions were held after school hours once a week for eight weeks, with each session lasting approximately one hour. The contents of the program were covered through playful activities in groups of 4 to 6 children |
|
No Intervention: Wait-list group
Group without any intervention.
Participants in the wait-list group received no phycological (public or private) intervention during the eight-week duration of the SSL program.
They were informed that children in this group will receive the intervention once the follow-up visit is completed.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Children's reported anxiety symptoms at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention
|
Measured by Spence Children's Anxiety Scale Child Report (SCAS).
SCAS measures symptoms severity of the DSM-IV anxiety disorders in children (subscales: total, panic and agoraphobia, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, social phobia, separation anxiety and specific fears).
Symptom frequency is recorded on a 3-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 3 (always).
This yields a minimum possible score of 0 and a maximum possible score of 114.
Higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms.
|
3 months after the intervention
|
|
Children's reported anxiety symptoms at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months after the intervention
|
Measured by Spence Children's Anxiety Scale Child Report (SCAS).
SCAS measures symptoms severity of the DSM-IV anxiety disorders in children (subscales: total, panic and agoraphobia, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, social phobia, separation anxiety and specific fears).
Symptom frequency is recorded on a 3-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 3 (always).
This yields a minimum possible score of 0 and a maximum possible score of 114.
Higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms.
|
6 months after the intervention
|
|
Parent-reported anxiety-related interference at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention
|
Measured by Child Anxiety Life Interference Scale Parent Report (CALIS-P).
It assesses life interference and impairment related to anxiety in the child's school, social, and home/family settings.
Scores range from a minimum value of 0 to a maximun value of 64.
Higher scores indicate larger child anxiety-related interference.
|
3 months after the intervention
|
|
Parent-reported anxiety-related interference at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months after the intervention
|
Measured by Child Anxiety Life Interference Scale Parent Report (CALIS-P).
It assesses life interference and impairment related to anxiety in the child's school, social, and home/family settings.
Scores range from a minimum value of 0 to a maximun value of 64.
Higher scores indicate larger child anxiety-related interference.
|
6 months after the intervention
|
|
Change from baseline diagnosis based on DSM-5 criteria to immediately after the intervention
Time Frame: baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
Measured by Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for schoolage youths-present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL).
The K-SADS-PL is a semi-structured interview for children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years according to DSM-IV criteria.
Additional questions were included in this study to obtain a diagnosis according to the current DSM-5 classification.
|
baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
|
Diagnosis based on DSM-5 criteria at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention
|
Measured by Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for schoolage youths-present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL).
The K-SADS-PL is a semi-structured interview for children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years according to DSM-IV criteria.
Additional questions were included in this study to obtain a diagnosis according to the current DSM-5 classification.
|
3 months after the intervention
|
|
Diagnosis based on DSM-5 criteria at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months after the intervention
|
Measured by Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for schoolage youths-present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL).
The K-SADS-PL is a semi-structured interview for children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years according to DSM-IV criteria.
Additional questions were included in this study to obtain a diagnosis according to the current DSM-5 classification.
|
6 months after the intervention
|
|
Diagnosis based on DSM-5 criteria at 1 year
Time Frame: 1 year after the intervention
|
Measured by Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for schoolage youths-present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL).
The K-SADS-PL is a semi-structured interview for children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years according to DSM-IV criteria.
Additional questions were included in this study to obtain a diagnosis according to the current DSM-5 classification.
|
1 year after the intervention
|
|
Change from baseline depression symptoms to immediately after the intervention
Time Frame: baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
Measured by Child Depression Inventory (CDI).
It assess depressive symptoms experienced in the past two weeks.
The CDI provides an overall score (minimum value 0, maximum value 54) and two dimensions values: dysphoria (minimum value 0, maximum value 34), and negative self-esteem (minimum value 0, maximum value 20).
Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
|
baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
|
Depression symptoms at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention
|
Measured by Child Depression Inventory (CDI).
It assess depressive symptoms experienced in the past two weeks.
The CDI provides an overall score (minimum value 0, maximum value 54) and two dimensions values: dysphoria (minimum value 0, maximum value 34), and negative self-esteem (minimum value 0, maximum value 20).
Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
|
3 months after the intervention
|
|
Depression symptoms at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months after the intervention
|
Measured by Child Depression Inventory (CDI).
It assess depressive symptoms experienced in the past two weeks.
The CDI provides an overall score (minimum value 0, maximum value 54) and two dimensions values: dysphoria (minimum value 0, maximum value 34), and negative self-esteem (minimum value 0, maximum value 20).
Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
|
6 months after the intervention
|
|
Depression symptoms at 1 year
Time Frame: 1 year after the intervention
|
Measured by Child Depression Inventory (CDI).
It assess depressive symptoms experienced in the past two weeks.
The CDI provides an overall score (minimum value 0, maximum value 54) and two dimensions values: dysphoria (minimum value 0, maximum value 34), and negative self-esteem (minimum value 0, maximum value 20).
Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
|
1 year after the intervention
|
|
Change from baseline parent-reported anxiety symptoms to immediately after the intervention
Time Frame: baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
Measured by Spence Children's Anxiety Scale Parent Report (SCAS-P).
SCAS-P measures symptoms severity of the DSM-IV anxiety disorders in children (subscales: total, panic and agoraphobia, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, social phobia, separation anxiety and specific fears).
Symptom frequency is recorded on a 3-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 3 (always).
This yields a minimum possible score of 0 and a maximum possible score of 114.
Higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms.
|
baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
|
Change from baseline children's reported anxiety symptoms to immediately after the intervention
Time Frame: baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
Measured by Spence Children's Anxiety Scale Child Report (SCAS).
SCAS measures symptoms severity of the DSM-IV anxiety disorders in children (subscales: total, panic and agoraphobia, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, social phobia, separation anxiety and specific fears).
Symptom frequency is recorded on a 3-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 3 (always).
This yields a minimum possible score of 0 and a maximum possible score of 114.
Higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms.
|
baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
|
Parent-reported anxiety symptoms at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention
|
Measured by Spence Children's Anxiety Scale Parent Report (SCAS-P).
SCAS-P measures symptoms severity of the DSM-IV anxiety disorders in children (subscales: total, panic and agoraphobia, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, social phobia, separation anxiety and specific fears).
Symptom frequency is recorded on a 3-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 3 (always).
This yields a minimum possible score of 0 and a maximum possible score of 114.
Higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms.
|
3 months after the intervention
|
|
Parent-reported anxiety symptoms at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months after the intervention
|
Measured by Spence Children's Anxiety Scale Parent Report (SCAS-P).
SCAS-P measures symptoms severity of the DSM-IV anxiety disorders in children (subscales: total, panic and agoraphobia, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, social phobia, separation anxiety and specific fears).
Symptom frequency is recorded on a 3-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 3 (always).
This yields a minimum possible score of 0 and a maximum possible score of 114.
Higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms.
|
6 months after the intervention
|
|
Parent-reported anxiety symptoms at 1 year
Time Frame: 1 year after the intervention
|
Measured by Spence Children's Anxiety Scale Parent Report (SCAS-P).
SCAS-P measures symptoms severity of the DSM-IV anxiety disorders in children (subscales: total, panic and agoraphobia, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, social phobia, separation anxiety and specific fears).
Symptom frequency is recorded on a 3-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 3 (always).
This yields a minimum possible score of 0 and a maximum possible score of 114.
Higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms.
|
1 year after the intervention
|
|
Children's reported anxiety symptoms at 1 year
Time Frame: 1 year after the intervention
|
Measured by Spence Children's Anxiety Scale Child Report (SCAS).
SCAS measures symptoms severity of the DSM-IV anxiety disorders in children (subscales: total, panic and agoraphobia, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, social phobia, separation anxiety and specific fears).
Symptom frequency is recorded on a 3-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 3 (always).
This yields a minimum possible score of 0 and a maximum possible score of 114.
Higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms.
|
1 year after the intervention
|
|
Change from baseline parent-reported anxiety-related interference to immediately after the intervention
Time Frame: baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
Measured by Child Anxiety Life Interference Scale Parent Report (CALIS-P).
It assesses life interference and impairment related to anxiety in the child's school, social, and home/family settings.
Scores range from a minimum value of 0 to a maximun value of 64.
Higher scores indicate larger child anxiety-related interference.
|
baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
|
Change from baseline children's reported anxiety-related interference to immediately after the intervention
Time Frame: baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
Measured by Child Anxiety Life Interference Scale Child Report (CALIS-C).
It assesses life interference and impairment related to anxiety in the child's school, social, and home/family settings.
Scores range from a minimum value of 0 to a maximun value of 36.
Higher scores indicate larger child anxiety-related interference.
|
baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
|
Children's reported anxiety-related interference at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention
|
Measured by Child Anxiety Life Interference Scale Child Report (CALIS-C).
It assesses life interference and impairment related to anxiety in the child's school, social, and home/family settings.
Scores range from a minimum value of 0 to a maximun value of 36.
Higher scores indicate larger child anxiety-related interference.
|
3 months after the intervention
|
|
Children's reported anxiety-related interference at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months after the intervention
|
Measured by Child Anxiety Life Interference Scale Child Report (CALIS-C).
It assesses life interference and impairment related to anxiety in the child's school, social, and home/family settings.
Scores range from a minimum value of 0 to a maximun value of 36.
Higher scores indicate larger child anxiety-related interference.
|
6 months after the intervention
|
|
Parent-reported anxiety-related interference at 1 year
Time Frame: 1 year after the intervention
|
Measured by Child Anxiety Life Interference Scale Parent Report (CALIS-P).
It assesses life interference and impairment related to anxiety in the child's school, social, and home/family settings.
Scores range from a minimum value of 0 to a maximun value of 64.
Higher scores indicate larger child anxiety-related interference.
|
1 year after the intervention
|
|
Children's reported anxiety-related interference at 1 year
Time Frame: 1 year after the intervention
|
Measured by Child Anxiety Life Interference Scale Child Report (CALIS-C).
It assesses life interference and impairment related to anxiety in the child's school, social, and home/family settings.
Scores range from a minimum value of 0 to a maximun value of 36.
Higher scores indicate larger child anxiety-related interference.
|
1 year after the intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-esteem at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention
|
Self-Concept Form 5 (AF-5).
It measures global satisfaction with self-concept (minimum value 0 and maximum value 120) and five dimensions (minimum value 0 and maximum value 24): Social (performance in social relationships); Academic/Professional (student/worker role); Emotional (perception of emotional state in general and in specific situations); Family (participation and integration into the family unit); and Physical self-concept (appearance and physical condition).
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with self-image.
|
3 months after the intervention
|
|
Self-esteem at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months after the intervention
|
Self-Concept Form 5 (AF-5).
It measures global satisfaction with self-concept (minimum value 0 and maximum value 120) and five dimensions (minimum value 0 and maximum value 24): Social (performance in social relationships); Academic/Professional (student/worker role); Emotional (perception of emotional state in general and in specific situations); Family (participation and integration into the family unit); and Physical self-concept (appearance and physical condition).
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with self-image.
|
6 months after the intervention
|
|
Change from baseline children's reported global mental health symptoms to immediately after the intervention
Time Frame: baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
Measured by Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Child Report (SDQ).
It was designed to measure children's overall difficulties (minimum value 0 and maximum value 40) and positive attributes across five subscales (minimum value 0 and maximun value 10): Emotional symptoms (e.g., anxiety and depression), Conduct problems, Hyperactivity/Inattention, Peer relationships (difficulties), and Pro-social behavior. .
Higher scores indicate higher levels of difficulties, except on the prosocial subscale, where higher scores reflect a more positive attribute.
|
baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
|
Change from baseline parent's reported global mental health symptoms to immediately after the intervention
Time Frame: baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
Measured by Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Parent Report (SDQ-P).
It was designed to measure children's overall difficulties (minimum value 0 and maximum value 40) and positive attributes across five subscales (minimum value 0 and maximum value 10): Emotional symptoms (e.g., anxiety and depression), Conduct problems, Hyperactivity/Inattention, Peer relationships (difficulties), and Pro-social behavior. .
Higher scores indicate higher levels of difficulties, except on the prosocial subscale, where higher scores reflect a more positive attribute.
|
baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
|
Children's reported global mental health symptoms at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention
|
Measured by Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Child Report (SDQ).
It was designed to measure children's overall difficulties (minimum value 0 and maximum value 40) and positive attributes across five subscales (minimum value 0 and maximun value 10): Emotional symptoms (e.g., anxiety and depression), Conduct problems, Hyperactivity/Inattention, Peer relationships (difficulties), and Pro-social behavior. .
Higher scores indicate higher levels of difficulties, except on the prosocial subscale, where higher scores reflect a more positive attribute.
|
3 months after the intervention
|
|
Parent's reported global mental health symptoms at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention
|
Measured by Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Parent Report (SDQ-P).
It was designed to measure children's overall difficulties (minimum value 0 and maximum value 40) and positive attributes across five subscales (minimum value 0 and maximum value 10): Emotional symptoms (e.g., anxiety and depression), Conduct problems, Hyperactivity/Inattention, Peer relationships (difficulties), and Pro-social behavior. .
Higher scores indicate higher levels of difficulties, except on the prosocial subscale, where higher scores reflect a more positive attribute.
|
3 months after the intervention
|
|
Children's reported global mental health symptoms at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months after the intervention
|
Measured by Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Child Report (SDQ).
It was designed to measure children's overall difficulties (minimum value 0 and maximum value 40) and positive attributes across five subscales (minimum value 0 and maximun value 10): Emotional symptoms (e.g., anxiety and depression), Conduct problems, Hyperactivity/Inattention, Peer relationships (difficulties), and Pro-social behavior. .
Higher scores indicate higher levels of difficulties, except on the prosocial subscale, where higher scores reflect a more positive attribute.
|
6 months after the intervention
|
|
Parent's reported global mental health symptoms at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months after the intervention
|
Measured by Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Parent Report (SDQ-P).
It was designed to measure children's overall difficulties (minimum value 0 and maximum value 40) and positive attributes across five subscales (minimum value 0 and maximum value 10): Emotional symptoms (e.g., anxiety and depression), Conduct problems, Hyperactivity/Inattention, Peer relationships (difficulties), and Pro-social behavior. .
Higher scores indicate higher levels of difficulties, except on the prosocial subscale, where higher scores reflect a more positive attribute.
|
6 months after the intervention
|
|
Children's reported global mental health symptoms at 1 year
Time Frame: 1 year after the intervention
|
Measured by Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Child Report (SDQ).
It was designed to measure children's overall difficulties (minimum value 0 and maximum value 40) and positive attributes across five subscales (minimum value 0 and maximun value 10): Emotional symptoms (e.g., anxiety and depression), Conduct problems, Hyperactivity/Inattention, Peer relationships (difficulties), and Pro-social behavior. .
Higher scores indicate higher levels of difficulties, except on the prosocial subscale, where higher scores reflect a more positive attribute.
|
1 year after the intervention
|
|
Parent's reported global mental health symptoms at 1 year
Time Frame: 1 year after the intervention
|
Measured by Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Parent Report (SDQ-P).
It was designed to measure children's overall difficulties (minimum value 0 and maximum value 40) and positive attributes across five subscales (minimum value 0 and maximum value 10): Emotional symptoms (e.g., anxiety and depression), Conduct problems, Hyperactivity/Inattention, Peer relationships (difficulties), and Pro-social behavior. .
Higher scores indicate higher levels of difficulties, except on the prosocial subscale, where higher scores reflect a more positive attribute.
|
1 year after the intervention
|
|
Change from baseline self-esteem to immediately after the intervention
Time Frame: baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
Self-Concept Form 5 (AF-5).
It measures global satisfaction with self-concept (minimum value 0 and maximum value 120) and five dimensions (minimum value 0 and maximum value 24): Social (performance in social relationships); Academic/Professional (student/worker role); Emotional (perception of emotional state in general and in specific situations); Family (participation and integration into the family unit); and Physical self-concept (appearance and physical condition).
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with self-image.
|
baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
|
Self-esteem at 1 year
Time Frame: 1 year after the intervention
|
Self-Concept Form 5 (AF-5).
It measures global satisfaction with self-concept (minimum value 0 and maximum value 120) and five dimensions (minimum value 0 and maximum value 24): Social (performance in social relationships); Academic/Professional (student/worker role); Emotional (perception of emotional state in general and in specific situations); Family (participation and integration into the family unit); and Physical self-concept (appearance and physical condition).
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with self-image.
|
1 year after the intervention
|
|
Perfectionism
Time Frame: pre-intervention
|
Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (FMPS).
A self-report measure with four sub-scales of perfectionism: concern over mistakes and doubts about actions, excessive concern with parents' expectations and evaluation, excessively high personal standards, concern with precision, order and organisation.
|
pre-intervention
|
|
Changes from baseline health-related quality of life to immediately after the intervention
Time Frame: baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents aged from 8 to 18 years (KIDSCREEN).
It assess children's and parents' subjective health and well-being in 10 areas.
|
baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
|
Health-related quality of life at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention
|
Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents aged from 8 to 18 years (KIDSCREEN).
It assess children's and parents' subjective health and well-being in 10 areas.
|
3 months after the intervention
|
|
Health-related quality of life at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months after the intervention
|
Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents aged from 8 to 18 years (KIDSCREEN).
It assess children's and parents' subjective health and well-being in 10 areas.
|
6 months after the intervention
|
|
Health-related quality of life at 1 year
Time Frame: 1 year after the intervention
|
Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents aged from 8 to 18 years (KIDSCREEN).
It assess children's and parents' subjective health and well-being in 10 areas.
|
1 year after the intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sara Diego, Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche
- Study Director: Mireia Orgiles, Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Essau CA, Olaya B, Sasagawa S, Pithia J, Bray D, Ollendick TH. Integrating video-feedback and cognitive preparation, social skills training and behavioural activation in a cognitive behavioural therapy in the treatment of childhood anxiety. J Affect Disord. 2014;167:261-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.05.056. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
- Essau CA, Sasagawa S, Jones G, Fernandes B, Ollendick TH. Evaluating the real-world effectiveness of a cognitive behavior therapy-based transdiagnostic program for emotional problems in children in a regular school setting. J Affect Disord. 2019 Jun 15;253:357-365. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.04.036. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
- Orgiles M, Fernandez-Martinez I, Espada JP, Morales A. Spanish version of Super Skills for Life: short- and long-term impact of a transdiagnostic prevention protocol targeting childhood anxiety and depression. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2019 Nov;32(6):694-710. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2019.1645836. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
- Fernandez-Martinez I, Orgiles M, Morales A, Espada JP, Essau CA. One-Year follow-up effects of a cognitive behavior therapy-based transdiagnostic program for emotional problems in young children: A school-based cluster-randomized controlled trial. J Affect Disord. 2020 Feb 1;262:258-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
- Melero S, Orgiles M, Espada JP, Morales A. Spanish version of Super Skills for Life in individual modality: Improvement of children's emotional well-being from a transdiagnostic approach. J Clin Psychol. 2021 Oct;77(10):2187-2202. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23148. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
- Fernandez-Martinez I, Morales A, Espada JP, Orgiles M. Effects of Super Skills for Life on the social skills of anxious children through video analysis. Psicothema. 2020 May;32(2):229-236. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2019.240.
- Melero S, Morales A, Espada JP, Orgiles M. Improving Social Performance Through Video-feedback with Cognitive Preparation in Children with Emotional Problems. Behav Modif. 2022 Jul;46(4):755-781. doi: 10.1177/0145445521991098. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
- Escribano S, Espada JP, Orgiles M, Morales A. Implementation fidelity for promoting the effectiveness of an adolescent sexual health program. Eval Program Plann. 2016 Dec;59:81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
- Orgiles M, Melero S, Fernandez-Martinez I, Espada JP, Morales A. Effectiveness of Video-Feedback with Cognitive Preparation in Improving Social Performance and Anxiety through Super Skills for Life Programme Implemented in a School Setting. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 18;17(8):2805. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082805.
- Melero S, Morales A, Espada JP, Mendez X, Orgiles M. Effectiveness of Group vs. Individual Therapy to Decrease Peer Problems and Increase Prosociality in Children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 9;18(8):3950. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083950.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2018/034
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- SAP
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Depressive Disorder
-
Aalborg University HospitalRecruitingDepressive Disorder | Depression | Depressive Episode | Depressive Disorders | Depressive Episodes | Depression - Major Depressive Disorder | Depressive Disorder, Major Depressive DisorderDenmark
-
Sheba Medical CenterNot yet recruiting
-
Rotman Research Institute at BaycrestRecruitingMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD)Canada
-
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.RecruitingACP-211 Monotherapy for Major Depressive Disorder With Inadequate Antidepressant Response (NORLIGHT)Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant | Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)United States
-
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteRecruitingDepression - Major Depressive Disorder | Depression Chronic | Treatment-Resistant Major Depressive Disorder | Depression DisorderSpain
-
The Royal Ottawa Mental Health CentreNot yet recruitingDepression | Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) | Depressive Episode | Depression - Major Depressive DisorderCanada
-
Stanford UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Recruiting
-
TakedaRecruitingMajor Depressive DisorderJapan
-
Neurocrine BiosciencesRecruitingMajor Depressive DisorderSpain, Serbia, United States, Bulgaria, Canada, Estonia, Italy, Poland, Taiwan, Australia, South Korea
-
Luye Pharma Group Ltd.Enrolling by invitationMajor Depressive DisorderChina
Clinical Trials on Super Skills for Life
-
Universidad Miguel Hernandez de ElcheActive, not recruitingDepressive Disorder | Mood Disorders | Anxiety Disorders | Emotional Disorder | Depressive Symptoms | Anxiety Disorders and SymptomsSpain
-
Universidad Miguel Hernandez de ElcheMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad, SpainCompletedDepressive Disorder | Mood Disorders | Anxiety Disorders | Emotional Disorder | Depressive Symptoms | Child Mental Disorder | Anxiety Disorders and SymptomsSpain
-
University of RoehamptonUniversity of Malaya; Universidad Complutense de Madrid; Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi and other collaboratorsRecruitingAnxiety | Depression in AdolescenceMalaysia
-
Fatima Jinnah Women UniversityCompletedSocial Skills | Behavioral Problems | Emotional Problems | Childhood Anxiety | Childhood Depression | Quality of Life (QOL) | Low Self-EsteemPakistan
-
NYU Langone HealthNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedSocial Anxiety DisorderUnited States
-
Universidad Miguel Hernandez de ElcheActive, not recruitingMood Disorders | Depressive Symptoms | Social Skills | Anxiety Symptoms | Perfectionism | Emotion Regulation | Self Esteem | Positive Affect | Emotional Intelligence | Negative AffectSpain
-
Carnegie Mellon UniversityUniversity of Pittsburgh; West Virginia UniversityCompletedPregnancy | Sexually Transmitted Infections | Automobile AccidentsUnited States
-
London School of Economics and Political ScienceBill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Aga Khan UniversityCompletedDepression | Domestic Violence | Intimate Partner Violence | Battered Women | Mental Health Issue | Gender-based Violence | Rape Sexual AssaultPakistan
-
Koç UniversityActive, not recruitingDepression | Anxiety | Psychological Distress | Secondary TraumaTurkey
-
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalMcMaster Children's Hospital; ErinoakKids Centre for Treatment and DevelopmentCompletedChild-onset DisabilityCanada