Articaine 4% Versus Lidocaine 2% for Local Anesthesia of MIH-affected Maxillary Molars

May 1, 2023 updated by: Tishreen University

Comparative Study of Articaine 4% Versus Lidocaine 2% in Local Anesthesia and Permanent Maxillary First Molars Affected by MIH.

Comparison of injection pain with lidocaine and articaine. Comparison of the efficacy of lidocaine and articaine during treatment of MIH- maxillary molars.

Design: A randomized, controlled, crossover, Triple-blinding clinical study including twenty six cooperative children, aged 6-12years old

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Background and Aims: Some dentists have difficulty obtaining effective anesthesia when treating MIH molars.

There are no studies comparing the effectiveness of lidocaine and articaine in MIH-maxillary molars.

Design: A randomized, controlled, crossover, Triple-blinding clinical study including twenty six cooperative children , aged 6-12 years old. Each child was randomly assigned to either articaine 4% or lidocaine 2% in their first session with the second solution being used at the second session.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 10 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Absolute positive or positive behavior according to the Frankel Scale.
  • child is not under the effect of any analgesics or sedatives and their weight was more than 20 kg.
  • Healthy, both physically and mentally
  • A child with a MIH-affected maxillary permanent first molar on the right and left sides .

Exclusion Criteria:

  • children who are uncooperative
  • allergic anesthetics used in the study
  • children who show inflammation in the injection site.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: A (Lidocaine 2%)
26 children will be injected with 1 ml of lidocaine 2% with epinephrine
The child will be injected with lidocaine 2%,after that the treatment will be completed , Pain during injection and treatment will be assessed using the FLACC scale and pain after injection and treatment will be evaluated using the Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale
Other Names:
  • A
Experimental: B (Articaine 4%)
26 children will be injected with 1 ml of Articaine 4% with epinephrine.
The child will be injected with 4% Articaine, after that the treatment will be completed , Pain during injection and treatment will be assessed using the FLACC scale and Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale
Other Names:
  • B

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
injection pain
Time Frame: during the injection of local anesthesia procedure
evaluated by outcome assessor using the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Behavioral Pain Rating Scale ( FLACC scale ) ( a behavioral pain assessment scale which has five criteria face, legs, activity, cry, consolability ,which are each assigned a score of 0, 1 or 2.Total score of scale is summed in range 0 to 10, where: 0=relaxed and comfortable; 1-3=mild discomfort; 4-6=moderate pain; 7-10=severe pain)..
during the injection of local anesthesia procedure
injection pain
Time Frame: Immediately after the injection of local anesthesia procedure
self assessment pain by the children using Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale (a scale shows a series of faces ranging from a happy face at 0, or "no hurt", to a crying face at 10,which represents "hurts like the worst pain imaginable" )
Immediately after the injection of local anesthesia procedure
dental pain
Time Frame: during procedure
evaluated by outcome assessor using the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Behavioral Pain Rating Scale ( FLACC scale ) ( a behavioral pain assessment scale which has five criteria face, legs, activity, cry, consolability ,which are each assigned a score of 0, 1 or 2.Total score of scale is summed in range 0 to 10, where: 0=relaxed and comfortable; 1-3=mild discomfort; 4-6=moderate pain; 7-10=severe pain)..
during procedure
dental pain
Time Frame: Immediately after treatment procedure
self assessment pain by the children using Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale (a scale shows a series of faces ranging from a happy face at 0, or "no hurt", to a crying face at 10,which represents "hurts like the worst pain imaginable" )
Immediately after treatment procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mai Haidar, Dr, Tishreen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 17, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 5, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation

Clinical Trials on Lidocaine 2%

3
Subscribe