High Voltage VS Standard Voltage Radiofrequency in a Patient With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

December 31, 2024 updated by: Amani Hassan Abdel-Wahab, Assiut University

Efficacy of High Voltage VS Standard Voltage Radiofrequency on Unilateral Lower Limb Neuralgia in a Patient With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

Postoperative lumbar spine pain syndrome (FBSS) refers to patients who have undergone surgery for lumbar spine disease one or more times and still have intractable lumbosacral pain after surgery, with or without lower limb sensory and motor dysfunction. Pain is the main reason for reducing patients' quality of life. Hussain and Erdek believe that despite up to 3 months of postoperative intervention, pain may still exist. Since persistent pain seriously affects patients' daily life and work, optimizing the FBSS treatment plan and improving the quality of life of FBSS patients cannot be ignored. At present, the treatment methods for neuropathic pain radiated to the lower extremity after lumbar spine surgery mainly include oral drug therapy, nerve block, pulsed radio frequency (PRF) and spinal cord electrical stimulation, and other minimally invasive interventional methods. Still, there is no domestic or foreign treatment method is reported in the literature to be effective.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Selective nerve root PRF is an effective method for treating neuropathic pain, but its analgesic mechanism is still unclear. The traditional PRF adopts the standard 42 ℃ mode, but due to its low voltage (40 V), short duration (120 s), and limited intensity of action, the patient cannot get the best therapeutic effect. In recent years, high-voltage long-term PRF has been gradually applied to treating neuropathic pain such as postherpetic neuralgia, trigeminal neuralgia, and glossopharyngeal neuralgia, and achieved ideal results.

. Selective spinal nerve puncture under ultrasound and X-ray guidance: After the patient enters the operating room, the venous access is inserted, and the patient is placed in a prone position. ECG monitoring is given, and the patient's vital signs are continuously monitored. Routine sterilization and laying of sheets, puncture with an 20 G radiofrequency puncture needle under the guidance of ultrasound, repeated X-rays to confirm the position of the needle tip, when the needle tip reaches the target position, the X-ray front view will show that the needle tip of the puncture needle is located below the pedicle, and the lateral view shows The tip of the puncture needle is located at the posterior 1/2of the intervertebral foramen, then connect the radiofrequency treatment apparatus, perform sensory and motor tests, and perform sensory tests The pain in the corresponding innervated area is reproduced within 0.5 V and 50 Hz, and is consistent with the patient's original pain location; if >0.5 V does not induce pain in the original pain area, fine-tune the needle tip position and then perform the sensory test until 0.1 The needle tip position can be fixed when the patient's original pain can be induced within ~0.5 V. In the exercise test, muscle beats in the corresponding area were induced within 1.0 V and 2 Hz. After the test was successful, 1 ml of contrast agent will be injected, and the X-ray should show that the contrast agent spread along the nerve root and epidural space.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt, 71111
        • Assiut University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 56 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have a history of lumbar spine surgery without instrumentation. , have clear symptoms of lumbar nerve root irritation, and unilateral lower extremity symptoms, and the straight leg raising test is positive

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mechanical compression to nerve root
  • Spondylolisthesis, retrolithesis
  • Spondylodiscitis
  • Lumbar canal stenosis
  • Inflammatory low back pain
  • Coagulopathy
  • Local anesthetic allergy
  • Infection at the site of injection
  • Systemic infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: control (group S)
patients will be given standard PRF treatment: temperature 42 ℃, frequency 2 Hz, pulse width 20 ms, voltage 37-41 V, time 120 s.
patients will be given standard pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment: temperature 42 ℃, frequency 2 Hz, pulse width 20 ms, voltage 37-41 V, time 120 s.
Other Names:
  • control group
Experimental: group H
patients will be given high-voltage long-term PRF treatment: temperature 42 ℃, frequency 2 Hz, pulse width 20 ms, the voltage range of 50-90 V, At the beginning, the patient will feel a severe burning sensation in the original pain area, and slowly after the patient tolerates it. Increase the voltage and gradually increase to the maximum voltage that the patient can tolerate (up to 70-90 V) until the end of 900 s.
patients will be given standard pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment: temperature 42 ℃, frequency 2 Hz, pulse width 20 ms, voltage 50-90 V, At the beginning, the patient will feel a severe burning sensation in the original pain area, and slowly after the patient tolerates it. Increase the voltage and gradually increase to the maximum voltage that the patient can tolerate (up to 70-90 V) until the end of 900 s.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: assessing a change in Change ODI from Baseline at 6 months
assessing a change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
assessing a change in Change ODI from Baseline at 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amani H Abdel-wahab, MD, Assiut University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 3, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuralgia

Clinical Trials on standard pulsed radio frequency (PRF)

Subscribe