Growth, Allergy and Neurodevelopment in Infants on Hydrolysed Formula (GRANDIOSA)

December 11, 2023 updated by: Magnus Domellöf, Umeå University

GRANDIOSA - Growth, Allergy and Neurodevelopment in Infants on Hydrolysed Formula

Breastfeeding is the recommended diet for all infants during the first half of infancy and is associated with numerous health benefits. However, when breastfeeding is not possible, an infant formula is the only nutritive alternative. Formula-fed infants have a different growth pattern compared to breastfed infants. Studies have shown that the higher protein content in infant formula compared to breastmilk results in a more rapid weight gain and an increased risk of overweight and obesity in childhood. For this reason, both quantity and quality of protein in infant formulae have been optimized during the last decade, to better meet the needs of infants and to support growth close to that of breastfed infants.

Protein hydrolysis, a common modification of infant formulae, has originally been developed for treatment of cow's milk protein allergy. Certain hydrolysed formulae have been suggested to prevent atopic eczema when given to infants with a family history of allergic disease but as of yet, the allergy preventive effect in infants without increased risk of allergic disease has been little studied. Partially hydrolysed infant formulae have also been suggested to reduce common functional gastrointestinal symptoms in infants.

New protein hydrolysates are continually developed for use in infant formulae, with the aim of reducing allergenicity, while ensuring optimal growth and development of infants. It is important to study the effects on growth and health outcomes in infants who are fed formulae based on these newly developed hydrolysates as compared to those fed standard intact protein formulae or breastmilk.

The overall aims of the current study are to evaluate the effects of two new hydrolysates on growth, immunological biomarkers, neurodevelopment, protein metabolism and gut microbiota in a randomized, controlled clinical trial of healthy infants. In compliance with European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) regulations for novel infant formulas based on hydrolysed protein, the primary outcome is change in weight standard deviation score (SDS) from baseline until 5 months of age.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

312

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Malmö, Sweden, 20502
        • Recruiting
        • Department of clinical science, Preventive Paediatrics, Lund university
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pia Karlsland-Akeson, MD, PhD
      • Umeå, Sweden, 901 85
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Umeå University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Magnus Domellöf, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 3 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy infants born at term
  • Birth weight 2500 to 4500 gram
  • Either exclusive breast-feeding (reference group) or exclusive formula-feeding (intervention and control group)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspected or verified food allergy
  • Suspected or verified infant colic

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Study formula 1
Formula-fed intervention group randomised to one of two study formulae
Partially hydrolysed formula
Experimental: Study formula 2
Formula-fed intervention group randomised to one of two study formulae
Partially hydrolysed formula
No Intervention: Standard formula
Formula-fed control group randomised to standard formula
No Intervention: Breast feeding
Reference group with exclusively breast-fed infants

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weight
Time Frame: At 5 months of age
Primary outcome is weight Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at the end of the intervention.
At 5 months of age

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length.
Time Frame: At enrollment at 2 months of age and monthly during the intervention up to 5 months of age.
Growth pattern during the course of the intervention measured by length in centimeters and SDS.
At enrollment at 2 months of age and monthly during the intervention up to 5 months of age.
Head circumference.
Time Frame: At enrollment at 2 months of age and monthly during the intervention up to 5 months of age.
Growth pattern during the course of the intervention measured by head circumference in centimeters and SDS.
At enrollment at 2 months of age and monthly during the intervention up to 5 months of age.
Body composition
Time Frame: At 4 months of age
Assessing differences in body composition between study groups using fat percentage as measured by PeaPod (Pletysmography).
At 4 months of age
Gastrointestinal tolerance.
Time Frame: At enrollment at 2 months of age and during the intervention up to 5 months of age.
Gastrointestinal tolerance using diary for information about stool frequency and consistency (in four grades from diarrhea to hard stools) in combination with questionnaire filled in by the parents based on Rome IV criteria for functional gastrointestinal disorders.
At enrollment at 2 months of age and during the intervention up to 5 months of age.
Gastrointestinal immunology.
Time Frame: At enrollment at 2 months of age and during the intervention up to 5 months of age.
Markers of gastrointestinal immune activation using analysis of calprotectin, eosinophilic derived neurotoxin and secretory Immunoglobulin A (IgA) in fecal samples.
At enrollment at 2 months of age and during the intervention up to 5 months of age.
Eczema severity, parent report.
Time Frame: At enrollment at 2 months of age and during the intervention up to 5 months of age.
Parents will fill in the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) score monthly during the intervention.
At enrollment at 2 months of age and during the intervention up to 5 months of age.
Eczema severity, clinical assessment.
Time Frame: At enrollment at 2 months of age and during the intervention up to 5 months of age.
Excema severity is assessed at every study visit using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI).
At enrollment at 2 months of age and during the intervention up to 5 months of age.
Allergy.
Time Frame: At enrollment at 2 months of age and at the end of the intervention at 5 months of age.
Sensitization to cow's milk protein is assessed by Immunoglobulin E (IgE) in serum using ImmunoCap.
At enrollment at 2 months of age and at the end of the intervention at 5 months of age.
Immunologic activity.
Time Frame: At enrollment at 2 months of age and at the end of the intervention at 5 months of age.
Blood cytokine patterns using Luminex: Interleukin 2 (IL-2) as a marker of general T cell activity. Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) as a marker of Helper T cells type 1 (Th1) activity. Interleukin 4 (IL-4) as a marker of helper T cells type 2 (Th2) activity. Tumor growth factor beta type 1 (TGF-β1) as a marker of T cell regulatory activity. Interleukin 17 A (IL17-A) as a marker of helper T cell type 17 (Th17) activity. C reactive protein (CRP) in plasma as a marker of general inflammatory response.
At enrollment at 2 months of age and at the end of the intervention at 5 months of age.
Metabolic biomarkers in blood.
Time Frame: At enrollment at 2 months of age and at the end of the intervention at 5 months of age.
Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). Insulin. C-peptide. Leptin. Leptin-receptor.
At enrollment at 2 months of age and at the end of the intervention at 5 months of age.
Markers of protein metabolism.
Time Frame: At enrollment at 2 months of age and at the end of the intervention at 5 months of age.
Plasma amino acids. Blood urea nitrogen.
At enrollment at 2 months of age and at the end of the intervention at 5 months of age.
Microbiota
Time Frame: At enrollment at 2 months of age and during the intervention up to 5 months of age.
Composition and diversity of the gut microbiota analysed in fecal samples. Bacterial DNA will be extracted and the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene will be amplified. Sequencing of all samples takes place on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Based on the results, we will also use metagenomic or Nanopore sequencing for deeper characterization of microbial composition and functions.
At enrollment at 2 months of age and during the intervention up to 5 months of age.
Neurodevelopment at 6 months of age.
Time Frame: At 6 months of age.
Response in cerebral blood flow to visual and auditory stimuli as measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).
At 6 months of age.
Neurodevelopment at 12 months of age.
Time Frame: At 12 months of age.
Bayely scales of infant development (BSID) 3rd edition. Higher score is interpreted as better outcome.
At 12 months of age.
Neurodevelopment at 3 years of age.
Time Frame: At 3 years of age
Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WIPPSI) 4th edition. Higher score is interpreted as better outcome.
At 3 years of age

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Magnus Domellöf, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Umeå University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 3, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infant Formula

Clinical Trials on Partially hydrolysed formula

Subscribe