Effects of Video-recorded Role-play and Guided Reflection on Nursing Student Empathy, Caring Behavior, and Competence

July 28, 2022 updated by: Chin-Tsung Shen, Mackay Medical College

Effects of Video-recorded Role-play and Guided Reflection on Nursing Student Empathy, Caring Behavior, and Competence: A Two-group Pretest-posttest Study

Objectives: To examine the differences in nursing student empathy, caring behaviour, and competence between the experimental and control groups before and after educational intervention, and to predict the factors affecting their core competencies.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Design: The investigators used a two-group pretest and post-test quasi-experimental design.

Setting: The experiment was conducted at a college in northern Taiwan. Participants: First-year nursing students from medical schools in Taiwan participated in our study.

Methods: Data were collected between March and May 2022. The learning method used with the intervention group was role-playing with videos and guided reflection. The control group was exposed to classroom lectures without video-recorded role-play and guided reflection. Empathy, caring behaviour, and competence were measured using the Jefferson Scale of Empathy- Healthcare Providers, the Caring Behaviours Scale, and the Nursing Student Competence Scale.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • New Taipei City, Taiwan
        • Department of Nursing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • (1) Students who were first-year nursing students at college,
  • (2) could communicate using Mandarin or Taiwanese,
  • (3) were willing to participate in this study and agreed to cooperate with the completion of the questionnaire.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • deafness or a diagnosis of cognitive disorder according to various information sources, such as school health information and notification from parents.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lectures with video-recorded role-play and guided reflection
The learning method used with the intervention group was role-playing with videos and guided reflection.
The experimental group was divided into 6 teams. Before the course, the teacher in charge and each group developed six scenarios: restraint, suicidal intent, respiratory distress, chronic heart failure, medication refusal, and accidental amputation. The researcher guided each group to write scripts about the clinical situations (30 minutes), create role-play videos (50 minutes), and share literature that was helpful in understanding this context (30 minutes). Each student played a role in the filming process. The final film was viewed by all the students during class. Each live class session was 50 minutes in length, with one session per week for 6 weeks. All students were asked to attend six video-viewing sessions and participate in a reflective discussion.
No Intervention: Lectures without video-recorded role-play and guided reflection
The control group was exposed to classroom lectures without video-recorded role-play and guided reflection.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Nursing Student Competence Scale
Time Frame: Baseline data were collected 1 week prior to the intervention study. The second data were collected 1 week after the implementation of the intervention and up to 2 weeks.
The Nursing Student Competence Scale was used to measure students' nursing competence (Huang et al., 2022). Total scale scores ranged from 30 to 150. Higher scores indicate better nursing competence.
Baseline data were collected 1 week prior to the intervention study. The second data were collected 1 week after the implementation of the intervention and up to 2 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Jefferson Scale of Empathy- Healthcare Providers
Time Frame: Baseline data were collected 1 week prior to the intervention study. The second data were collected 1 week after the implementation of the intervention and up to 2 weeks.
Empathy was measured using the Chinese version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy- Healthcare Providers, developed based on a literature review (Cheng et al., 2011). Total scale scores ranged from 20 to 140. Higher scores indicate more positive empathy.
Baseline data were collected 1 week prior to the intervention study. The second data were collected 1 week after the implementation of the intervention and up to 2 weeks.
Change from Caring Behaviours Scale
Time Frame: Baseline data were collected 1 week prior to the intervention study. The second data were collected 1 week after the implementation of the intervention and up to 2 weeks.
The Caring Behaviours Scale, with 27 items, was used to measure students' caring behaviours (Lin, 2001; Pai et al., 2013). Total scale scores ranged from 27 to 108. Higher scores indicate a greater frequency of caring behaviors.
Baseline data were collected 1 week prior to the intervention study. The second data were collected 1 week after the implementation of the intervention and up to 2 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sheng-Miauh Huang, PhD, Mackay Medical College

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 21MMHIS315e

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Competence

Clinical Trials on video-recorded role-play and guided reflection

Subscribe