Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis vs Dry Needling in Myofascial Pain Syndrome of Shoulder Pain

May 23, 2023 updated by: Roberto Méndez Sánchez, University of Salamanca

Comparative Study of the Effects of Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis vs. Dry Needling in the Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome in Subjects With Non-specific Shoulder Pain

This is a parallel-group randomised clinical trial:

Primary purpose: To analyse the clinical changes produced by two different physiotherapy treatments (Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis and Dry Needling) for myofascial trigger points in the infraspinatus muscle in subjects with non-specific shoulder pain.

Hypothesis: A physiotherapy treatment including Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis therapy present greater benefits in terms of pain reduction and increased mobility and functionality rather than Dry Needling treatment in subjects with non-specific shoulder pain.

The intervention consisted of 3 treatment sessions, different according to the group, once a week. Seven evaluation points were performed, two pre-intervention evaluations one week apart and after the second one the first treatment session was performed. The third and fourth assessments were prior to the second and third treatment sessions, one week apart. The fifth, sixth and seventh assessments were conducted one week, one month and two months after the last treatment session in each group.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Roberto Méndez-Sánchez, PhD
  • Phone Number: 3201 +34 923294500
  • Email: ro_mendez@usal.es

Study Locations

      • Salamanca, Spain, 37007
        • Recruiting
        • University of Salamanca
        • Contact:
          • Roberto Méndez-Sánchez, PhD
          • Phone Number: 3201 +34 923294400
          • Email: ro_mendez@usal.es

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 51 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Both male and female patients suffering from shoulder pain during at least three months before intervention protocol starts.
  • Patients with free passive range of movement and at least 15 degrees active external rotation in the affected shoulder.
  • Patients willing to participate in the study and return for all scheduled follow-up visits.
  • Patient is capable of giving, and has given, written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a previous medical diagnosis (tendon rupture, bursitis, etc.) or a traumatic history that justifies shoulder pain.
  • Patients with unstable or uncontrolled angina, uncontrolled heart failure, or serious uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias.
  • Patients allergic to metal or those who have needle phobia.
  • Patient that has participated in any other shoulder pain treatment research study within 30 days prior.
  • Patients that had prior shoulder surgery.
  • Patients that are currently being treated with a narcotic or NSAIDs and/or has used analgesics or NSAIDs within the 72 hours prior.
  • Patients that has a known bleeding disorder or that are currently being treated with anticoagulant therapy.
  • Pregnant women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Group (Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis Group)

The treatment to be performed in the Intratissue percutaneus electrolysis Group will consist of:

  1. Palpation and localization of the myofascial trigger points in the infraspinatus muscle of the affected shoulder.
  2. Application of the ultrasound-guided intratissue percutaneus electroysis technique (1 or 2 approaches) on the myofascial trigger points with the greatest clinical manifestations for the subject. The needle will remain at intramuscular level without movement and a galvanic current discharge will be applied in the area, through the needle, whose intensity will oscillate between 0.5 and 3 milliAmperes (mA).
  3. Performance of an eccentric work protocol of the infraspinatus muscle to reduce post-puncture pain.
Each subject will undergo 3 treatment sessions spaced one week apart. Ultrasound-guided Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis in the myofascial trigger points of the infraspinatus muscle
Active Comparator: Active Control Group (Dry Needling Group)

The treatment to be performed in the Dry Needling Group will consist of:

  1. palpation and localization of myofascial trigger points in the infraspinatus muscle of the affected shoulder.
  2. Application of the ultrasound-guided dry needling technique (1 or 2 approaches) on the myofascial trigger points with major clinical manifestations for the subject. The physiotherapist will move the needle into the muscle using Hong's rapid entry and exit technique.
  3. Performance of an eccentric work protocol of the infraspinatus muscle to reduce post-puncture pain.
Each subject will undergo 3 treatment sessions spaced one week apart. Ultrasound-guided dry needling in the myofascial trigger points of the infraspinatus muscle

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Pain intensity, before, during and after the intervention
Time Frame: 4 months (7 points)
Numerical pain rating scale (score 0-10 points)
4 months (7 points)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Shoulder flexion range of motion, before, during and after the intervention
Time Frame: 4 months (7 points)
The range of motion in flexion will be measured with an inclinometer to assess changes in the mobility to shoulder pain subjects
4 months (7 points)
Changes in Shoulder external rotation range of motion, before, during and after the intervention
Time Frame: 4 months (7 points)
The range of motion in external rotation will be measured with an inclinometer to assess changes in the mobility to shoulder pain subjects
4 months (7 points)
Changes in Pressure pain threshold at proximal myofascial trigger point of the infraspinatus muscle, before, during and after the intervention
Time Frame: 4 months (7 points)
The pressure threshold will be recorded using a digital algometer.
4 months (7 points)
Changes in Pressure pain threshold at distal myofascial trigger point of the infraspinatus muscle, before, during and after the intervention
Time Frame: 4 months (7 points)
The pressure threshold will be recorded using a digital algometer (Pain Test™ FPIX 10)
4 months (7 points)
Changes in Strength in shoulder external rotation before, during and after the intervention
Time Frame: 4 months (7 points)
The strength will be recorded with wireless MicroFET 2: Hand-held dynamometer for force assessment.
4 months (7 points)
Changes in Hand grip strength, before, during and after the intervention
Time Frame: 4 months (7 points)
The strength will be recorded with Jamar Plus: Digital dynamometer to assess grip strength.
4 months (7 points)
Changes in Disability and functionality of the upper limb, before, during and after the intervention
Time Frame: 4 months (7 points)
To measure the upper limb disability and functionality we will use the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), which is a validated questionnaire that measures the functionality and disability that shoulder pain generates in the subject.
4 months (7 points)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Roberto Méndez-Sánchez, University of Salamanca

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 8, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shoulder Pain

Clinical Trials on Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis

Subscribe