Hyperspectral Retinal Observations for the Cross-sectional Detection of Alzheimer's Disease

October 27, 2022 updated by: Mantis Photonics AB

Two devices will be tested in this research:

  1. Mantis Photonics' hyperspectral camera for non-invasive retinal examination (i.e., a hardware medical device under investigation).
  2. Blekinge CoGNIT cognitive ability test (i.e., an assessment).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Worldwide, millions of people are affected by neurodegenerative diseases (e.g., Alzheimer's disease, dementia). Those diseases are having a tremendous socio-economic impact on our society. The cost associated with treating and caring for those diseases is enormous. Overwhelming evidence indicates how selective lifestyle changes (e.g., reducing exposure to known risk factors) can sometimes significantly decrease the probability of developing the disease or delay its onset. However, the diseases must be diagnosed early for them to be effective. There is a lack of accessible, inexpensive, and non-invasive practices that would allow for an early diagnosis of different diseases, even at the primary physician's office. Mantis Photonics and Blekinge Tekniska Högskola (Institustionen för Hälsa) aim to fill this urgent unmet medical need.

Strong indications of the possibility of classifying Alzheimer's status based on hyperspectral scans of the retina have been published by different researchers. These results were obtained based on images taken with hyperspectral cameras with a different working principle than the Mantis Photonics camera. The working principle of the Mantis Photonics camera allows making a hyperspectral retinoscopy with the same spectral range and comparable or better spectral resolution with a machine that is more modular and lower in cost. There is thus reason to hypothesize retinal scans taken with the Mantis Photonics camera can be used for the same classification task.

Previous studies on the automated tablet computer cognitive test CoGNIT have established validity, reliability and sensitivity for testing patients with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH) . Recently feasibility of testing in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) was affirmed (Behrens, Berglund, & Anderberg, CoGNIT Automated Tablet Computer Cognitive Testing in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment: Feasibility Study, 2022). In NPH patients, CoGNIT was more sensitive to cognitive impairment at baseline and cognitive improvement after shunt surgery than the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).

Blood tests for amyloid-β and other biomarkers related to Alzheimer's disease are being investigated for clinical practice, but the technique is not accepted as a standard test. Research has shown that renal function influences amyloid-β clearance from the body. Also, analytical errors influence test results. Therefore, one can question the influence of normal repeatability of the blood test result.

The aim of this investigation is the evaluation, (further) development and comparison of non-invasive techniques for the evaluation of patients suffering mild cognitive impairment, in particular, the Mantis Photonics hyperspectral camera with classification machine learning model in combination with the CoGNIT test of Dr Behrens (Blekinge Tekniska Högskola). These techniques will be compared to the result of cerebrospinal fluid analysis (CSF), the reference biological diagnostic technique for Alzheimer's disease.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Blekine Län
      • Karlskrona, Blekine Län, Sweden, 37141
    • Blekinge Län
      • Karlskrona, Blekinge Län, Sweden, 37141

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • subject age over 18 years old
  • The subject has undergone a lumbar puncture an cerebrospinal fluid analysis as part of the standard care.
  • The subject has at least one healthy eye.
  • The subject is applicable for taking a blood sample for the blood analysis test.
  • The informed consent is provided, explained and understood by the person. The person has consented to the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • There are contra-indications for lumbar puncture (eg: brain tumor with suspicion of raised intracranial pressure, coagulopathies or ongoing anticoagulant medications) will be excluded from the study.
  • When the subject suffers from excessive visual or auditive impairment, the he/she will be excluded from the CoGNIT track.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Subjects

On all subjects included in the study (see inclusion / exclusion criteria and informed consent) both procedures will be performed.

The result of these procedures (retinal scan, result from cognitive test and blood sample) will be used to build diagnostic classification models.

The Principal Investigator or a trained medical nurse (under the supervision of the principal investigator) will take an image of the retina of the patient with the Mantis Photonics hyperspectral retinoscopy camera.
Other Names:
  • eye-scan
  • fundus image (of the eye)
The Principle Investigator or a trained medical nurse (under the supervision of the Principal Investigator) will draw a small blood sample according to the standard medical procedures for drawing blood samples.
Other Names:
  • draw blood
The Principle Investigator or a trained medical nurse (under the supervision of the Principal Investigator) will give the patient to perform the digital cognitive test on a commercial tablet computer. The Principal Investigator or the medical nurse will be available for the patient to ask questions while the test is ongoing.
Other Names:
  • CoGNIT test
  • Cognitive test
  • Mental ability test

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy (Statistical metric) retinal image classification model
Time Frame: within 2 months after last patient procedure
Performance metric of the retinal image classification model: model accuracy [percent]
within 2 months after last patient procedure
Area under the Curve (statistical metrics) retinal image classification model
Time Frame: within 2 months after last patient procedure
Performance metric of the retinal image classification model: Area under the Curve (AuC) [0 < AuC < 1]
within 2 months after last patient procedure
Sensitivity (Statistical metric) retinal image classification model
Time Frame: within 2 months after last patient procedure
Performance metrics of the retinal image classification model: Sensitivity [percent]
within 2 months after last patient procedure
CoGNIT test diagnostic accuracy
Time Frame: within 2 months after last patient procedure
Accuracy [percent] of diagnosis based on the CoGNIT test data
within 2 months after last patient procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy: Metrics combination model
Time Frame: within 3 months after last patient procedure
A combination model of both non-invasive techniques will be evaluated based on the same metrics as the single-technique model (see primary objectives) and evaluated based on the comparison of said metrics: accuracy [percent] for the optimal choice of threshold.
within 3 months after last patient procedure
Area Under the Curve: Metrics combination model
Time Frame: within 3 months after last patient procedure
A combination model of both non-invasive techniques will be evaluated based on the same metrics as the single-technique model (see primary objectives) and evaluated based on the comparison of said metrics: Area Under the Curve [0<AUC<1] for the optimal choice of threshold.
within 3 months after last patient procedure
Sensitivity: Metrics combination model
Time Frame: within 3 months after last patient procedure
A combination model of both non-invasive techniques will be evaluated based on the same metrics as the single-technique model (see primary objectives) and evaluated based on the comparison of said metrics: sensitivity [percent] for the optimal choice of threshold.
within 3 months after last patient procedure
Non invasive test variability compared to reference
Time Frame: within 3 months after last patient procedure
The variability [relative and normalized: percent] between the first and the second hyperspectral retinoscopy result will be compared to the variability between the blood analysis at the first and the second appointment [relative and normalized: percent]. The blood test variability will be used as a reference in this study.
within 3 months after last patient procedure

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse effect
Time Frame: Immediately after the retinoscopy procedure

Measurement:

Percentage [percent] of patients who report adverse effects such as transient 'imprint' of the flash or other adverse effects.

Immediately after the retinoscopy procedure
Serious adverse effect
Time Frame: Immediately after the retinoscopy procedure

Occurence of serious adverse effects due to the procedure.

Any patient who suffers serious harm due to the procedure is a study outcome and a study endpoint.

Immediately after the retinoscopy procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anders Behrens, MD, PhD, Blekinge Tekniska Högskola

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 29, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 29, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MANTIS_2022_08_CrossSect_B
  • CIV-22-06-039726 (Other Identifier: Medical Products Agency of Sweden (Läkemedelsverket))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

No Individual Participant Data (IPD) sharing to third parties. Data of individual participants will be used for this study only.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on non-invasive hyperspectral retinoscopy

Subscribe