An Investigation of the Effect of Types of Catheters on Bloodstream Infection in Patients With Major Burns: Prediction With Procalcitonin and Prognosis

October 12, 2022 updated by: Murat Ali ÇINAR, Hasan Kalyoncu University
Bloodstream infections and catheter-related infections frequently occur in burn patients. It is important to correctly assess and manage these infections. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of catheter types used in major burn patients on bloodstream infections as well as to predict sepsis status and manage its prognosis using a procalcitonin biomarker.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aim:

Bloodstream infections and catheter-related infections frequently occur in burn patients. It is important to correctly assess and manage these infections. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of catheter types used in major burn patients on bloodstream infections as well as to predict sepsis status and manage its prognosis using a procalcitonin biomarker.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 34 patients admitted to the intensive care unit of the Burn Center, December 25th State Hospital, Ministry of Health, between 2019 and 2022, were included in the study conducted at the Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hasan Kalyoncu University.

Study inclusion criteria

  • Conscious and cooperative (based on the Glasgow coma score; eyes open spontaneously (E): 4, obeys commands (M): 6, oriented verbal (V) response: 5; and E4M6V5);
  • Enterally fed, aged over 18 years;
  • No antibiotic treatment from hospitalization to discharge;
  • Meets the major burn class standards defined by the American Burn Association; and
  • Stable hemodynamic values and vital signs with no need for inotropic medication.

Study exclusion criteria

  • Organ dysfunctions or multiple organ failures
  • Antibiotics treatment Nutrient types and diets were the same in all groups. All patients received similar standard medical care and treatment from the time of emergency admission and acute care of the burn injury until the time of discharge. In addition, types and numbers of clinical interventions, such as surgical debridement and grafting, were similar in all groups. All patients who were included in this study were assessed for four weeks from the first day of hospitalization and taken to the treatment program.

Patients included in the study were divided into two groups based on whether they used PVCs or CVCs. Patients' procalcitonin, thrombocyte, and leukocyte levels were assessed every other day for 4 weeks, beginning on the first day they were admitted to the burn center. The above examinations at the Laboratories of the December 25th State Hospital, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Turkey, were retrieved retrospectively from the hospital database.

.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gaziantep, Turkey, 27000
        • Hasan Kalyoncu University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 81 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Conscious and cooperative (based on the Glasgow coma score; eyes open spontaneously (E): 4, obeys commands (M): 6, oriented verbal (V) response: 5; and E4M6V5);
  • Enterally fed, aged over 18 years;
  • No antibiotic treatment from hospitalization to discharge;
  • Meets the major burn class standards defined by the American Burn Association; and
  • Stable hemodynamic values and vital signs with no need for inotropic medication.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Organ dysfunctions or multiple organ failures • Antibiotics treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: patients who use peripheral venous catheters
Patients' procalcitonin, thrombocyte, and leukocyte levels were assessed every other day for 4 weeks, beginning on the first day they were admitted to the burn center. The above examinations at the Laboratories of the December 25th State Hospital, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Turkey, were retrieved retrospectively from the hospital database
This patients who were included in this study were assessed for four weeks from the first day of hospitalization and taken to the treatment program. All patients who use peripheral venous catheters in this group.
Experimental: patients who use venous catheters
Patients' procalcitonin, thrombocyte, and leukocyte levels were assessed every other day for 4 weeks, beginning on the first day they were admitted to the burn center. The above examinations at the Laboratories of the December 25th State Hospital, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Turkey, were retrieved retrospectively from the hospital database
This patients who were included in this study were assessed for four weeks from the first day of hospitalization and taken to the treatment program. All patients who use peripheral venous catheters in this group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level of procalcitonin
Time Frame: Each participant will be evaluated for 4 weeks
blood test
Each participant will be evaluated for 4 weeks
Level of thrombocyte
Time Frame: Each participant will be evaluated for 4 weeks
blood test
Each participant will be evaluated for 4 weeks
Level of leukocyte
Time Frame: Each participant will be evaluated for 4 weeks
blood test
Each participant will be evaluated for 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: MURAT A ÇINAR, DR, Study Principal Investigator

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burns

Subscribe