Effects of Thrust Versus Non-Thrust Thoracic Manipulation on Mechanical Neck Pain.

September 13, 2022 updated by: Foundation University Islamabad
Neck pain ranks as the 4th leading cause of disability, with high prevalence of mechanical neck pain in young population. As high as 30% of %. Individuals suffering from neck often report difficulty in performance of daily life, absence from work and decreased productivity. Several manual therapy treatment approaches are used for mechanical neck pain. The focus of this study is to compare the effectiveness of thrust and non-thrust thoracic manipulation for the treatment of mechanical neck pain in young population

Study Overview

Detailed Description

craniovertebral angle, cervical range of motion and pain will be noted for each participant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan, 46000
        • Foundation University College of Physical Therapy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 24 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Both genders
  • Age: 18-24 years
  • Symptoms <30 days
  • FABQPA score <12
  • Increased upper thoracic spine kyphosis (visual estimate)
  • CVA < 48 Degrees

Exclusion Criteria

  • Symptoms distal to shoulder
  • Aggravation of symptoms with looking up
  • Radiating lower back pain
  • Neurological deficit
  • Previous surgery
  • Spondylolisthesis
  • Spinal stenosis
  • Inflammatory disease
  • Vertebrobasilar artery insufficiency
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A (Thrust Manipulation)
Participants will be randomly allocated to Group A which will recieve Thrust manipulation treatment in addition to standard treatment protocol. Prone thoracic extension manipulation technique will be applied from T2 - T6 to participants for 4 sessions on alternate days
Prone thoracic extension manipulation technique will be applied from T2 - T6 to participants of Group A (Experimental group). Intervention will be applied on alternate days with a total of 4 treatment sessions

Standard treatment protocol includes moist heat, TENS and Post isometric relaxation technique. Standard treatment will be given to both groups on every session. Standard treatment consists of:

Superficial Moist Heat (Device): Superficial moist heat will me applied for 10 minutes on Upper Trapezius TENS (Device): TENS will be applied for 10 minutes at 80-100Hz, the electrodes will be placed at upper trapezius.

Post-isometric Relaxation (procedure/surgery): 5-10 repetions of Post Isometric relaxation technique will be applied on various muscle groups which include Upper trapezius, levator scapulae, sternocleidomastoid and scalenes.

Experimental: Group B (Non-Thrust Manipulation)
Participants will be randomly allocated to group B which, in addition to standard treatment protocol, will recieve Maitland grade III or IV manipulation from T1 to T6. Posterior to anterior glide over spinous process will be maintained for 30 seconds. Participants will recieve 4 sessions on alternate days

Standard treatment protocol includes moist heat, TENS and Post isometric relaxation technique. Standard treatment will be given to both groups on every session. Standard treatment consists of:

Superficial Moist Heat (Device): Superficial moist heat will me applied for 10 minutes on Upper Trapezius TENS (Device): TENS will be applied for 10 minutes at 80-100Hz, the electrodes will be placed at upper trapezius.

Post-isometric Relaxation (procedure/surgery): 5-10 repetions of Post Isometric relaxation technique will be applied on various muscle groups which include Upper trapezius, levator scapulae, sternocleidomastoid and scalenes.

Maitland grade III or IV thoracic 0manipulation will be given to participants of Control group from T1 to T6. Posterior to anterior glide over spinous process will be maintained for 30 seconds. Intervention will be applied on alternate days with a total of 4 treatment sessions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Craniovertebral Angle
Time Frame: 8 days
Craniovertebral Angle wll be measured using Goniometer. CVA >48 is considered normal, CVA <48 is considered as Forward head posture. Immovable arm of the goniometer will be placed at the C7 spinous process and the movable arm at the tragus of the ear making an angle between the two lines, normal of which is 49.9 and angle less than that is considered as abnormal. Data will be collected directly from participants using Gomiometer before initiation of treatment and after 4th session.
8 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cervical Range of Motion
Time Frame: 8 days
Cervical Range of motion will be measured using bubble inclinometer. Measurement will be taken before the initiation of treatment and after 4Th treatment session. Increase in Cervical ROM will be considered a positive outcome.
8 days
Pain intensity
Time Frame: 8 days
Pain will be assessed using Numeric pain rating scale which comprises of 11 points where point (0) signifies no pain and point (10) signifies worst imaginable pain. Measurement will be taken before the initiation of treatment and after 4Th treatment session. Low score for the NPRS will be considered a positive outcome.
8 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FUI/CTR/2022/15

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Thrust Manipulation

Subscribe