A Chronic Pain Master Protocol (CPMP): A Study of LY3857210 in Participants With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (NP05).

Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Clinical Trial to Evaluate LY3857210 for the Treatment of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain

This study is being done to test the safety and efficacy of the study drug LY3857210 for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. This trial is part of the chronic pain master protocol H0P-MC-CPMP (NCT05986292) which is a protocol to accelerate the development of new treatments for chronic pain.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Placebo; Drug: LY3857210

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 131
• Phase: Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Puerto Rico
  • Ponce, Puerto Rico, 00716
    • Ponce Medical School Foundation Inc.
  • San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00909
    • Latin Clinical Trial Center
• United States
  • Arizona
    • Chandler, Arizona, United States, 85224
      • Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc.
    • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85053
      • Arizona Research Center
  • California
    • Riverside, California, United States, 92503
      • Artemis Institute for Clinical Research
    • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
      • Artemis Institute for Clinical Research
  • Connecticut
    • Hamden, Connecticut, United States, 06517
      • CMR of Greater New Haven, LLC
  • Florida
    • DeLand, Florida, United States, 32720
      • Accel Research Sites- Clinical Research Unit
    • Miami, Florida, United States, 33165
      • New Horizon Research Center
    • Miami, Florida, United States, 33135
      • Suncoast Research Group
    • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
      • University of Miami Don Suffer Clinical Research Building
    • Ocala, Florida, United States, 34470
      • Renstar Medical Research
    • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32806
      • Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc - Orlando
    • Pinellas Park, Florida, United States, 33781
      • Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc.
  • Georgia
    • Woodstock, Georgia, United States, 30189
      • North Georgia Clinical Research
  • Idaho
    • Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States, 83404
      • Rocky Mountain Clinical Research
  • Illinois
    • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
      • Northwestern University
  • Massachusetts
    • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02131
      • Boston Clinical Trials
    • Methuen, Massachusetts, United States, 01844
      • ActivMed Practices and Research
    • Waltham, Massachusetts, United States, 02451
      • MedVadis Research Corporation
  • Michigan
    • Bay City, Michigan, United States, 48706
      • Great Lakes Research Group, Inc.
  • Missouri
    • Saint Peters, Missouri, United States, 63303
      • StudyMetrix Research
    • Springfield, Missouri, United States, 65807
      • Clinvest Headlands LLC
  • North Dakota
    • Fargo, North Dakota, United States, 58104
      • Lillestol Research
  • Ohio
    • Dayton, Ohio, United States, 45432
      • META Medical Research Institute
  • Pennsylvania
    • Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States, 16635
      • Altoona Center for Clinical Research
  • Texas
    • Austin, Texas, United States, 78731
      • FutureSearch Trials of Neurology
    • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
      • Synexus Clinical Research - St. Petersburg
  • Washington
    • Bellevue, Washington, United States, 98007
      • Northwest Clinical Research Center
    • Renton, Washington, United States, 98057
      • Rainier Clinical Research Center

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Have a visual analog scale (VAS) pain value greater than or equal to (≥) 40 and less than (<) 95 during screening.
• Have a history of daily pain for at least 12 weeks based on participant report or medical history.
• Have a body mass index <40 kilograms per meter squared (kg/m²) (inclusive).
• Are willing to maintain a consistent regimen of any ongoing nonpharmacologic pain-relieving therapies (for example, physical therapy) and will not start any new nonpharmacologic pain-relieving therapies during study participation.
• Are willing to discontinue all pain medications taken for chronic pain conditions for the duration of the study.
• Have daily symmetrical foot pain secondary to peripheral neuropathy present for at least 6 months and as diagnosed through use of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Part B ≥3 (©University of Michigan).
• Have a history and current diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.
• Have stable glycemic control as indicated by a glycated hemoglobin less than or equal to (≤) 11 at time of screening.
• Are men, or women able to abide by reproductive and contraceptive requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Have had a procedure within the past 6 months intended to produce permanent sensory loss in the target area of interest (for example, ablation techniques).
• Have surgery planned during the study for any reason, related or not to the disease state under evaluation.
• Have, in the judgment of the investigator, an acute, serious, or unstable medical condition or a history or presence of any other medical illness that would preclude study participation.
• Have substance use disorder as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th edition; DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association).
• Have had cancer within 2 years of baseline, except for cutaneous basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma resolved by excision.
• Have fibromyalgia.
• Are, in the judgment of the investigator, actively suicidal and therefore deemed to be at significant risk for suicide.
• Have a positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test result at screening.
• Have an intolerance to acetaminophen or paracetamol or any of its excipients.
• Have a history of alcohol, illicit drug, analgesic or narcotic use disorder within 2 years prior to screening.
• Have a current drug-induced neuropathy, for example, due to some types of chemotherapy, or other types of peripheral neuropathy.
• Have known hereditary motor, sensory or autonomic neuropathies.
• Have a seizure disorder, history of seizure (other than remote history of childhood febrile seizure), or a condition that would place the participant at increased risk of seizure, such as head injury (for example, skull fracture, cerebral contusion, concussion, or trauma resulting in prolonged. unconsciousness), intracranial neoplasm or hemorrhage.
• Are pregnant or breastfeeding.
• Have known or history of gastric or duodenal ulcers.
• Have known or history of inflammatory bowel disease (including ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease).

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo; Participants received placebo orally once daily for up to 8 weeks.	Drug: Placebo; Administered orally
Experimental: 45 mg LY3857210; Participants received 45 milligram (mg) of LY3857210 orally once daily for up to 8 weeks.	Drug: LY3857210; Administered orally

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity as Measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)	The NRS was used to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their average pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0=no pain, and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95 percent (%) credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.	Baseline, Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change From Baseline on the Sleep Scale From the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS Sleep Scale) - Average Hours of Sleep	The MOS Sleep Scale consists of 12 questions addressing the past week. Question 1 asks time to fall asleep and it is reported in 5-point timeframe categories. Question 2 asks average hours of sleep. In the remaining 10 questions participants report how often a sleep symptom or problem was present on a scale ranging from '0=all of the time' to '5=none of the time.' MOS Sleep scale dimension scores range from 0 to 100 with lower score indicating improvement, except for the dimension of sleep adequacy, where higher scores indicate improvement. Here, the average hours of sleep (i.e., Question 2) is reported as the average number of hours slept each night during the past week (range 0 to 24 hours). Higher number of hours slept indicates improvement. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.	Baseline, Week 8
Change From Baseline on the EuroQuality of Life Five Dimensions (5D) Five Level (5L) Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Health State Index (United States Algorithm)	The EQ-5D-5L assessed quality of life based on 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The participant was asked to 'check the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY,' choosing from 5 options (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems) provided under each dimension. The scores in the 5 dimensions were summarized into a health state index score using the United States algorithm. The health state index value is a single value on a scale from less than 0 to 1 (negative values are valued as worse than dead) with higher scores indicating better health: 0=a health state equivalent to death, and 1=perfect health. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible intervals was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.	Baseline, Week 8
Change From Baseline on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain	VAS was a graphic, single-item scale where participants were asked to describe their pain intensity over the past week, on a scale of 0 to 100: 0 = no pain, and 100 = worst imaginable pain. Participants completed the VAS by placing a line perpendicular to the VAS line at a point that described their pain intensity. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.	Baseline, Week 8
Change From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form Modified (BPI-SFM) Total Pain Interference Score	The BPI-SFM is a numeric rating scale that assesses the severity of pain (severity scale) and its impact on daily functioning (Pain Interference scale). BPI-SFM pain interference scale has been reported here. Pain interference scale has 7 items, including general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with others, sleep, and enjoyment of life each assessed on a 10-point scale. All the 7-items are averaged to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 10 where, 0=does not interfere to 10=completely interferes and the mean is reported here. Higher score represents worse outcome. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.	Baseline, Week 8
Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Intensity as Measured by NRS	The NRS was used to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their worst pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0 = no pain, and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.	Baseline, Week 8
Total Amount of Rescue Medication Use as Measured by Average Daily Dosage	Total amount of rescue medication use as measured by average daily dosage. Posterior mean and 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.	Week 8
Change From Baseline in Overall Improvement as Measured by Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)	Patient's global impression of change captured the participant's perspective of treatment apart from sub-aspects of the general improvement. This is a numeric scale from 1 to 7: 1 = very much better, and 7 = very much worse. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.	Baseline, Week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Eli Lilly and Company
• Investigators: Study Director: Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), Eli Lilly and Company

Publications and helpful links

Helpful Links

• A Chronic Pain Master Protocol (CPMP): A Study of LY3857210 in Participants With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (NP05)

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): November 14, 2022
• Primary Completion (Actual): July 19, 2023
• Study Completion (Actual): August 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: November 11, 2022
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 11, 2022
• First Posted (Actual): November 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): August 7, 2024
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 16, 2024
• Last Verified: July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Nervous System Diseases; Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Endocrine System Diseases; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Neuromuscular Diseases; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Neuralgia; Diabetic Neuropathies
• Other Study ID Numbers: 18340; H0P-MC-NP05 (Other Identifier: Eli Lilly and Company)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: YES
• IPD Plan Description: Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.
• IPD Sharing Time Frame: Data are available 6 months after the primary publication and approval of the indication studied in the US and European Union (EU), whichever is later. Data will be indefinitely available for requesting.
• IPD Sharing Access Criteria: A research proposal must be approved by an independent review panel and researchers must sign a data sharing agreement.
• IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type: STUDY_PROTOCOL; SAP; CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: Yes
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No