- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05486923
Validity and Reliability Evaluation of the PRO-CTCAE for Adult-type Diffuse Gliomas Patients in Chinese Population (VERONICA)
Validity and Reliability Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) for Adult-type Diffuse Gliomas Patients in Chinese Population
Given the increasing importance of patient's perspective in adverse events reporting, Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE™) has been proposed as new PRO measures in oncology; however, its implementation has not yet been evaluated in glioma patients, and standardized selection process of priority symptom terms has not been applied.
The study focuses on Chinese adult-type diffuse glioma patients. First, based on information queries, expert consultation research, online Delphi survey, and survey data analysis, the investigators will determine the questionnaire terms for PRO-CTCAE™ for adult-type diffuse gliomas patients. In the next stage, a prospective, multi-center, real-world study to assess the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the customized PRO-CTCAE™ for adult-type diffuse gliomas patients in Chinese population will be launched (VERONICA).
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
First, based on information queries, expert consultation research, online Delphi survey, and survey data analysis, the investigators will determine the questionnaire terms for PRO-CTCAE™ for adult-type diffuse gliomas patients.
A total of 16 experts (13 neurosurgeons, 2 radiotherapists, 1 psychiatrist) from 14 medical centers in China were invited to participate in a consensus-seeking 2-round online Delphi survey. Participants rated the level of their agreement with each symptom term likely to occur during adult diffuse gliomas treatment on a 5-point Likert scale. Terms not reaching consensus over the first round were modified in the second rounds. Consensus was defined as content validity index (CVI) >0.78,coefficient of variation (CV)< 0.35 and average Likert score >3.00.
Second, a prospective, multi-center, real-world study would be performed to assess the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the customized PRO-CTCAE™ for adult diffuse glioma patients in Chinese population.
This study is an observational, prospective, open-label clinical study. It is estimated that 450 adult diffuse glioma patients will be recruited from 17 research centers, and participants will be included in the cohort in chronological order until the target number of cases is reached. The study is expected to be completed within 2 years. In this study, KPS will be used as the anchor point to compare two groups of patients(KPS≤70 and KPS>70, patients with KPS≤70 is not less than 15%).
The investigators do not intervene in the current treatment plan for patients, only observe the treatment plan, and conduct regular questionnaires on the patients: since the patients are enrolled (within 42 days after surgery), six basic follow-ups and long-term follow-ups will be carried out. The whole follow-ups will last for two years.
The follow-up contents include:
Filled out by doctors: demographic information, diagnosis information, anti-tumor treatment (in the past 2 weeks), special treatment (in the past 2 weeks, including but not limited to dehydration drugs and psychotropic drugs, etc.), CTCAE v5.0 (only including the items corresponding to PRO-CTCAE™), KPS.
Filled out by patients: customized PRO-CTCAETM, QLQ-C30, GIC.
Data will be collected using EDC system to ensure patient privacy and data integrity.
The statistical analysis methods:
For the customized PRO-CTCAE™, quantitatively assign each item and its answers (F, S, A, I, P), and then use statistical methods to assess the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the customized PRO-CTCAE™ for adult diffuse glioma patients in Chinese population.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing
-
Beijing, Beijing, China
- Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University
-
Beijing, Beijing, China
- Xuan Wu Hospital, Capital Medical University
-
-
Fujian
-
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
-
-
Guangdong
-
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center
-
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital
-
-
Hubei
-
Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology
-
-
Jiangsu
-
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- Jiangsu People's Hospital
-
-
Shaanxi
-
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
- Xijing Hospital
-
-
Shanghai
-
Shanghai, Shanghai, China
- Changhai Hospital
-
Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200040
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University
-
Shanghai, Shanghai, China
- East Hospital Affiliated To Tongji University
-
Shanghai, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Hospital
-
-
Yunnan
-
Kunming, Yunnan, China
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pathologically diagnosed adult diffuse glioma patients( including astrocytoma, IDH-mutant; oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and1p/19q-codeleted; glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype; other adult diffuse glioma NEC/NOS).
- For newly diagnosed patients, the patient has not received the first non-surgical treatment.
- For recurrent patients, the patient has not received the first non-surgical treatment after the recurrence.
- 18 to 85 years old.
- No significant cognitive impairment based on researchers' judgment.
- Patients can use mobile phones or computers on their own or with the help of others, read and understand Chinese, at least with primary school culture.
- Patients are undergoing anti-tumor treatment and continue to receive treatment within the next 28 days.
- Patients sign written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are not considered suitable for this study.
- Since the diagnosis, the patient has undergone non-surgical treatment.
- Patients fail to complete the questionnaire within 42 days of signing informed consent.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
KPS less than 70
The patients in this group have Karnofsky performance Status less than 70,and the proportion of them is not less than 15%. Patients need regular follow-up surveys within 2 years after the date of surgery. |
|
KPS more than 70
The patients in this group have Karnofsky performance Status more than 70.
Patients need regular follow-up surveys within 2 years after the date of surgery.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the customized PRO-CTCAE™ for adult-type diffuse gliomas patients in Chinese population
Time Frame: December 1, 2025
|
The investigators will compare the customized PRO-CTCAE™ measurements at multiple visits and test the correlation between PRO-CTCAE™, QLQ-C30 and KPS scores, to access the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the customized PRO-CTCAE™ for adult-type diffuse gliomas patients in Chinese population.
|
December 1, 2025
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Jinsong Wu, Ph.D. & M.D., Huashan Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Gilbert MR, Dignam JJ, Armstrong TS, Wefel JS, Blumenthal DT, Vogelbaum MA, Colman H, Chakravarti A, Pugh S, Won M, Jeraj R, Brown PD, Jaeckle KA, Schiff D, Stieber VW, Brachman DG, Werner-Wasik M, Tremont-Lukats IW, Sulman EP, Aldape KD, Curran WJ Jr, Mehta MP. A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):699-708. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308573.
- Armstrong TS, Wefel JS, Wang M, Gilbert MR, Won M, Bottomley A, Mendoza TR, Coens C, Werner-Wasik M, Brachman DG, Choucair AK, Mehta M. Net clinical benefit analysis of radiation therapy oncology group 0525: a phase III trial comparing conventional adjuvant temozolomide with dose-intensive temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 10;31(32):4076-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.6067. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
- Yeung AR, Pugh SL, Klopp AH, Gil KM, Wenzel L, Westin SN, Gaffney DK, Small W Jr, Thompson S, Doncals DE, Cantuaria GHC, Yaremko BP, Chang A, Kundapur V, Mohan DS, Haas ML, Kim YB, Ferguson CL, Deshmukh S, Bruner DW, Kachnic LA. Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (RT) Compared With Standard RT: A Report From the NRG Oncology RTOG 1203 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 20;38(15):1685-1692. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02381. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
- Basch E, Reeve BB, Mitchell SA, Clauser SB, Minasian LM, Dueck AC, Mendoza TR, Hay J, Atkinson TM, Abernethy AP, Bruner DW, Cleeland CS, Sloan JA, Chilukuri R, Baumgartner P, Denicoff A, St Germain D, O'Mara AM, Chen A, Kelaghan J, Bennett AV, Sit L, Rogak L, Barz A, Paul DB, Schrag D. Development of the National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Sep 29;106(9):dju244. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju244. Print 2014 Sep.
- Basch E, Deal AM, Kris MG, Scher HI, Hudis CA, Sabbatini P, Rogak L, Bennett AV, Dueck AC, Atkinson TM, Chou JF, Dulko D, Sit L, Barz A, Novotny P, Fruscione M, Sloan JA, Schrag D. Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 20;34(6):557-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0830. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
- Armstrong TS, Dirven L, Arons D, Bates A, Chang SM, Coens C, Espinasse C, Gilbert MR, Jenkinson D, Kluetz P, Mendoza T, Rubinstein L, Sul J, Weller M, Wen PY, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJB. Glioma patient-reported outcome assessment in clinical care and research: a Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology collaborative report. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):e97-e103. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30796-X.
- Basch E, Geoghegan C, Coons SJ, Gnanasakthy A, Slagle AF, Papadopoulos EJ, Kluetz PG. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Drug Development and US Regulatory Review: Perspectives From Industry, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Patient. JAMA Oncol. 2015 Jun;1(3):375-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0530.
- Cagney DN, Sul J, Huang RY, Ligon KL, Wen PY, Alexander BM. The FDA NIH Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools (BEST) resource in neuro-oncology. Neuro Oncol. 2018 Aug 2;20(9):1162-1172. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox242.
- Armstrong TS, Bishof AM, Brown PD, Klein M, Taphoorn MJ, Theodore-Oklota C. Determining priority signs and symptoms for use as clinical outcomes assessments in trials including patients with malignant gliomas: Panel 1 Report. Neuro Oncol. 2016 Mar;18 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii1-ii12. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov267.
- Dueck AC, Mendoza TR, Mitchell SA, Reeve BB, Castro KM, Rogak LJ, Atkinson TM, Bennett AV, Denicoff AM, O'Mara AM, Li Y, Clauser SB, Bryant DM, Bearden JD 3rd, Gillis TA, Harness JK, Siegel RD, Paul DB, Cleeland CS, Schrag D, Sloan JA, Abernethy AP, Bruner DW, Minasian LM, Basch E; National Cancer Institute PRO-CTCAE Study Group. Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1051-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2639.
- Trask PC, Dueck AC, Piault E, Campbell A. Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: Methods for item selection in industry-sponsored oncology clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2018 Dec;15(6):616-623. doi: 10.1177/1740774518799985. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- KY2022-681
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Glioma
-
University of California, San FranciscoPacific Pediatric Neuro-Oncology ConsortiumRecruitingPediatric Cancer | Low-grade Glioma | Low Grade Glioma of Brain | Recurrent Low Grade GliomaUnited States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Food and Drug Administration (FDA)Active, not recruitingRecurrent Glioblastoma | Recurrent Malignant Glioma | Refractory Malignant Glioma | Recurrent WHO Grade III Glioma | Recurrent WHO Grade II Glioma | Refractory Glioblastoma | Refractory WHO Grade II Glioma | Refractory WHO Grade III GliomaUnited States
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaBlue Earth Diagnostics; Dragon Master FoundationRecruitingGlioma | Low-grade Glioma | Glioma, Malignant | Low Grade Glioma of Brain | Glioma IntracranialUnited States
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaBlue Earth Diagnostics; Dragon Master FoundationRecruitingGlioma | High Grade Glioma | Glioma, Malignant | Diffuse Glioma | Glioma IntracranialUnited States
-
ChimerixOncoceutics, Inc.TerminatedGlioblastoma | Diffuse Midline Glioma | H3 K27M Glioma | Thalamic Glioma | Infratentorial Glioma | Basal Ganglia GliomaUnited States
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterRecruitingWHO Grade 3 Glioma | Recurrent Malignant Glioma | WHO Grade 2 Glioma | Recurrent WHO Grade 3 Glioma | Recurrent WHO Grade 4 Glioma | WHO Grade 4 GliomaUnited States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingGlioblastoma | Malignant Glioma | WHO Grade III Glioma | Recurrent Glioma | Refractory GliomaUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoBeiGene USA, Inc.Active, not recruitingGlioblastoma | Malignant Glioma | Recurrent Glioblastoma | Recurrent WHO Grade III Glioma | WHO Grade III Glioma | IDH2 Gene Mutation | IDH1 Gene Mutation | Low Grade Glioma | Recurrent WHO Grade II Glioma | WHO Grade II GliomaUnited States
-
Sabine Mueller, MD, PhDNot yet recruitingGlioblastoma | Diffuse Midline Glioma, H3 K27M-Mutant | High-grade Glioma | High-Grade Glioma (WHO III-IV) | Diffuse Hemispheric Glioma, H3G34 MutantUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)SuspendedGlioma | High Grade Glioma | Malignant Glioma | Gliomas | Low Grade GliomaUnited States