Study of the Characteristics of Orthorexia Nervosa in the Population Living with Type 1 Diabetes (Santal-DT1)

October 7, 2024 updated by: Sylvain Iceta, Laval University

In the general population, the excessive and constant desire to control one's diet and body has become increasingly problematic. Indeed, the demand for control over one's diet and body is now an unspoken social prescription that can lead in some cases to eating disorders. In patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D), these concerns are even more central, as they are accentuated by the very nature of the treatment of the disease (dietary modification, insulin compensation according to food intake, etc.). Studies on adolescents with T1D show that the prevalence of eating disorders would be present in at least 1 in 5 patients. Among these disorders, orthorexia is of particular interest. Indeed, orthorexia was defined in 1997 by Steven Bratman as a rigid eating behavior based on the avoidance of foods considered qualitatively unhealthy. More precisely, orthorexia is characterized by a constant preoccupation with one's diet and persistent nutritional (or health) beliefs that take precedence over food pleasure. It has been estimated that the prevalence of orthorexia in patients living with T1D may be as high as 80%. We are currently conducting a study on the mechanisms of orthorexia in the general population of Quebec (the results of phase 1 of this study are being analyzed). We now wish to conduct the same study in a population with T1D, which has a higher prevalence of people with orthorexia nervosa.

The main objective of this study is to investigate the characteristics of orthorexia nervosa (obsessions and fixations on healthy eating) in the Quebec population with T1D from the BETTER Registry.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The BETTER registry is supervised by Dr. Rabasa-Lhoret and Dr. Brazeau and co-funded by CIHR and JDRF: more than 2000 patients with T1D are currently in the registry, of which 98% of the participants have agreed to be contacted for future research studies. This will be done by comparing food categorization strategies between control subjects from the previous study (results under analysis) and subjects with orthorexia nervosa traits in the T1D patient population, and also by testing the hypothesis of dysfunctions specific to the orthorexia population of executive functions (including attention, cognitive flexibility, inhibition and working memory) in the general domain and then more specifically in the food domain.

Considering the existing literature on orthorexia described above, and in particular the definition of orthorexia nervosa (orthorexia nervosa is defined as obsessions and fixations on healthy eating leading to negative emotional and behavioral consequences for the individual, e.g., excessive anxiety, social isolation), as well as the strong correlations observed in the literature between distress, anxiety, and diabetes, the hypotheses are the following:

  • Hypothesis 1: The more orthorexic traits subjects exhibit, the more quickly they categorize foods into healthy/unhealthy.
  • Hypothesis 2: The likelihood that a food, regardless of its properties, will be categorized as unhealthy is greater the more orthorexic traits the subjects exhibit.
  • Hypothesis 3: The more orthorexic traits subjects exhibit, the more stable they respond (i.e., they respond in the same way to each repetition of the same stimulus) when it comes to categorizing a food as good or bad for health.
  • Hypothesis 4: The more severe the orthorexia behaviors, the more distressing the patients will express about their T1D.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Québec, Canada
        • IUCPQ
      • Québec, Canada
        • Centre d'expertise Poids, Image et Alimentation (CEPIA)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This retrospective study will include data from people living with type I diabetes who participated in the baseline phase of the BETTER registry.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Person living with type 1 diabetes
  • French speaking
  • Between 18 and 35 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Forced food categorization task according to the categories "healthy / unhealthy"
Time Frame: Baseline

Instruction to the participant: "Classify the food that appears on your screen as quickly as possible, either as "healthy" (key E) or "unhealthy" (key I).

Each response and the associated reaction time will be recorded. Stimuli must be classified by the participant as quickly as possible, if the stimulus is not classified before 3 sec the participant moves to the next observation and the stimulus is recorded as NC (not classified).

Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gender
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Stroop Task
Time Frame: Baseline
Task aimed at evaluating the participant's inhibition and selective attention abilities.
Baseline
Trail Making Test (TMT)
Time Frame: Baseline
Task to assess the participant's cognitive flexibility.
Baseline
Age
Time Frame: Baseline
In years.
Baseline
Weight
Time Frame: Baseline
In kg.
Baseline
Height
Time Frame: Baseline
In meters.
Baseline
Diabetes Information : Age of appearance and duration
Time Frame: Baseline
In years.
Baseline
Diabetes Information : How insulin is administered
Time Frame: Baseline
Pumps or injections.
Baseline
Diabetes Information : Total dose of insulin
Time Frame: Baseline
For one day.
Baseline
Diabetes Information : Duration of diabetes self-monitoring
Time Frame: Baseline
Number of years or months of its use, either self-monitoring with capillary glucose tests or CGMS, if so.
Baseline
Diabetes Information : Severe hypoglycemic episodes
Time Frame: Baseline
Number of severe hypoglycemic episodes over the last year.
Baseline
Diabetes Information : Diabetes complications
Time Frame: Baseline
Number and type of diabetes complications.
Baseline
Eating Habit Questionnaire (EHQ)
Time Frame: Baseline

Questionnaires for the detection of orthorexic traits.

Individual subscale and total scale scores are summed, with higher scores indicating increased orthorexia nervosa tendencies.

The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 48.

Baseline
Ortho-15 Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline

Questionnaires for the detection of orthorexic traits.

The total score is obtained by adding the scores on each item. A low score on this tool indicates orthorexic tendencies.

The minimum score is 16 and the maximum is 39.

Baseline
Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q)
Time Frame: Baseline

Questionnaire for the detection of eating disorders.

The EDE-Q generates two types of data: frequency data on key behavioural features of eating disorders in terms of number of episodes of the behaviour, and subscale scores reflecting the severity of characteristics of eating disorders.Higher scores on the global scale and subscales denote more problematic eating behaviours and attitudes.

The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 6 for the subscales and the overall scale.

Baseline
Type 1 Diabetes Distress Scale (T1-DDS)
Time Frame: Baseline

Questionnaire for the assessment of type 1 diabetes distress.

The scale yields an overall distress score based on average responses along the 1-6 scale for all 28 items (range = 1-6).

The scale also yields a score for each of 7 subscales based on the average response on all of the items in that subscale (range = 1-6).

The higher the score, the higher the distress.

Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sylvain Iceta, MD, PhD, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec (IUCPQ)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 1 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on No intervention

Subscribe