5-Cog 2.0: A Pragmatic Clinical Trial

April 14, 2026 updated by: Albert Einstein College of Medicine

5-Cog Paradigm to Improve Detection of Cognitive Impairment in Primary Care: Pragmatic Clinical Trial

Cognitive impairment related to dementia is frequently under-diagnosed in primary care settings. This problem is more prevalent in health disparities populations. The investigators developed the 5-Cog brief cognitive assessment that is simple to use, standardized, takes <5 minutes, does not require informants, and accounts for major technical, cultural, and logistical barriers of current assessments. The investigators propose a hybrid Type 1 effectiveness-implementation design in real-world settings to adapt and test the effectiveness of the 5-Cog paradigm to increase detection of cognitive impairment care in older adults presenting with cognitive concerns.

The study aim is to evaluate, using a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial design, the effectiveness of the 5-Cog paradigm to increase 'incident cognitive impairment' detection (new MCI and dementia diagnoses) relative to enhanced usual care in 6,600 older patients presenting with cognitive concerns in 22 primary care clinics in Bronx and Indiana. As diagnosis without action will not improve patient care, 'improved dementia care' will be examined as a secondary outcome. Results will also be examined in NIH designated health disparity populations including underserved minority and socio-economically challenged populations.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cognitive impairment related to dementia is frequently under-diagnosed in primary care settings despite the increasing rates of patient cognitive complaints and the availability of numerous cognitive assessment tools. Missed detection delays treatment of reversible conditions as well as provision of support services and critical planning. This problem is more prevalent among older African-Americans and Hispanics than older whites, and more common in rural than urban populations.

The investigators developed the 5-Cog brief cognitive assessment that is simple to use, standardized, takes <5 minutes, does not require informants, and accounts for major technical, cultural, and logistical barriers of current assessments. The investigators are conducting a simple randomized clinical trial to examine the clinical efficacy of the 5-Cog paradigm (5-Cog brief cognitive assessment paired with a clinical decision-making tool) to improve dementia care in 1,200 predominantly minority sample of older adults with cognitive concerns presenting to a primary care clinic in the Bronx. Interim analysis revealed that the 5-Cog paradigm resulted in an over 8-fold increase in new cognitive impairment diagnoses and over 3-fold increase in improved dementia care actions by primary care physicians compared to an active control arm. Following up on these very promising results, the investigators propose a hybrid Type 1 effectiveness-implementation design in real-world settings to adapt and test the effectiveness of the 5-Cog paradigm to increase detection of cognitive impairment care in older adults presenting with cognitive concerns.

The aim of the pragmatic cluster-randomized trial is to test the clinical effectiveness of the 5-Cog paradigm in increasing cognitive impairment detection and improving dementia care - ascertained via electronic medical record. Randomization will be at the clinic level, and select 22 primary care practices; 6 in Bronx and 18 in urban and rural Indiana. 300 participants per practice will be enrolled for a total of 6,600 older patients with cognitive concerns. Results will also be examined in NIH designated health disparity populations including underserved minority and socio-economically challenged populations.

Outcomes are new cognitive impairment diagnoses (primary) and improved dementia care (secondary) in the 90-day period following presentation of cognitive concern to the primary care physician.

  • New cognitive impairment diagnoses (primary): New diagnosis of dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment by primary care physicians. For patients with a previous diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment in electronic medical record, only a new diagnosis of dementia will be considered as an incident outcome.
  • Improved dementia care (secondary): Any of the following: 1. Tests ordered for reversible causes of cognitive impairment as per published guidelines. 2. New cognitive enhancing medication prescriptions or deprescribing anti-cholinergic. 3. Referral for cognitive/dementia evaluation by specialists (Neurology, Geriatrics, Psychiatry). 4. Referral to social worker or community-based organizations.

Implementation issues and cost-effectiveness of the 5-Cog paradigm will also be examined.

This proposed study focuses on scalable approaches to address the unmet need of early detection of incident cognitive impairment, including in populations that experience health disparities.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

6600

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Bloomington, Indiana, United States, 47405
        • Recruiting
        • Indiana University
        • Contact:
          • Malaz Boustani, MD, MPH
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Malaz Boustani, MD, MPH
    • New York
      • The Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
        • Recruiting
        • Albert Einstein College of Medicine
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Erica Weiss, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 65 years and older
  2. Presence of cognitive concerns
  3. English or Spanish speaking.
  4. Able to see and hear well enough to complete assessments.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior diagnosis of dementia (documented in the electronic medical record or reported by physicians).
  2. Permanent nursing facility residents.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 5-Cog Paradigm (5-Cog battery coupled with clinical decision tool)
A cognitive concern screening will be conducted with patients aged 65 and older prior to their appointment with their primary care physician. If cognitive concerns are endorsed the 5-Cog battery will be conducted. The simple, <5-minute cognitive assessment will reliably identify older persons with cognitive impairment in primary care settings, and flag them for further evaluation. Depending on whether the 5-Cog results are normal or abnormal on any one of the 3 tests, appropriate clinical decision support tools are provided to the primary care physicians in electronic medical record. The primary care physicians are not instructed to follow 5-Cog suggestions verbatim but use their clinical judgment.
A cognitive concern screening will be conducted with patients aged 65 and older prior to their appointment with their primary care physician. If cognitive concerns are endorsed the 5-Cog battery will be conducted. The 5-Cog battery includes the Picture Memory Impairment Screen, Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome diagnosis, and Symbol Match. The simple, <5-minute cognitive assessment will reliably identify older persons with cognitive impairment in primary care settings, and flag them for further evaluation.
Active Comparator: Enhanced usual care
Educational sessions for primary care physicians and clinic staff regarding cognitive detection and medical billing will be conducted. A cognitive concern screening will be conducted with patients aged 65 and older prior to their appointment with their primary care physician. The results will be provided to primary care physicians.
A cognitive concern screening will be conducted with patients aged 65 and older prior to their appointment with their primary care physician. The results will be provided to primary care physicians.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
New cognitive impairment diagnoses in the 90-day period following presentation of cognitive concern to the primary care physician (PCP).
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
The clinical effectiveness of the 5-Cog paradigm on new cognitive impairment detection will be examined by comparing the proportion of 'new Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and dementia diagnoses' over 90-days in the 5-cog paradigm and the enhanced usual care group using generalized linear mixed effects models. For patients with a previous diagnosis of MCI in the electronic medical record, only a new diagnosis of dementia will be considered as an incident outcome.
Up to 90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improved dementia care in the 90-day period following presentation of cognitive concern to the primary care provider (PCP).
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
The clinical effectiveness of the 5-Cog paradigm on improved dementia care will be examined by comparing the proportion of documentation of improved dementia care in the 5-cog paradigm and the enhanced usual care group using generalized linear mixed effects models. Improved dementia care is defined as any of the following: 1. Tests ordered for reversible causes of cognitive impairment as per published guidelines. 2. New cognitive enhancing medication prescriptions or deprescribing anti-cholinergic. 3. Referral for cognitive/dementia evaluation by specialists (Neurology, Geriatrics, Psychiatry). 4. Referral to social worker or community-based organizations.
Up to 90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Malaz Boustani, MD, MPH, Indiana University
  • Principal Investigator: Joe Verghese, MD, Stony Brook University
  • Principal Investigator: Erica Weiss, PhD, Albert Einstein College of Medicie

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 18, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2022-14144
  • 2U01NS105565-07 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available with appropriate ethics committee and data sharing agreements in place.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available within 1 year of study completion.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data access requests will be reviewed by the PI and Steering Committee. Requestors will be required to sign a Data Access Agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on 5-Cog Paradigm (5-Cog battery coupled with clinical decision tool)

Subscribe