TACE Combined With Lenvatinib and MWA in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma

September 23, 2022 updated by: Huang Jinhua, Sun Yat-sen University

Prospective Single Arm Phase II Study of TACE Combined With Lenvatinib and MWA After Down-stage in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma

To explore the objective effectiveness and safety of TACE combined with Lenvatinib in the treatment of advanced liver cancer. After successful down-stage, radical microwave ablation was further performed.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to explore the objective effective rate of TACE combined with Lenvatinib in the treatment of locally advanced liver cancer, so as to provide a new idea for the radical microwave ablation treatment mode after the decline of locally advanced liver cancer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

46

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
        • Recruiting
        • Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18-75 years with hepatocellular carcinoma have an expected survival of at least 3 months;
  • Number of tumors ≤ 3;
  • Large hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor diameter ≥ 7 cm;
  • Patients without inferior vena cava tumor thrombus, portal vein tumor thrombus and cholangiocarcinoma thrombus;
  • Although there is arteriovenous fistula or arterioportal fistula, it can be completely blocked;
  • Child Pugh grade A or B of liver function; ECoG physical fitness score < 2;
  • No bleeding tendency, normal coagulation function or coagulation dysfunction can be corrected after treatment;
  • Leukocyte count ≥ 3.0 × 109/L;
  • Hemoglobin ≥ 8.5g/dl;
  • Platelet count ≥ 50 × 109/L;
  • The international normalized ratio of prothrombin time (INR) ≤ 2.3 or prothrombin time (PT) does not exceed the upper limit of normal control for 3 seconds;
  • Serum creatinine was less than 1.5 times of the upper limit of normal;
  • Patients and / or family members agree to join the clinical trial and sign the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diffuse hepatocellular carcinoma;
  • Portal vein tumor thrombus;
  • Combined with tumor thrombus of hepatic vein and inferior vena cava;
  • Patients with lymph node metastasis and extrahepatic distant metastasis;
  • The liver function was classified as child Pugh C and could not be improved by liver protection treatment;
  • Arteriovenous fistula or arterioportal fistula with ineffective intervention;
  • Uncorrectable coagulation dysfunction and obvious hemogram abnormalities, with obvious bleeding tendency;
  • Intractable massive ascites;
  • ECoG physical fitness score > 2 points;
  • Combined with active infection, especially bile duct inflammation;
  • Serious heart, lung, kidney, brain and other important organ diseases;
  • Note: see attached table 1 for child Pugh classification of liver function; See attached table 2 for ECoG physical fitness score

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TACE combined with Lenvatinib
Three days after the first TACE treatment, when the liver function was evaluated as grade A / B, Lenvatinib was taken orally, 8mg / day (body weight less than 60kg) or 12mg / day (body weight equal to or more than 60kg).
Three days after the first TACE treatment, when the liver function was evaluated as grade A / B, Lenvatinib was taken orally, 8mg / day (body weight less than 60kg) or 12mg / day (body weight equal to or more than 60kg). Lenvatinib reduction standard: 8mg / day; 4mg / day; 4mg, the next day.
Other Names:
  • lenvima

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Down stage rate
Time Frame: 4 months
if the patient achieve any of these three criteria: ① the patient was downgraded from BCLC stage C to BCLC stage B (portal branch tumor thrombus was inactive, the focus was less than or equal to 7cm; or the focus did not invade the surrounding tissue after shrinking) or Milan standard (single tumor diameter was not more than 5cm or less than or equal to 3 tumors, and the maximum diameter was not more than 3cm, without vascular invasion). ② Liver function reaches child Pugh grade A or B; ③ The patient is in good health and can tolerate ablation.
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
RFS
Time Frame: 3 years
Recurrence free survival indicates the length of time after MWA for a cancer ends that the patient survives without any signs or symptoms of HCC
3 years
Objective response rate
Time Frame: 3 years
Change of the tumor size according to the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) [see attached table 3], the efficacy is defined as CR (complete remission), PR (partial remission), SD (stable) and PD (Progress)
3 years
Changes of liver and kidney function
Time Frame: 3 years
Changes of liver and kidney function index from blood biochemistry compared to baseline
3 years
TACE frequency and ablation frequency
Time Frame: 3 years
To access the times and frequency of TACE and ablation
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Tumor

Clinical Trials on TACE combined with Lenvatinib

Subscribe