Construction and Effect Evaluation of Integrated Care Model for Pulmonary Infection in Stroke Patients With Tracheotomy

August 15, 2022 updated by: Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
  1. To understand the occurrence of pulmonary infection in stroke patients with tracheotomy, and to clarify the current situation of clinical nursing.
  2. Construct a standardized, systematic and scientific integrated care model to control the severity of pulmonary infection in non-acute stroke patients with simple tracheotomy.
  3. To evaluate the clinical application effect of integrated care model of pulmonary infection in stroke patients with tracheotomy.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

1. Research content This study involves two parts: construction and effect evaluation.

  1. The construction link includes: retrospective analysis of patient data, clinical observation, literature review, expert consultation, and pre-experiment.
  2. Effect evaluation: The integrated care model was applied to the clinic, and the patients' CPIS score, Beck oral score, ZBI caregiver burden score, EQ-5D score and hospitalization cost were collected to evaluate the effect of the model.

2. The grouping method Convenience sampling method was used to select patients with simple tracheotomy for non-acute stroke who were admitted to the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of Shenzhen Second People's Hospital as the research object, and the patients before the implementation of the integrated care model(May-July 2022) were set as the control group , the patients after the implementation of the integrated care model (August-October 2022) were set as the intervention group.

3. Sample Size Estimation

  1. This study is a quasi-experimental study, and the main outcome indicator is the control of pulmonary infection (CPIS score). Therefore, the sample size estimation method of the group design quantitative data sample mean is adopted.
  2. Based on the results reported in similar research literature, the authors assumed that the CPIS scores of the control group and the intervention group were 3.9±1.5 and 2.8±1.1, respectively. Set β=0.1, power (Power=1-β)=90%, two-sided α=0.05 at the significance level, and the sample size of each group was 32 cases after calculation by G-power3.1 software. According to the 20% dropout rate, the final sample size of each group was 40 cases, and there were 80 cases in the two groups.

4. Statistical analysis Using Excel and IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 software for double entry and analysis, the measurement data that conformed to the normal distribution were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, and the t test was used for comparison between groups; the measurement data that did not conform to the normal distribution were expressed as the median and four The number of quantiles was expressed, and the rank-sum test was used for comparison between groups. The count data were expressed as frequency and percentage, and the chi-square test was used for comparison between groups. The difference was statistically significant with p<0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Shenzhen, Guangdong, China, 518035
        • Recruiting
        • The Second People's Hospital of Shenzhen
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non-acute stroke patients diagnosed by MRI or CT who meet the diagnostic criteria of the "Chinese Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Diseases";
  • Those who meet the diagnostic criteria for pulmonary infection;
  • Age ≥18 years old;
  • Tracheotomy patients who have been off the ventilator or do not need mechanical ventilation;
  • Patients who can cooperate with the research and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients whose vital signs are unstable and may be transferred to ICU for treatment in the future;
  • Patients with malignant tumors or other infectious diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: control group
Implement routine nursing such as: routine oral nursing, tracheostomy, dressing change, sputum suction nursing, oral education, etc.
Experimental: intervention group
Implement comprehensive nursing models such as: admission risk assessment, personalized oral care based on beck oral score, aspiration prevention, airway care, diversified health education
The interventions in this study were to implement basic patient care only and did not involve any invasive procedures. On the basis of routine nursing, the content of nursing intervention was integrated, and a standardized nursing model was formed for clinical application to control the severity of pulmonary infection in patients with simple tracheotomy in the non-acute phase of stroke.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score
Time Frame: Within 1 week of admission
The scale mainly includes 7 indicators of body temperature, white blood cell count, tracheal secretions, oxygenation, chest X-ray, progress of pulmonary exudation, and microbial culture of tracheal aspirates, each with 0 to 2 points, with a total score of 12 If the score is less than 6, the lung infection is considered to be controlled.
Within 1 week of admission
Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score
Time Frame: 3 weeks after admission
The scale mainly includes 7 indicators of body temperature, white blood cell count, tracheal secretions, oxygenation, chest X-ray, progress of pulmonary exudation, and microbial culture of tracheal aspirates, each with 0 to 2 points, with a total score of 12 If the score is less than 6, the lung infection is considered to be controlled.
3 weeks after admission

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Beck Oral Assessment Score(BOAS),modified
Time Frame: Within 1 week of admission
The scale includes five items: lips, gums and oral mucosa, tongue, teeth, and saliva to evaluate the oral hygiene status and functional status. Each item is scored with 1 to 4 points, and the total oral hygiene score is 5 to 20 points. The higher the score, the worse the oral hygiene.
Within 1 week of admission
Beck Oral Assessment Score(BOAS),modified
Time Frame: 3 weeks after admission
The scale includes five items: lips, gums and oral mucosa, tongue, teeth, and saliva to evaluate the oral hygiene status and functional status. Each item is scored with 1 to 4 points, and the total oral hygiene score is 5 to 20 points. The higher the score, the worse the oral hygiene.
3 weeks after admission
Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview, ZBI
Time Frame: Within 1 week of admission
The scale mainly includes 2 dimensions (personal burden and responsibility burden), a total of 22 items, each item is divided into 5 grades according to the severity of the burden, expressed on a scale of 0-4, 0 means never, 4 means almost often. The total score of the scale is 0-88 points, and the higher the score, the heavier the burden of care.
Within 1 week of admission
Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview, ZBI
Time Frame: 3 weeks after admission
The scale mainly includes 2 dimensions (personal burden and responsibility burden), a total of 22 items, each item is divided into 5 grades according to the severity of the burden, expressed on a scale of 0-4, 0 means never, 4 means almost often. The total score of the scale is 0-88 points, and the higher the score, the heavier the burden of care.
3 weeks after admission
EuroQol-5 Dimension, EQ-5D
Time Frame: Within 1 week of admission
he Chinese version of the European five-dimensional health scale (EuroQol-5 Dimension, EQ-5D), EQ-5D is a commonly used scale to measure health-related quality of life. The scale is divided into 2 parts: the EQ-5D health description system and the EuroQol-Visual Analogue Score (EQ-VAS). The EQ-5D health description system includes 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, activities of daily living, pain or discomfort, anxiety or depression, and each dimension contains 3 levels: no difficulty, some difficulty, and extreme difficulty. The EQ-VAS uses a score of 0 to 100 to evaluate a patient's current health status, with 100 representing the "best health status in my mind" and 0 representing the "worst health status in my mind".
Within 1 week of admission
EuroQol-5 Dimension, EQ-5D
Time Frame: 3 weeks after admission
he Chinese version of the European five-dimensional health scale (EuroQol-5 Dimension, EQ-5D), EQ-5D is a commonly used scale to measure health-related quality of life. The scale is divided into 2 parts: the EQ-5D health description system and the EuroQol-Visual Analogue Score (EQ-VAS). The EQ-5D health description system includes 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, activities of daily living, pain or discomfort, anxiety or depression, and each dimension contains 3 levels: no difficulty, some difficulty, and extreme difficulty. The EQ-VAS uses a score of 0 to 100 to evaluate a patient's current health status, with 100 representing the "best health status in my mind" and 0 representing the "worst health status in my mind".
3 weeks after admission

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hospital costs
Time Frame: ≥3 weeks
Collection of treatment expenses during hospitalization of patients through the hospital electronic medical record system
≥3 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yan Gao, Ph.D, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 7, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 7, 2026

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 7, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 17, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Contact the principal investigator for data if necessary

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on integrated care model

Subscribe