Characterization and Prediction of Early Onset Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (NeuroPredict)

June 27, 2024 updated by: Johan Bovbjerg Røikjer, Aalborg University Hospital

Characterization and Prediction of Early Onset Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (NeuroPredict)

Predicting early onset neuropathy in people with type 1 diabetes

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy is the most common complication to diabetes mellitus affecting as much as 50% of the population with diabetes. Symmetrical sensory neuropathy is by far the most common pattern, which often progress slowly over many years, although some individuals experience faster and more severe courses. Despite the frequent occurrence, the causes of diabetic peripheral neuropathy are largely unknown, which is reflected in the fact that no disease-modifying treatments are available for preventing, treating or even halting the progression of the disease. The consequences can be dire, as neuropathy frequently leads to foot ulcers, amputations or intolerable neuropathic pain in the lower extremities. Sensory loss may go completely undetected in diabetes, as there often are literally no symptoms. For many individuals, the development of diabetic peripheral neuropathy can therefore proceed completely unnoticed, making regular screening the most important tool for diagnosing the condition. Unfortunately, unlike nephropathy or retinopathy, diabetic peripheral neuropathy is not easily screened for, as the condition lacks reliable markers for early- or progressing disease. Therefore, screening for diabetic peripheral neuropathy currently revolves around diagnosing loss of protective sensation, judged by the inability to feel vibration or light touch. However, in their most recent guidelines, the American Diabetes Association has included screening for small fibre neuropathy using either the cold- and heat perception thresholds or pinprick as a clinical standard. Although this acknowledgement of the importance of assessing not only large- but also small nerve fibres is a huge step towards early detection of diabetic peripheral neuropathy, the overriding issue of insensitive, unreproducible, and inaccurate bedside tests for small nerve fibres remains. While cold- and heat perception and pinprick sensation are indeed mediated by small nerve fibres, the sensitivity of these methods, outside of extreme standardization only achievable in dedicated neuropathy research-centres, remain poor and not usable on an individual level. This lack of sensitivity has also become apparent in several large clinical trials, where the methods have continuously failed as robust clinical endpoints. Due to this, the hunt for a sensitive and reproducible method for adequate assessment of the small nerve fibres have begun. Amongst several interesting methods, two have gained particular interest (corneal confocal microscopy and skin biopsies with quantification of intra-epidermal nerve fibre density), due to their diverse strengths, although clinical application is currently limited to a few specialized sites. Furthermore, both methods suffer several inherent issues including that fact that they only provide information about the structure of the nerves and not the function.

In this study, we will therefore combine established gold standards for early detection of structural changes to small nerve fibres in diabetic peripheral neuropathy with cutting-edge, experimental techniques for measuring the function of the same nerve fibres. Furthermore, we will also evaluate several advanced technologies as an alternative to the current clinical standard for large fibre evaluation (biothesiometry).

Study objectives

  • To establish a prospective cohort for long-term follow-up for early detection of the development of diabetic peripheral neuropathy
  • To evaluate alternative methods for screening for diabetic peripheral neuropathy in a clinical setting
  • To evaluate measurements of small nerve fibre function against methods for small nerve fibre structure

Methods

A prospective, long-term, follow-up, cohort study running from 01.04.2022-31.12.2029. The study will consist of two different, yet aligned, sub-studies:

  1. An observational, cohort study consisting of a random sample of up to 1,000 persons with diabetes (any type) and neuropathy at any stage, entering the outpatient clinic at Steno Diabetes Center North Denmark/Department of Endocrinology, Aalborg University Hospital.
  2. A smaller, observational, cohort study consists of 100-200 persons with type 1 diabetes and no clinically detectable neuropathy.

The first study will aim to evaluate alternative screening methods to be used in clinical practice, while it will also be used to identify persons eligible to participate in the second study.

The second study will aim to preform deep-sensory phenotyping of people without established diabetic peripheral neuropathy using methods evaluating both structure and function of small nerve fibers. The cohort will be followed from inclusion and evaluated once yearly to see if they are progressing. Ultimately, this cohort will be used to retrospectively evaluate, if any, or a combination of, the used experimental methodology can predict, who develops diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and who doesn't.

Participants from either of the two studies will be informed about the trial and their expected outcomes both written and vocally. Participants will follow their usual clinical control for diabetes and complication-screening (including usual foot care and neuropathy screening), and the enhanced screening performed in this study will therefore be an addition to clinical standard. No interventions will be made.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Niels Ejskjaer, PhD
  • Phone Number: +45 +4597663656
  • Email: n.ejskjaer@rn.dk

Study Locations

      • Aalborg, Denmark, 9000
        • Recruiting
        • Aalborg University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Johan Røikjer, MD, PhD
          • Phone Number: +45 97666092

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Type 1 diabetes without established neuropathy with planned continuity of care at Steno Diabetes Center North Denmark, Aalborg

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women aged 18-80 years
  • Diagnosed with diabetes (of any type)
  • No clinically established diabetic peripheral neuropathy at inclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Alcohol or drug abuse within the last year (prior to inclusion)
  • Chemotherapy (prior or within study period) or experimental medicine
  • Severe vitamin deficiencies
  • Inability to understand or comply with the examinations
  • Planned or likely discontinuation of care at Aalborg University Hospital
  • Known hematologic disorders resulting in a markedly reduced ability to stop small bleedings
  • Severe limb ischemia
  • Active diabetic foot ulcers
  • Previous amputations
  • Severe skin diseases or diseases known to cause neural damage
  • Pregnancy at inclusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Type 1 diabetes without known peripheral neuropathy
People with type 1 diabetes without known peripheral neuropathy with "limited" diabetes duration
Heat and cold perception thresholds
Other Names:
  • Quantitative Sensory Testing
Skin biopsy
Other Names:
  • PGP9.5, antibodies for subsets of ion-channels ect
Transcutaneous stimulation of large and small nerve fibres using weak electrical currents
Other Names:
  • PTT
Corneal nerve fibre density, corneal nerve fibre length, corneal nerve branch density
Other Names:
  • CCM
Functional and structural MRI pictures of peripheral nerves and CNS
Other Names:
  • fMRI, DTI, neurography
Nerve conduction and amplitude of Sural nerve
Other Names:
  • NC-STAT DPNCheck
Composite scores and questionnaires
Other Names:
  • DN4, MNSI, NDS, NAFF

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prediction of early onset neuropathy
Time Frame: 1,3,5,7,9 years
Retrospective evaluation of the predictive power for each of the diagnostic tests
1,3,5,7,9 years
Comparison of Perception Threshold Tracking (PTT) and skin biopsies
Time Frame: 1-2 years
Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV of PTT compared to skin biopsies
1-2 years
Progression and regression of neuropathy
Time Frame: 1-9 years
Description of the natural history of the development of neuropathy
1-9 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Development and testing of single-use electrode for PTT
Time Frame: 5 years
As title states
5 years
Development and testing of new pulse shapes for PTT
Time Frame: 5 years
As title states
5 years
Correlation between central and peripheral measurements
Time Frame: 1-5 years
MRI-scans vs peripheral measurements
1-5 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stability of skin biopsies over time
Time Frame: 9 years
Repeated analysis of intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in skin biopsies frozen several years
9 years
fMRI as a marker for progression of neuropathy
Time Frame: 9 years
as title states
9 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Peter Vestergaard, PhD, Steno Diabetes Center North Denmark
  • Principal Investigator: Johan M Røikjer, PhD, Steno Diabetes Center North Denmark

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 1 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Thermal perception thresholds

Subscribe