Evaluation of Different Methods for Preoxygenation

August 7, 2023 updated by: Malin Jonsson Fagerlund

The goal of this randomised cross-over study is to compare pre-oxygenation using a standard nasal cannula to pre-oxygenation using humidified high-flow nasal oxygen and a tight-fitting facemask in adult volunteers with a BMI below 30 not suffering from pulmonary or cardiac comorbidity.

The main question it aims to answer is:

- Are there any differences in the effectiveness of pre-oxygenation using a standard nasal cannula compared to using a traditional facemask and pre-oxygenation using humidified high-flow nasal oxygen?

Participants will be pre-oxygenated with 100% oxygen during four minutes intervals. All participants will be pre-oxygenated with various flow rates using a standard nasal cannula, a facemask and humidified high-flow nasal oxygen. End-tidal oxygen concentrations will be measured continuously in order to evaluate the effectiveness of pre-oxygenation.

Each volunteer will be pre-oxygenated repeatedly, with different flow rates, with all three methods of pre-oxygenation and act as its own control.

During facemask pre-oxygenation volunteers will be pre-oxygenated using both tidal volume breathing for four minutes and with eight vital capacity breaths. During pre-oxygenation using the standard nasal cannula flow rates will vary between 15 and 50 l/min. Pre-oxygenation using humidified high-flow nasal oxygen will be performed with flow rates varying between 30 and 50 l/min. Series will be conducted with volunteers breathing with both opened and closed mouth as well as with four minutes of tidal volume breathing and eight vital capacity breaths.

All volunteers will start with facemask pre-oxygenation. They will thereafter be randomised to pre-oxygenation with either a standard nasal cannula or humidified high-flow nasal oxygen. Lastly, they will be pre-oxygenated with the remaining method according to the randomisation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pre-oxygenation before anaesthesia induction is mostly performed using a tight-fitting facemask. Recently, studies have shown that pre-oxygenation using humidified high-flow nasal oxygen is equally effective as pre-oxygenation using a standard tight-fitting facemask. Pre-oxygenation using humidified high-flow nasal oxygen has several potential advantages including improved patient comfort and the possibility of a seamless transition from pre-oxygenation to apnoeic oxygenation. Unfortunately, this technique requires an additional machine which can be expensive and also difficult to use in settings outside a hospital.

In this study, pre-oxygenation using a standard nasal cannula delivering a high flow of oxygen will be compared with standard facemask pre-oxygenation and pre-oxygenation using humidified high-flow nasal oxygen in adult volunteers with a BMI below 30 not suffering from pulmonary or cardiac comorbidity.

The main question it aims to answer is:

- Are there any differences in the effectiveness of pre-oxygenation using a standard nasal cannula compared to using a traditional facemask and pre-oxygenation using humidified high-flow nasal oxygen?

Participants will be pre-oxygenated with 100% oxygen during four minutes intervals. All participants will be pre-oxygenated with various flow rates using a standard nasal cannula, a facemask and humidified high-flow nasal oxygen. End-tidal oxygen concentrations will be measured continuously in order to evaluate the effectiveness of pre-oxygenation.

Each volunteer will be pre-oxygenated repeatedly, with different flow rates, with all three methods of pre-oxygenation and act as its own control.

During facemask pre-oxygenation volunteers will be pre-oxygenated using both tidal volume breathing for four minutes and with eight vital capacity breaths. During pre-oxygenation using the standard nasal cannula flow rates will vary between 15 and 50 l/min. Pre-oxygenation using humidified high-flow nasal oxygen will be performed with flow rates varying between 30 and 50 l/min. Series will be conducted with volunteers breathing with both opened and closed mouth as well as with four minutes of tidal volume breathing and eight vital capacity breaths.

All volunteers will start with facemask pre-oxygenation. They will thereafter be randomised to pre-oxygenation with either a standard nasal cannula or humidified high-flow nasal oxygen. Lastly, they will be pre-oxygenated with the remaining method according to the randomisation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Karolinska University Hospital, Solna
      • Stockholm, Sweden, SE-17176
        • Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ability to understand and sign informed consent
  • Age 25-65 years
  • Body mass index <30

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Heart disease
  • Respiratory disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Smoker

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Humidified high-flow oxygen
Humidified high-flow nasal oxygen delivered via the Optiflow device. Repeated series with 100% oxygen with flows varying between 30 to 50 l/min. Volunteers will also be pre-oxygenated with both opened and closed mouth.
Humidified high-flow oxygen delivered via the Optiflow device
Experimental: Standard nasal cannula
Standard nasal cannula connected to an oxygen rotameter Repeated series with 100% oxygen with flows varying between 15 to 50 l/min. Volunteers will also be pre-oxygenated with both opened and closed mouth.
Oxygen delivered with high flows via a standard nasal cannula
Active Comparator: Facemask

Tight-fitting facemask. Two series will be done where pre-oxygenation will be performed with four minutes of tidal volume breathing and eight vital capacity breaths.

This arm is not randomised. All study subjects will start with facemask pre-oxygenation and are thereafter randomised to standard nasal cannula or humidified high-flow nasal cannula.

Oxygen delivered with facemask

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the effectiveness of pre-oxygenation
Time Frame: After 3 minutes of preoxygenation
Compare end-tidal oxygen levels after three minutes of pre-oxygenation using a standard facemask, high-flow nasal oxygen and a standard nasal cannula.
After 3 minutes of preoxygenation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of pre-oxygenation until end-tidal oxygen levels above 80%
Time Frame: After 3 minutes of preoxygenation
Evaluation of end-tidal oxygen levels will be done each minute during all series of pre-oxygenation in order to investigate the time taken until reaching end-tidal levels above 80%. A comparison between the time taken to achieve end-tidal levels above 80% will be done between the different methods of pre-oxygenation as well as the different flow rates.
After 3 minutes of preoxygenation
Duration of pre-oxygenation until end-tidal oxygen levels above 85%
Time Frame: After 3 minutes of preoxygenation
Evaluation of end-tidal oxygen levels will be done each minute during all series of pre-oxygenation in order to investigate the time taken until reaching end-tidal levels above 85%. A comparison between the time taken to achieve end-tidal levels above 80% will be done between the different methods of pre-oxygenation as well as the different flow rates.
After 3 minutes of preoxygenation
Continuous comparison of end-tidal oxygen levels
Time Frame: After 3 minutes of preoxygenation
Evaluation of end-tidal oxygen levels will be done after one, two, three and four minutes of pre-oxygenation. Comparison between the different methods and flow rates of pre-oxygenation will be done in order to evaluate which method and flow rate generates adequate end-tidal oxygen levels most quickly.
After 3 minutes of preoxygenation
Pre-oxygenation with open and closed mouth
Time Frame: After 3 minutes of preoxygenation
All volunteers will be pre-oxygenated with both open and closed mouths in order to evaluate if there are any differences in end-tidal oxygen levels when breathing with open or closed mouth.
After 3 minutes of preoxygenation
Vital capacity breathing vs tidal volume breathing
Time Frame: After 3 minutes of preoxygenation
End-tidal oxygen levels during pre-oxygenation will be evaluated and compared between tidal volume breathing for three minutes and eight vital capacity breaths.
After 3 minutes of preoxygenation
Differences in end-tidal oxygen levels after pre-oxygenation due to age, body mass index or sex.
Time Frame: After 3 minutes of preoxygenation
Subgroup analysis will be performed in order to investigate any differences in the effect of pre-oxygenation depending on volunteer age, body mass index or sex.
After 3 minutes of preoxygenation
Discomfort
Time Frame: After 3 minutes of preoxygenation
Level of discomfort, on a scale between one and ten, where ten is the worst discomfort and 0 is the best comfort) will be compared between the three different methods of pre-oxygenation and the different flow rates.
After 3 minutes of preoxygenation

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety outcome
Time Frame: After 3 minutes of preoxygenation
Do more volunteers report problem with headache or nosebleed during pre-oxygenation with the standard nasal cannula compared to pre-oxygenation with facemask or humidified high-flow nasal oxygen?
After 3 minutes of preoxygenation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Malin Jonsson Fagerlund, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 2, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on Humidified high-flow nasal oxygen

3
Subscribe