CSF Biomarkers in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

November 30, 2022 updated by: Ebrahim Ahmed Yousof Abdelhakeem, Assiut University

Value of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Biomarkers in Patients of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH) as an Indicative of Visual Affection and Treatment Modalities

Aim of the study is to high lighten the rule of CSF biomarkers in early diagnosis of IIH and in follow up to reach to a definite clinically based decision if this patient will improved on medical treatment or that patient is in need for surgical intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a rare disease of increasing incidence recently[1], owing to the rising curve of obesity and weight gain[2,3]. It is a disease of elevated intracranial pressure without known obvious aetiology. The reported incidence of IIH is 1 to 3 cases per 100,000 people of the general population[4]. IIH is diagnosed by exclusion; as patients come with continuous headache repeated vomiting , pulsatile tinnitus and the hall landmark of this disease, visual disturbance. One of the most deleterious effect of IIH is through its effect on optic nerve (papilledema) leading to visual field defect, horizontal double vision and finally decrease of visual acuity. Despite this, these presentations may not appears collectively and patient can come with one or two of vague symptoms as in IIH without papilledema variant[5]. So IIH needs an accurate, trusted, and rapid tool for diagnosis and follow up. Modified Dandy criteria[6,7] gives an informative description for IIH and a differentiation from other causes of increase intracranial pressure through; Signs and symptoms of increased intracranial pressure, Absence of localizing findings on neurologic examination, Absence of deformity, displacement, or obstruction of the ventricular system except for evidence of increased cerebrospinal fluid pressure (greater than 200 mm water)[8]. Normal neuroimaging except for empty sella turcica, optic nerve sheath with filled out CSF spaces, and smooth-walled non flow-related venous sinus stenosis or collapse should lead to another diagnosis, No other cause of increased intracranial pressure present for CSF opening pressure of 200 to 250 mm water.

The clinical presentation of the disease is heterogeneous and often not correlating with the objective findings such as lumbar puncture opening pressure and papilledema. Currently, it is not possible to predict if a patient will respond to medical treatment, or which patients may develop severe permanent visual loss. Papilledema, the only non-invasive objective measurable treatment response, develops with substantial delay compared to intracranial pressure. Therefore, an objective tool indicating permanent optic nerve damage is sorely needed and will help guide treatment and predicting disease outcome. Biomarkers have this advantage as they allow early predicting optic nerve damage. For that reason CSF biomarkers deserve precise understanding for there rule in IIH which is the aim of our study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt, 71515
        • Recruiting
        • Assiut University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- 1. All patients with signs and symptoms of increased intracranial pressure (headaches, nausea, vomiting, transient visual obscurations, papilledema).

2. CSF opening pressure >25 cm water with normal CSF composition.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. localizing neurologic signs, except for unilateral or bilateral sixth cranial nerve palsy.

    2. Evidence of hydrocephalus, mass, infection, structural, or vascular lesion (including venous sinus thrombosis) on imaging.

    3. Patients with IIH who undergo surgical intervention (thecoperitoneal shunt or optic nerve fenestration) 4. Other identified causes of increased ICP.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: patients wit IIH

patient that complains of symptoms of chronic increase intracranial pressure especially visual with absent of organic cause through visual assessment, routine laboratory investigation and brain imaging.

these patients will undergo lumper puncture to assess CSF opening pressure and Neurofilament Light Chain (NFL) and HYpoxia Induced Factor (HIF) both in CSF and blood.

lumper puncture

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relation between lumper puncture opening pressure and specific biomarkers
Time Frame: Baseline

Lumper puncture and measurement of CSF opening pressure (above 20 mm water).

Measurement tools:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test for amount of specific biomarkers both in CSF and serum.

Specific Biomarkers:

  1. Neurofilament light chain(NLC)
  2. Hypoxia induced factor(HIF)
Baseline
Relation between lumper puncture opening pressure and visual disturbance
Time Frame: 3 days
Clinical and visual assessment and CSF opening pressure measurement. measurement tools: Ophthalmoscope Measuring grades of papilledema using the Frisén scale
3 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mahmoud H Ragab, professor, Professor
  • Study Director: Abdelhakeem A Essa, Ass. prof., Assistant Professor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 20, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2022

First Posted (Estimate)

December 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intracranial Hypertension

Clinical Trials on lumper puncture

Subscribe