Quantitative Fluorescence Angiography With ICG for Perfusion Assessment During Surgery (SPY Q-ICG PAS)

November 27, 2023 updated by: Lorenzo Cinelli, IRCCS San Raffaele

SPY Portable Handheld Imaging (SPY-PHI) System With SPY-QP Software for Quantitative Fluorescence Angiography With IndoCyanine Green for Perfusion Assessment During Surgery

The accurate assessment of intraoperative tissue perfusion is essential in any branch of surgery. Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most feared complications following gastrointestinal surgery, with potentially threatening consequences resulting in worsened short- and long-term outcomes. Consistently, a recent meta-analysis showed a correlation between AL and shorter disease-free survival in colorectal surgery. Despite its multifactorial origin, AL is highly related to inadequate visceral perfusion. Traditionally, perfusion assessment and subsequent anastomotic viability have been evaluated by surgeons using intraoperative indicators, such as color, pulsation of vessels, presence of peristalsis and bleeding from the resection lines. However, these clinical parameters are not able to reliably assess the real visceral perfusion and their evaluation is limited in minimally invasive surgery. Hence, the growing interest for innovative techniques able to properly assess tissue perfusion. Among these, the fluorescence angiography (FA) with indocyanine green (ICG) has become increasingly popular during the last decade, although its approval for biomedical purposes by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) dates back to 1956. ICG is an amphiphilic, non-toxic, tricarbocyanine iodide dye that can be safely injected intravenously and is exclusively eliminated by the liver, without any absorption. Thanks to its fluorescent properties, it allows the real-time visualization of tissue vascularization. FA with ICG has shown promising results for the evaluation of perfusion in numerous surgical procedures, thus leading to modifications of the surgical strategy and consequently to a decrease in the rates of AL. On the other hand, ICG interpretation is subjective, based on the evaluation of fluorescence performed by the operating surgeon. These results lack into a high inter-observer variability and affect the possibility to obtain objective, reproducible and reliable tissue perfusion assessments.

Quantitative fluorescence angiography with ICG (Q-ICG) could overcome these limitations. In Q-ICG the fluorescence signal is elaborated by a new computer quantification algorithm and translated into a fluorescence-time curve (FTC), from which several Q-ICG parameters and values can be extracted. Given the power of ICG in reflecting the perfusion of examined tissues, a new quantification algorithm has the potential to turn the subjective parameters derived from surgeon's perspective into objective numeric values.

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate which Q-ICG values provided by a new quantification algorithm correspond to subjective perfusion parameters usually evaluated by the surgeon in patients undergoing left colon, rectal or esophagogastric resections.

The secondary aim is to evaluate possible correlations between Q-ICG values provided by the quantification algorithm and perioperative outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study is designed as a prospective, observational, monocentric, cohort study on algorithm. At our Institution ICG is already used routinely to assess visceral perfusion during gastrointestinal operations. We plan to enroll 70 patients for esophagogastric resections and 140 patients for colorectal resections. Firstly, the adequacy of colon or gastric perfusion will be assessed by the surgical team in the traditional way. Color, pulsatile flow of vessels (right gastroepiploic arcade for the gastric conduit, marginal artery for the colon), presence of peristalsis and bleeding from the colic resection lines will be considered as parameters of perfusion. Then, ICG will be injected, Q-ICG analysis will be performed in all the patients by using a new quantification algorithm and data will be recorded and reported in a specific Database. The surgical strategy will not be modified based on Q-ICG results.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

239

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Milan, Italy, 20132
        • Recruiting
        • Lorenzo Cinelli
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the trial
  • Male and Female, Age > 18 years
  • Patients undergoing left colon, rectal or esophagogastric resections
  • Patients with malignant or benign disease
  • Minimally invasive or open approach surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absence of esophagogastric or colorectal reconstruction (e.g. Miles procedure)
  • Limited sigmoid resection without ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery
  • Known allergies, hypersensitivity or intolerance to indocyanine green (ICG) or iodine contrast agents,
  • Patients with hyperthyroidism or benign thyroid tumor
  • Acute or chronic kidney failure (stage ≥ 3)
  • Pregnant or lactating women, or with a positive pregnancy test performed before surgery
  • Any clinical condition for which, in the opinion of the investigator, participation would not be in the best interest of the patient or that could prevent, limit, or confound the protocol-specified assessments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum intensity of ICG fluorescence
Time Frame: One timepoint: at day 0, after the externalization of colon/stomach, before packing the colorectal/esophagogastric anastomosis.
% (absolute value)
One timepoint: at day 0, after the externalization of colon/stomach, before packing the colorectal/esophagogastric anastomosis.
Time to first ICG fluorescence signal
Time Frame: One timepoint: at day 0, after the externalization of colon/stomach, before packing the colorectal/esophagogastric anastomosis.
seconds
One timepoint: at day 0, after the externalization of colon/stomach, before packing the colorectal/esophagogastric anastomosis.
Time-to-peak
Time Frame: One timepoint: at day 0, after the externalization of colon/stomach, before packing the colorectal/esophagogastric anastomosis.
seconds
One timepoint: at day 0, after the externalization of colon/stomach, before packing the colorectal/esophagogastric anastomosis.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation with postoperative outcomes
Time Frame: From day 0 to day 30 after discharge
The rate of anastomotic leakage in patients who underwent colorectal or esophagogastric resections
From day 0 to day 30 after discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 16, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Complication of Surgical Procedure

Clinical Trials on SPY Portable Handheld Imaging (SPY-PHI) System with SPY-QP Software

3
Subscribe