Social Support Intervention Targeting Patients Treated for Cardiac Disease Who Experience Loneliness

March 28, 2023 updated by: Selina Kikkenborg Berg, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Feasibility Randomized Trial of a Social Support Intervention Plus Usual Care Versus Usual Care, Targeting Patients Treated for Cardiac Disease Who Experience Loneliness

Introduction: In patients treated for cardiac disease, loneliness is known to contribute negatively to health behavior, health outcome and increase risk of cardiac and all-cause mortality. Even so, in health care research, social support interventional studies targeting patients who experience loneliness is lacking.

Aim: To determine the feasibility of an individually structured social support intervention targeting patients treated for cardiac disease who experience loneliness.

Design: A feasibility study based on randomized clinical trial design with 1:1 randomization to a 6-month social support program, plus usual care (intervention) versus usual care, (i.e., regular guidelines-based follow-up). Intervention: Patients classified as high risk lonely according to the High Risk Loneliness tool will be provided with an informal caregiver in the six months rehabilitation phase following cardiac disease treatment. The informal caregiver will be designated by the patient from the existing social network or a peer, depending on patients' preferences. The core content of the intervention is through nurse consultations at baseline, one, three and six months, to enhance and reinforce the informal caregiver's competences to be a social support resource. The theoretical framework of the nurse consolations will be based on Middle-range theory of self-care.

Outcome: Feasibility will be evaluated in terms of acceptability and adherence according to predefined feasibility criteria. The preliminary effect of the intervention on patient-reported outcomes, health behaviors and health outcomes will be evaluated in the intervention and the control group at baseline, one, three, six and twelve months.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • Recruiting
        • Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients treated for Ischemic heart disease (CABG or PCI), valve disease (TAVR, SAVR), and arrhythmia (ICD, pacemaker implantation or ablation) treated at Rigshospitalet and classified as high risk lonely according to the High Risk Loneliness (HiRL) tool

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are unable to provide written consent, therefore, patients with severe cognitive or physical dysfunction will not be approached

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Six month social support intervention following in hospital cardiac treatment
Contact ones a week with Informal caregiver or peer support
Other Names:
  • Loneliness reduction
No Intervention: Control
Regular follow-up

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility, Acceptability
Time Frame: Measured at baseline
Percentage of eligible patients who agree to participate in the trial
Measured at baseline
Feasibility, Adherence
Time Frame: 6 months follow-up after in-hospital cardiac treatment
Percentage of patients in contact with the informal caregiver at least once a week face to face, by phone or virtually.
6 months follow-up after in-hospital cardiac treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measure of social network members as informal caregivers
Time Frame: Measured at baseline
Percentage of potential caregivers who accepts to be an informal caregiver
Measured at baseline
Measure of informal caregivers
Time Frame: 3 months follow-up after in-hospital cardiac treatment
Percentage of informal caregivers participating in all three intervention consultations with the trial staff
3 months follow-up after in-hospital cardiac treatment
Resource consumption
Time Frame: 6 months follow-up after in-hospital cardiac treatment
Time resources used to complete the three nurse consultations
6 months follow-up after in-hospital cardiac treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Loneliness
Time Frame: Baseline, one, three, six and twelve months
High Risk Loneliness tool. 2 item. Screeningscore 0 to 2, with a higher score indicating worse outcome
Baseline, one, three, six and twelve months
Self-care
Time Frame: Baseline, one, three, six and twelve months
Self Care Self-Efficacy scale. 10 item scale answered on a Likert scale 1 to 5 with a lower score indicating worse outcome
Baseline, one, three, six and twelve months
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline, one, three, six and twelve months
HeartQoL. 10 item scale answered on a Likert scale 0-5, with a higher score indicating worse outcome
Baseline, one, three, six and twelve months
Anxiety and Depression
Time Frame: Baseline, one, three, six and twelve months
Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS). 14 item scale. The scale offers two scores, HADS-A (anxiety) and HADS-D (depression). Answered in a Likert scale with a higher score indicating worse outcome
Baseline, one, three, six and twelve months
Health behaviors
Time Frame: Baseline, one, three, six and twelve months
Smoking, alcohol consumption, weight, physical activity, participation in cardiac rehabilitation
Baseline, one, three, six and twelve months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HeartBuddyPilot

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Feasibility

Clinical Trials on Social support

Subscribe