The Effectiveness of Manipulation Treatment in Cervical Region

September 22, 2023 updated by: Ramazan KURUL, Abant Izzet Baysal University

The Effectiveness of Manipulation Treatment in Acute Cervical Region Pain

Neck pain is the second most common musculoskeletal pain after lumbar pain. Prevalence is 27.2% female and 17.4% in male population (1, 2). Approximately 1/3 of acute onset neck aches become chronic. It causes increasing the cost of treatment and also the loss of labor (3, 4).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Acute neck pain is often caused by mechanical causes and can be classified as rheumatic diseases, infectious and tumoral pathologies, metabolic bone diseases such as osteoporosis and osteomalacia, pain reflected the cervical region. A-V malformation and syringomyelia are the causes of chronic cervical pain (5). Mechanical neck pain is a non-radicular pain caused by local musculoskeletal structures and is characterized by a spasm of the cervical muscles. (6, 7). Posture, emotional stress, cold and fatigue are etiologic causes, and pain is also reflected in the cervical, occipital and scapular regions depending on the severity of muscle spasm and the presence of trigger point in myofascial pain syndrome (9, 10). Many authors have suggested that facet joints are associated with mechanical dysfunction as a common cause of cervical pain (8-10).

The pain in the head and neck region affects the quality of life, cognitive and functional status of the person. The most important difficulty and failure in the treatment of such pain arise from the inability to diagnose the disease correctly. Good anatomical and biomechanical properties of the region, comprehensive anamnesis, physical examination under static and dynamic conditions, laboratory and radiological examinations are the most important milestones of diagnosis (12). In most cases, medical treatment and physical therapy modalities (superficial and deep heat, electrotherapy, laser, traction, massage, spa) are sufficient for pain relief and recovery of function, but interventional procedures and surgical procedures are needed for the fewer patient. Recently, spinal mobilization and manipulation techniques can be used to relieve pain and restore function in the early stages. Although it is a safe method, in order to prevent the rare complications it is necessary to determine the indications of treatment correctly, to exclude contiguous cases and to apply the manipulation by experts (12).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Merkez
      • Bolu, Merkez, Turkey, 14100
        • Abant Izzet Baysal University
      • Bolu, Merkez, Turkey, 14100
        • Health Sciences Faculty Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis Nonspecific neck pain (NSNP)
  • Symptoms should last longer than 2 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any known cause such as radiculopathy or neurological diseases,
  • History of neck surgery,
  • History of vertebral fracture,
  • Osteoporosis,
  • Tumor or a mass in the vertebral column,
  • Any spinal thrust manipulation contraindication,
  • Medication usage such as antiinflammatory or analgesic which might effect outcome assessments,
  • History of spinal manipulation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group
A single-session manipulation with a high-speed low-amplitude thrust technique in the cervicothoracic transition region will be applied each week for two weeks.
The patient will be positioned in a supine position with arms crossed over over the trunk and holding the shoulders. The therapist will place a stabilizing hand over transverse process of T1 in pistol grip and contacted patients elbow with sternum and patient will be asked do a hip bridge while taking a deep breath than exhale. Thrust manipulation will be applied at the end of exhale.
Sham Comparator: Control Group
A sham manipulation without a high-speed low-amplitude thrust technique in the cervicothoracic transition region will be applied.
The patient will be positioned in a supine position with arms crossed over over the trunk and holding the shoulders. The therapist will place a stabilizing hand over transverse process of T1 in pistol grip and contacted patients elbow with sternum and patient will be asked do a hip bridge while taking a deep breath than exhale. A soft compression will be applied at the end of exhale without a thrust.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain pressure threshold
Time Frame: two weeks
Pain pressure threshold (PPT). was assessed with an analogue algometry (Baseline, FEl Inc. White Plains, NY,USA) with 1 cm2 rubber tip was used to measure the pain pressure threshold. Algometer perpendicularly placed over spinous process of T1 on prone position and pressure progressively increased 1 kg/s until patients verbally reported pain under the tip of algometer or referring pain. Measurement repeated three times and average score recorded.
two weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analog scale
Time Frame: two weeks
The patient was asked to mark the severity of his or her pain with active motion on a horizontal line 100 millimeters in length. The intensity of the pain was calculated by measuring the area in which the individual marked between 0 (no pain) and 10 (the most severe pain I felt in my life).
two weeks
Neck Disability Index
Time Frame: two weeks
Perceived disability of patients was assessed with 10-item item Neck Disability Index (NDI),which a modified from Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index to assess with a score range of 0 to 50.
two weeks
Global Perceived Effect Scale
Time Frame: two weeks
Change in the perception of the symptoms after the treatment was measured by a Global Perceived Effect Scale. Patients were asked to rate change between 1 completely recovered, 4 unchanged, 7 vastly worse on a horizontal likert scale.
two weeks
Cervical range of motion
Time Frame: two weeks
Cervical Range of Motion (ROM) of flexion,extension, lateral flexion and rotation were measured with basic cervical ROM device (Performance Attainment, Associates, St Paul, MN, USA) in seated position without back support.
two weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Erdal Dilekçi, MD, Bolu Abant Izzet Baylsa University
  • Principal Investigator: Ramazan KURUL, Ph.D, Bolu Abant Izzet Baylsa University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 2, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 16, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AIBU-FTR-RK-04

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be shared after study publicaiton with online link.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available after study published and will be available indefinetly.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

data will be accessed from cloud store link

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Cervicothoracic thrust manipulation

3
Subscribe