Injection of Tenoxicam Versus Arthrocentesis Alone in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis

August 10, 2022 updated by: Zeynep Bayramoglu, Ataturk University

Does Intra-articular Injection of Tenoxicam After Arthrocentesis Heal Outcomes of Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis? A Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of the study is to examine the effectiveness of arthrocentesis plus tenoxicam injection and to compare it with arthrocentesis alone in patients with TMJ-OA.

Thirty patients with TMJ-OA who were treated randomly with either arthrocentesis plus tenoxicam injection (TX group) or arthrocentesis alone (control group) were examined. Maximum mouth opening (MMO), visual analog scale (VAS) pain values, and joint sounds were the outcome variables, which were evaluated at pre-treatment and at 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ-OA) is a very painful disease that disrupts the patient's comfort of life. Arthrocentesis alone or in combination with intraarticular injections is highly effective in the treatment of TMJ-OA. It reduces pain, increases mouth opening, and improves jaw movements. In intra-articular injections, hyaluronic acid, platelet-rich plasma, corticosteroids, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) are used. Tenoxicam is an NSAID that is used systemically or locally in joint diseases such as acute or chronic inflammatory rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. It has been reported that its long-lasting analgesic effect and anti-inflammatory effect are higher in intra-articular administration than in oral and intravenous administrations , to our knowledge, there has been no such study analysing the effectiveness of intra-articular application of tenoxicam in patients with TMJ-OA. The aim of the study is to examine the effectiveness of arthrocentesis plus tenoxicam injection and to compare it with arthrocentesis alone in patients with TMJ-OA.

Thirty patients with TMJ-OA who were treated randomly with either arthrocentesis plus tenoxicam injection (TX group) or arthrocentesis alone (control group) were examined. Maximum mouth opening (MMO), visual analog scale (VAS) pain values, and joint sounds were the outcome variables, which were evaluated at pre-treatment and at 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Erzurum, Turkey, 25240
        • Ataturk University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical and radiological diagnosis of TMJ-OA
  • 18 years of age and older
  • Sufficient clinical data at baseline and follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled systemic disease
  • Neurological disease
  • Previous TMJ surgery
  • Malignant disease in the head and neck region

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Tenoxicam
The Tenoxicam group (n:16) received both arthrocentesis and a 2-ml injection of tenoxicam (Oksamen-L, Mustafa Nevzat İlaç Sanayi, Istanbul, Turkey) to the temporomandibular joint.
After arthrocentesis procedure, 2-ml injection of tenoxicam (Oksamen-L, Mustafa Nevzat İlaç Sanayi, Istanbul, Turkey) to the temporomandibular joint
Other Names:
  • Arthrocentesis
Active Comparator: Control
Only arthrocentesis was given to patients in the control group
After arthrocentesis procedure, 2-ml injection of tenoxicam (Oksamen-L, Mustafa Nevzat İlaç Sanayi, Istanbul, Turkey) to the temporomandibular joint
Other Names:
  • Arthrocentesis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain on Tmj (Visual analog scale(VAS) was used.)
Time Frame: Change from baseline pain on TMJ at six months
Pain scores of Temporomandibular joint on a visual analog scale.To measure the VAS value, a 10-cm-long numbered line was created. The patient chose a point on the line, the corresponding value was measured with a ruler, and a score was given. 0 means no pain and best outcome score; 10 means maximum pain and the worst score.
Change from baseline pain on TMJ at six months
Maximum Mouth Opening(MMO) (A ruler was used)
Time Frame: Change from baseline maximum mouth opening at six months
MMO was gaged with a ruler between the incisal edges of the maxillar and mandibular central incisors when the patient open the mouth maximum. The score was written in mm.
Change from baseline maximum mouth opening at six months
Joint sounds (Visual analog scale was used to measure.)
Time Frame: Change from baseline joint sounds at six months
Temporomandibular joint sounds was measured with Visual analog scale (VAS).To measure the VAS value, a 10-cm-long numbered line was created. The patient chose a point on the line, the corresponding value was measured with a ruler, and a score was given. 0 means no sounds and best outcome score; 10 means maximum sound and the worst score.
Change from baseline joint sounds at six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Zeynep Bayramoglu, Ataturk University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 3, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 7, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 21, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthrocentesis

Clinical Trials on Tenoxicam Injectable Product

Subscribe