Comparing NGENUITY vs Conventional Microscope in a New Hydrus User

April 10, 2025 updated by: Robert T. Chang, MD, Stanford University
To compare the potential efficiency and educational value of using NGENUITY (3D camera system, FDA approved for this indication) vs the conventional microscope for Hydrus microstent placement by new users.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94303
        • Byers Eye Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with mild to moderate primary open angle glaucoma as defined by AGS with visually significant age-related cataract undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery and Hydrus microstent
  • Either eye or both eyes may participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of patient cooperation severely affecting ability to place stent with any visualization technique
  • Angle abnormalities including PAS in nasal quadrant
  • Unable to properly visualize the angle due to complicated cataract surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NGENUITY
Research fellow participants utilize NGENUITY during micro-stent placement
Device for 3-D viewing during placement of micro-stent placement.
Active Comparator: Conventional microscope
Research fellow participants utilize conventional microscope during micro-stent placement
Device for stereoscopic viewing during placement of micro-stent placement.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time of First Cannula in Until Satisfactory Stent Placement and Cannula Out
Time Frame: up to 1 hour
up to 1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Trabecular Meshwork Piercing Attempts Needed to Place Stent
Time Frame: up to 1 hour
up to 1 hour
Number of Anterior Chamber Entry and Reentry Attempts During Stent Placement
Time Frame: up to 1 hour
up to 1 hour
Number of Microscope Focus or Position Readjustments Needed During Stent Placement
Time Frame: up to 1 hour
up to 1 hour
Change in Attending Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: Up to 5 minutes
Providers rate their comfort, visibility, image quality, focus, depth perception, staff engagement, teaching and level of confidence in using the system and system performance. Ratings are on a Likert scale of 1 to 5. Higher scores correspond to excellent ratings, higher confidence in using the system, and better system performance; for Scope Preference only, lower numbers (either group) correspond to a preference for NGenuity visualization.
Up to 5 minutes
Change in Fellow Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: Up to 5 minutes
Providers rate their comfort, visibility, image quality, focus, depth perception, staff engagement, teaching and level of confidence in using the system and system performance. Ratings are on a Likert scale of 1 to 5. Higher scores correspond to excellent ratings, higher confidence in using the system, and better system performance; for Scope Preference only, lower numbers (either group) correspond to a preference for NGenuity visualization.
Up to 5 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert T Chang, MD, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 13, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 22, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

March 22, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 66363

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glaucoma

Clinical Trials on NGENUITY

Subscribe