Effect of Nasal Positive Airway Pressure Versus Standard Care on Oxygenation and Ventilation During Propofol-based Sedation for Colonoscopy in Patients With High Risk of Airway Obstruction

March 5, 2024 updated by: Erikka L Washington, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Effect of Nasal Positive Airway Pressure Versus Standard Care on Oxygenation and Ventilation During Propofol-based Sedation for Colonoscopy in Patients With High Risk of Airway Obstruction: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

The purpose of this study is to to compare oxygenation and ventilation on spontaneously ventilating obese patients or those with diagnosed or undiagnosed Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing day colonoscopy under Propofol based sedation, between the SuperNO2VA Et™ nasal positive airway pressure (PAP) device and routine care with face mask for oxygen (O2).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

139

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing colonoscopy
  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Physical Status I-III
  • BMI ≥35 kg/m2 and/or documented or suspected Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inpatient status
  • Active Congestive Heart Failure Exacerbation
  • Untreated ischemic heart disease
  • Acute exacerbation of respiratory disorders, including Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma
  • Emergent procedures
  • Pregnancy
  • Previous enrollment in this study
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Additional medical testing planned for the same day
  • History of allergic reaction to Propofol
  • Tracheostomy
  • Supra-glottic or sub-glottic tumor
  • Gastrointestinal tract obstruction or delayed transit (including delayed gastric emptying, gastric bezoar, achalasia, toxic megacolon).
  • Prisoners
  • Unable to fit SuperNoVa

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A: Standard care with a facemask.
The anesthesia provider will supply oxygen via the closed facemask at 10 liters per minute (LPM)
Experimental: Group B: SuperNO2VA™EtCO2
The anesthesia provider will attach the SuperNO2VA™ EtCO2 circuit port to the hyperinflation bag with the oxygen flow rate to 10 L/min. The oxygenation, continuous positive airway pressure, and ventilation of the subject will be done via SuperNO2VA™EtCO2 (Nasal Oxygenating Ventilating Apparatus)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time taken from initiation of induction to the first airway intervention
Time Frame: end of endoscopy procedure( about 45 minutes form start of procedure)
end of endoscopy procedure( about 45 minutes form start of procedure)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Amount of propofol administered during induction
Time Frame: Within 5 minutes of the start of anesthesia
Within 5 minutes of the start of anesthesia
Total amount of propofol administered during the procedure
Time Frame: end of procedure (about 45 minutes after start)
end of procedure (about 45 minutes after start)
Change in alertness of subject as assessed by the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (MOAAS)
Time Frame: prior to endoscopic intubation,during the procedure
This is scored from 0(no response)-5(response to your name spoken in a normal tone), a higher number indicating more alertness
prior to endoscopic intubation,during the procedure
Time taken from induction to endoscopic insertion
Time Frame: within 5 minutes of start of sedation
within 5 minutes of start of sedation
Incidence of procedural interruptions as assessed by the number of times the endoscope is removed from the patient
Time Frame: end of procedure (about 45 minutes form start)
end of procedure (about 45 minutes form start)
Duration of procedural interruptions as assessed by the length of time the endoscope is removed from the patient
Time Frame: end of procedure (about 45 minutes form start)
end of procedure (about 45 minutes form start)
Number of participants who received airway maneuvers
Time Frame: end of procedure (about 45 minutes form start)
end of procedure (about 45 minutes form start)
Time taken for airway maneuvers
Time Frame: end of procedure (about 45 minutes form start)
end of procedure (about 45 minutes form start)
Reason for airway maneuvers
Time Frame: end of procedure (about 45 minutes form start)
end of procedure (about 45 minutes form start)
Time taken for the entire procedure
Time Frame: end of procedure (about 45 minutes form start)
end of procedure (about 45 minutes form start)
Recovery time as assessed by the time when subject was ready for discharge
Time Frame: at time of discharge( about one hour form end of procedure)
at time of discharge( about one hour form end of procedure)
Recovery time as assessed by the actual time when subject was discharged
Time Frame: at time of discharge( about one hour form end of procedure)
at time of discharge( about one hour form end of procedure)
Patient satisfaction as assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS)
Time Frame: at time of discharge(about one hour form end of procedure)
This will be scored from 0-10, a higher score indicating more satisfaction
at time of discharge(about one hour form end of procedure)
Number of participants that tolerated the SuperNO2VA™EtCO2
Time Frame: from start of procedure to end of procedure (about 45 minutes)
from start of procedure to end of procedure (about 45 minutes)
Anesthesiologist satisfaction score as assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS)
Time Frame: end of procedure
This will be scored from 0-10, a higher score indicating more satisfaction
end of procedure
Number of participants that had incidences of cardiac complications
Time Frame: from start of procedure to end of procedure (about 45 minutes)
from start of procedure to end of procedure (about 45 minutes)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Erikka Washington, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 19, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 9, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 9, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Obesity

Clinical Trials on Standard care with a facemask.

3
Subscribe