Intracoronary Cryotherapy Effect on Stabilization of Vulnerable Plaque in Patients With (N)STEMI or Unstable Angina (POLARSTAR)

March 20, 2026 updated by: Cryotherapeutics SA

Clinical Investigation of Intracoronary Cryotherapy Using the CryoTherapy System (CTS) for High-risk Plaque in Patients With (Non-)ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) or Unstable Angina

The POLARSTAR study is an early safety and feasibility study to evaluate the performance and safety of the CryoTherapy System (CTS) for the treatment of coronary plaque lesions that are not obstructing blood flow but are at high-risk of rupture which would cause a major heart attack. The CTS is used to apply local freezing of the lesion using a balloon catheter, controlled by a console that regulates in- and outflow of a cooling agent into the catheter. The treatment is expected to stabilize the lesion, diminishing the risk of rupture. The study will enrol subjects with acute coronary disease who have suitable coronary lesions. Subjects will be followed for 1 year after the CTS treatment. Baseline identification of lesions will be done using Coronary CT-angiography (CCTA), which will be repeated at 3 and 9 months after procedure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The POLARSTAR study is an early feasibility study to evaluate the safety and performance of the CryoTherapy System (CTS) medical device, consisting of a console and a balloon catheter. The CTS is designed to deliver local cryo-energy to vulnerable plaque lesions in the coronary arteries, aiming to stabilize the plaque to reduce the risk of rupture and subsequent cardiac events. The study will enrol up to 10 subjects with NSTEMI or unstable angina, who underwent successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) of their culprit coronary lesion, and who were identified to have presence of at least 1 non-culprit suitable plaque lesion at high-risk of rupture. After providing informed consent the subjects will undergo a Coronary CT-angiography (CCTA) to confirm suitability of the coronary plaque lesion. A single high-risk plaque lesion will be treated by the investigators, with Intra-vascular Ultrasound (IVUS) imaging prior to and after CTS treatment. Subjects will be followed clinically for up to one year after the CTS treatment, and will have follow-up CCTA assessments at 3 and 9 months post-procedure. Primary endpoint will be Major cardiac events rate at 3 months post procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tbilisi, Georgia, 0186
        • Tbilisi Heart Center
      • Tbilisi, Georgia, 0112
        • Israeli-Georgian Research Clinic Helsicore
      • Kaunas, Lithuania, LT-50161
        • Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos
      • Klaipèda, Lithuania, LT-92288
        • Klaipeda university hospital
      • Vilnius, Lithuania, LT-08661
        • Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is at least 18 years old.
  2. Subject has acute cardiac pain/angina consistent with acute coronary syndrome eligible for coronary angiography meeting one of the following criteria:

    1. (Non-)ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction ((N)STEMI) with rise/fall of cardiac enzymes (troponin I or T) with at least one value above the 99th percentile of the upper reference limit requiring PCI within 72 hours from diagnosis
    2. Unstable angina
  3. Successful PCI (defined as diameter stenosis less than 30% and TIMI 3 flow on final angiography without procedural complication) of the culprit lesion.
  4. Subject has at least one high-risk plaque meeting the criteria below:

    1. Located in a non-culprit vessel,
    2. High-risk plaque lesion on CCTA and at least one of the following features:

      1. Presence of low-attenuation plaque (HU<50) and/or
      2. Positive remodelling (remodelling index >1.1) and/or
      3. Napkin ring sign and/or
      4. Plaque burden ≥70%
    3. Lesion length ≤ 20 mm.
    4. Diameter stenosis on invasive angiography between 30% and 70% on coronary angiogram or negative physiology assessment (FFR>0.80 or non-hyperemic pressure ratios (NHPR) >0.89).
    5. Reference vessel diameter (RVD) < 3.75 mm and > 2.00 mm in diameter
    6. Investigator considers that lesions are accessible.
    7. If more than two suitable lesions available, investigator will select the most appropriate lesion for cryotherapy treatment.
  5. Subject is able to provide consent and has signed and dated the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is hemodynamically unstable (cardiogenic shock, hypotension needing inotropes, hypoxia needing intubation, refractory ventricular arrhythmias, and IABP).
  2. Subject has ongoing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
  3. Subject had a procedural complication during the Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) PCI procedure.
  4. Subject has history of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) or planned CABG within 12 months after the index procedure.
  5. Subject has known reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction < 30%.
  6. Subject has known severe valvular heart disease.
  7. Subject has known severe renal insufficiency (eGFR <30 ml/min/1.72 m2).
  8. Subject has any life-threatening conditions or medical comorbidity resulting in life expectancy < 12 months.
  9. Subject is currently participating in another clinical investigation that has not yet reached its primary endpoint.
  10. Subject is pregnant or lactating, or NOT surgically sterile (tubal ligation or hysterectomy) or NOT postmenopausal for at least 6 months or is a female with childbearing potential without effective contraception (pill, patch, ring, diaphragm, implant and intrauterine device).

Angiographic exclusion criteria:

  1. Visible distal embolization/no-reflow following culprit lesions PCI.
  2. Left main coronary artery disease (visual diameter stenosis > 50%).
  3. Stent thrombosis/restenosis as a culprit lesion.
  4. CTS lesion involving a bifurcation (defined as lesions involving side branches >2.0 mm).
  5. Angiographic or CCTA evidence of severe calcification and/or marked tortuosity of the index vessel and/or lesion.
  6. Thrombotic lesions
  7. Ostial lesions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CTS Treatment Arm
active cryotherapy of a single suitable high-risk coronary plaque lesion with CTS device
local cryotherapy of coronary high-risk plaque lesions using the CTS consisting of a semi-compliant balloon and a console controlling the temperature of cryotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety: Rate of Cryotherapy related adverse events
Time Frame: 90 days post-procedure
Any cryotherapy procedure related complication defined as coronary artery dissection (angiographic dissection ≥ NHLBI type B), acute vessel closure, life threatening arrythmia, need for bailout stenting, or any Major Adverse Cardia Event (MACE) defined as cardiac death, CTS-treated vessel myocardial infarction, CTS-treated lesion revascularization, rehospitalization for unstable or progressive angina adjudicated to the CTS-treated lesion
90 days post-procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety: Rate of Cryotherapy related events
Time Frame: 1 year post-procedure
Any cryotherapy procedure related complication defined as coronary artery dissection (angiographic dissection ≥ NHLBI type B), acute vessel closure, life threatening arrythmia, need for bailout stenting, or any MACE defined as cardiac death, CTS-treated vessel myocardial infarction, CTS-treated lesion revascularization, rehospitalization for unstable or progressive angina adjudicated to the CTS-treated lesion
1 year post-procedure
Device success
Time Frame: end of CTS treatment
Number of lesions successfully treated without device deficiency
end of CTS treatment
CTS procedure success
Time Frame: end of CTS treatment
Number of lesions successfully treated to obtain Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow
end of CTS treatment
Imaging: CCTA assessed Minimum lumen area (MLA)
Time Frame: 90 days post-procedure
Change in MLA (mm²) compared to baseline
90 days post-procedure
Imaging: CCTA assessed Minimum lumen area (MLA)
Time Frame: 9 months post-procedure
Change in MLA (mm²) compared to baseline
9 months post-procedure
Imaging: CCTA assessed area stenosis
Time Frame: 3 months post-procedure
Change in area stenosis % compared to baseline
3 months post-procedure
Imaging: CCTA assessed area stenosis
Time Frame: 9 months post-procedure
Change in area stenosis % compared to baseline
9 months post-procedure
Imaging: CCTA assessed lesion plaque burden
Time Frame: 3 months post-procedure
Change in lesion plaque burden % from baseline
3 months post-procedure
Imaging: CCTA assessed lesion plaque burden
Time Frame: 9 months post-procedure
Change in lesion plaque burden from baseline
9 months post-procedure
Imaging: CCTA assessed Total plaque volume
Time Frame: 3 months post-procedure
Change in total plaque volume (mm³) from baseline
3 months post-procedure
Imaging: CCTA assessed Total plaque volume
Time Frame: 9 months post-procedure
Change in total plaque volume(mm³) from baseline
9 months post-procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Irakli Gogorishvili, MD, Israeli_Georgian research Clinic Helsicore, Tbilisi, Georgia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 18, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Infarction

Clinical Trials on CryoTherapy System (CTS)

Subscribe