Short-term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy in Serious Physical Illness (ORPHYS)

December 7, 2025 updated by: Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

ORPHYS - Short-term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy in Serious Physical Illness

Life-threatening physical illness may powerfully re-activate existential conflict. There is little evidence to date on the effectiveness of relationship-focused therapies in this patient group.The aim of this study is to pilot a psychodynamic treatment for patients with advanced cancer and high psychological distress.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Severely physically ill patients may experience existential distress symptoms including helplessness, hopelessness, death anxiety, perceived burdensomeness and a sense of pointlessness. The latter can significantly interfere with end-of-life care processes and outcomes (receipt of treatment according to preferences, expression of desire for hastened death). So far, empirically tested psychotherapeutic programs in advanced life-threatening illness have predominantly been ultra-short and applied supportive and resource-oriented techniques. Psychodynamic treatment allows to address clinically significant existential distress through its conceptualization from early relational life experiences.

The aim of this study is to pilot a psychodynamic treatment for patients with advanced cancer and high psychological distress.The inverstigators will

  1. analyse the feasibility of the treatment, and
  2. investigate changes in process- and patient-relevant outcomes over the course of the treatment

The inverstigators will conduct a single-group pre-post study with five assessment points in which 50 adult patients diagnosed with advanced cancer will receive a manualized psychodynamic short-term therapy. Target parameters are assessed by diagnostic interviews, focus interviews, self-assessment questionnaires as well as electronic patient records. For research objective b) the investigators will compare the intervention group with a matched comparison group of a longitudinal cohort sample (NCT04600206). Matching will be based on stress level, demographic, and medical parameters across the 5 assessment points.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Düsseldorf, Germany, 40225
        • Clinical Institute for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Düsseldorf
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Department of Medical Psychology
      • Kassel, Germany, 34127
        • Institute of Social Work, University of Kassel
      • Würzburg, Germany, 97080
        • Psychosomatics, Psychotherapy and Psychooncology, Medicine II, University of Würzburg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years and older
  • UICC stage IV solid tumor
  • Informed consent
  • Current physical condition that allows for at least 12 therapy sessions
  • Indication: Presence of a mental disorder with existential stress and limitations in coping capacity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute suicidality
  • Psychotic disorder (ICD-10: F2 diagnosis)
  • Substance dependence or abuse (ICD-10: F1 diagnosis)
  • Structural deficits that interfere with attending to regular appointments
  • Other psychotherapeutic treatment
  • Severe cognitive impairment
  • Severe physical impairment
  • Insufficient German to give informed consent and complete self-report questionnaires

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients
Adult patients across all phases of advanced disease (UICC stage IV solid tumor) from diagnosis to terminal stages
A short-term psychodynamic therapy that focuses on the special inner and outer situation of patients with a serious physical illness, especially with regard to the importance of relationships in a limited lifetime.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Safety and Tolerability)
Time Frame: up to 12-months follow-up
Will be assessed via Inventory for the Balanced Assessment of Negative Effects of Psychotherapy (INEP, Ladwig, Rief & Nestoriuc, 2014).
up to 12-months follow-up
Acceptance
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Will be assessed via drop-out rates (number of patients not completing at least 12 sessions) and treatment compliance (number of sessions missed).
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Treatment adherence
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Will be assessed via qualitative analysis of therapeutic session protocols and audio recordings.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Therapeutic competence
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Will be assessed via qualitative analysis of supervision protocols.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Treatment feasibility
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Will be assessed via semi-structured qualitative interviews.
through study completion, an average of 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Therapeutic alliance I
Time Frame: 3-, 6- 9- and 12-months follow-up
Will be assessed via California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales (CALPAS, Marmar & Gaston, 1989) for patients and therapists.
3-, 6- 9- and 12-months follow-up
Interpersonal problems
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months follow up
Will be assessed via inventory for assessment of interpersonal problems (IIP-D-32, Thomas, Brähler & Strauß, 2011).
Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months follow up
Therapeutic process
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Will be assessed via semi-structured qualitative interviews.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Therapeutic alliance II
Time Frame: 3-, 6- 9- and 12-months follow-up
Will be assessed via Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAQ, Luborsky et al., 1996) (IIP-D-32, Thomas, Brähler & Strauß, 2011) for patients and therapists.
3-, 6- 9- and 12-months follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Desire for hastened death
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up
Will be assessed using the short form of the Schedule of Attitudes Toward Hastened Death (SAHD-A, Kolva et al., 2017).
Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up
Suicidal ideation
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up
Will be assessed using the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS, Kliem & Brähler, 2015).
Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up
Coping and Demoralisation
Time Frame: a) Baseline and 6-months follow-up, b) Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up
Will be assessed using the a) Structured Interview for Psychological Adjustment and Demoralisation (Bobevski & Kissane, 2019) and b) Demoralisation Scale-II (DS-II, Robinson et al., 2016).
a) Baseline and 6-months follow-up, b) Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up
Prevalence of adjustment disorder
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months follow-up
Will be assessed according to International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) using the Adjustment Disorder Module of the CIDI (Composite International Diagnostic Interview, (Perkonigg et al., 2018).
Baseline and 6-months follow-up
Aggressiveness of care
Time Frame: 4 weeks prior to death
Will be assessed according to the criteria by Earle et al., 2003: receipt of chemotherapy in the last two weeks of life, emergency hospital admissions or intensive-care treatment during the last month of life. Will be obtained from medical chart reviews for deceased patients.
4 weeks prior to death
Prevalence of affective and anxiety disorders
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months follow-up
Will be assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (SCID-5, Beesdo-Baum et al., 2019).
Baseline and 6-months follow-up
Death Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up
Will be assessed using the Death Anxiety and Distress Scale (DADDS, Krause etal., 2015).
Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up
Perceived Relatedness
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up
Will be assessed using Subscales (Dependence, Relatedness) of the Depressive Experience Questionnaire (DEQ, Blatt, D'Afflitti & Quinlan, 1976; Blatt et al., 1982).
Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up
End-of-life preparation and adaption
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up
Will be assessed using the Revised Loss Orientation and Life Engagement in Advanced Cancer Scale (LOLES, Vehling et al., 2018).
Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up
Dignity related distress
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up
Will be assessed using the Sense of Dignity Item (SDI, Chochinov et al., 2002) and the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI, Chochinov, 2008).
Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up
Meaningfulness in life and crisis of meaning
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up
Will be assessed using the Sources of Meaning and Meaning in Life Questionnaire (SoMe, Schnell, 2009).
Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up
Quality of life at the end of life
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up
Will be assessed using a subscale (Life completion) of the Quality of Life at the End of Life-Cancer-Psychosocial Questionnaire (Qual-EC-P).
Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up
Coping resources
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up
Will be assessed using subscales (coping competence, adaptability) of the questionnaire for patient competence in coping with cancer (PCQ, Aderhold et al., 2019).
Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up
Need for and utilisation of psychosocial support for existential distress
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up
Will be assessed using the Structured questionnaire of psychosocial support needs for existential distress.
Baseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months-follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sigrun Vehling, PD, PhD, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 6, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

August 6, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for patients with serious physical illness (ORPHYS)

Subscribe