- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05649930
Effect of Functional Power Training on Calf Muscle Length and Strength in Children With Spastic Paresis (MegaMuscle)
Effect of Functional Power Training on Muscle Morphology and Strength of the Medial Gastrocnemius in Children With Spastic Paresis
Spastic paresis (SP) is a common motor condition in children and is often caused by cerebral palsy. Skeletal muscles develop differently in children with SP due to brain damage in early development; muscle strength and muscle length are reduced compared to typically developing (TD) children. Especially, the calf muscles are affected, which particularly affects their ability to walk and to run, hindering participation in society. There are several treatments aimed to increase the range of motion of the joint by lengthening the muscle, for example botulinum toxin injections. However, these treatments can have a weakening effect on the muscle due to deconditioning from immobilization and due to paralysis.
In rehabilitation centers in the Netherlands functional power training (MegaPower) is offered to children with SP who want to walk and run better. It has been shown that this training improves calf muscle strength and performance during functional walking tests. However, the effect of MegaPower training on muscle morphology (i.a. muscle volume and length) is still unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess the effect of MegaPower training on the muscle morphology of the medial gastrocnemius in children with SP using 3D ultrasonography. It is expected that MegaPower training results in an increase of muscle volume as well as elongation of the muscle belly. Muscle volume could increase due to hypertrophy of the muscle fibers induced by the training, which could elongate the muscle belly length due to the pennate structure of the medial gastrocnemius. A double-baseline design will be applied for this study with three different measurement times (T0-T1-T2) to compare the training period (12 weeks) with a period (12 weeks) of usual care.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Marjolein M van der Krogt, Dr.
- Phone Number: +31 (20)4440789
- Email: m.vanderkrogt@amsterdamumc.nl
Study Locations
-
-
-
Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1056 AB
- Recruiting
- Reade
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Gross Motor Function Classification System I-III
- Children should be able to lie on their stomach for min. one minute
- Children should be able to follow instructions.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Received (one of) the following interventions within six months:
- Casting
- Botulinum toxin type-A injections
- Orthopedic surgery.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Spastic paresis
Children with spastic paresis
|
The training consists of weighted running and walking exercises performed at high-velocity and is given three times a week for 12 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Muscle volume in dm^3
Time Frame: 12 weeks before start training (week -12)
|
12 weeks before start training (week -12)
|
|
Muscle volume in dm^3
Time Frame: At the start of training (week 0)
|
At the start of training (week 0)
|
|
Muscle volume in dm^3
Time Frame: At the end of the training (week 12)
|
At the end of the training (week 12)
|
|
Muscle belly length in mm
Time Frame: 12 weeks before start training (week -12)
|
12 weeks before start training (week -12)
|
|
Muscle belly length in mm
Time Frame: At the start of training (week 0)
|
At the start of training (week 0)
|
|
Muscle belly length in mm
Time Frame: At the end of the training (week 12)
|
At the end of the training (week 12)
|
|
Tendon length in mm
Time Frame: 12 weeks before start training (week -12)
|
12 weeks before start training (week -12)
|
|
Tendon length in mm
Time Frame: At the start of training (week 0)
|
At the start of training (week 0)
|
|
Tendon length in mm
Time Frame: At the end of the training (week 12)
|
At the end of the training (week 12)
|
|
Fascicle length in mm
Time Frame: 12 weeks before start training (week -12)
|
12 weeks before start training (week -12)
|
|
Fascicle length in mm
Time Frame: At the start of training (week 0)
|
At the start of training (week 0)
|
|
Fascicle length in mm
Time Frame: At the end of the training (week 12)
|
At the end of the training (week 12)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Isometric muscle strength of the medial gastrocnemius
Time Frame: At the start of training (week 0)
|
Measured with a hand-held dynamometer in Nm.
|
At the start of training (week 0)
|
|
Isometric muscle strength of the medial gastrocnemius
Time Frame: At the end of the training (week 12)
|
Measured with a hand-held dynamometer in Nm.
|
At the end of the training (week 12)
|
|
Dynamic muscle strength
Time Frame: At the start of training (week 0)
|
Standing heel-rise test on one leg.
Measured in amount of repetitions.
|
At the start of training (week 0)
|
|
Dynamic muscle strength
Time Frame: At the end of the training (week 12)
|
Standing heel-rise test on one leg.
Measured in amount of repetitions.
|
At the end of the training (week 12)
|
|
Functional Strength Measure (FSM)
Time Frame: At the start of training (week 0)
|
Measurement for lower and upper limb functionality.
|
At the start of training (week 0)
|
|
Functional Strength Measure (FSM)
Time Frame: At the end of the training (week 12)
|
Measurement for lower and upper limb functionality.
|
At the end of the training (week 12)
|
|
1-minute-walk-test
Time Frame: At the start of training (week 0)
|
Distance (m) covered in 1 min walking.
|
At the start of training (week 0)
|
|
1-minute-walk-test
Time Frame: At the end of the training (week 12)
|
Distance (m) covered in 1 min walking.
|
At the end of the training (week 12)
|
|
10m Shuttle run test
Time Frame: At the start of training (week 0)
|
Measured in amount of steps reached.
|
At the start of training (week 0)
|
|
10m Shuttle run test
Time Frame: At the end of the training (week 12)
|
Measured in amount of steps reached.
|
At the end of the training (week 12)
|
|
6x15m sprint
Time Frame: At the start of training (week 0)
|
Measured as average time (s) over 6x15 m sprint.
|
At the start of training (week 0)
|
|
6x15m sprint
Time Frame: At the end of the training (week 12)
|
Measured as average time (s) over 6x15 m sprint.
|
At the end of the training (week 12)
|
|
Ankle range of motion
Time Frame: At the start of training (week 0)
|
Maximal dorsiflexion in degrees manually measured with a goniometer.
|
At the start of training (week 0)
|
|
Ankle range of motion
Time Frame: At the end of the training (week 12)
|
Maximal dorsiflexion in degrees manually measured with a goniometer.
|
At the end of the training (week 12)
|
|
Body weight in kg
Time Frame: 12 weeks before start training (week -12)
|
12 weeks before start training (week -12)
|
|
|
Body weight in kg
Time Frame: At the start of training (week 0)
|
At the start of training (week 0)
|
|
|
Body weight in kg
Time Frame: At the end of the training (week 12)
|
At the end of the training (week 12)
|
|
|
Body length in m
Time Frame: 12 weeks before start training (week -12)
|
12 weeks before start training (week -12)
|
|
|
Body length in m
Time Frame: At the start of training (week 0)
|
At the start of training (week 0)
|
|
|
Body length in m
Time Frame: At the end of the training (week 12)
|
At the end of the training (week 12)
|
|
|
Lower leg length in mm
Time Frame: 12 weeks before start training (week -12)
|
Measured from the lateral malleolus and tibial plateau.
|
12 weeks before start training (week -12)
|
|
Lower leg length in mm
Time Frame: At the start of training (week 0)
|
Measured from the lateral malleolus and tibial plateau.
|
At the start of training (week 0)
|
|
Lower leg length in mm
Time Frame: At the end of the training (week 12)
|
Measured from the lateral malleolus and tibial plateau.
|
At the end of the training (week 12)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Medical file information
Time Frame: 12 weeks before start training (week -12)
|
Age, gender, GMFCS-level, medical history
|
12 weeks before start training (week -12)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Marjolein M van der Krogt, Dr., Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MegaMuscle
- 20210088 (Other Grant/Funding Number: JKF/KFA)
- 2021015 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Phelps stichting voor spastici)
- AMS-2021-Innovatiecall-P5 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Amsterdam Movement Sciences)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy, Spastic
-
Suleyman Demirel UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy | Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy | Spastic Diplegia Cerebral PalsyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Lahore University of Biological and Applied SciencesNot yet recruitingSpastic Diplegia Cerebral PalsyPakistan
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentRecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic, Diplegic | Diplegic Cerebral Palsy With Spasticity | Transcranial Magnetic StimilationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Beni-Suef UniversityNot yet recruitingUnilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy
-
Cairo UniversityActive, not recruitingCerebral Palsy Spastic HemiplegicEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy Spastic HemiplegicEgypt
-
Gazi UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic | Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegia | Cerebral Palsy Quadriplegic | Cerebral Palsy, MonoplegicTurkey
-
Wroclaw University of Health and Sport SciencesNot yet recruitingSpastic Diplegia Cerebral Palsy | Spastic HemiplegiaPoland
-
TC Erciyes UniversityEnrolling by invitationCerebral Palsy (CP) | Spastic Diplegia Cerebral Palsy | Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral PalsyTurkey
-
University of LahoreCompletedCerebral Palsy (CP) | Spastic Diplegia Cerebral Palsy | Balance | Gross Motor FunctionsPakistan
Clinical Trials on Functional power training
-
Geriatric Education and Research InstituteCompletedMuscle Weakness | FrailtySingapore
-
Universidad de GranadaActive, not recruitingSarcopenia | Aging | Physical Functional Performance | Muscle Weakness | PatientSpain
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedCerebral PalsyPakistan
-
The University of Hong KongUnknownDevelopmental Coordination DisorderHong Kong
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentRecruitingMotoric Cognitive Risk SyndromeUnited States
-
University of ConnecticutEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...RecruitingCerebral Palsy | Hemiplegia | Children, OnlyUnited States
-
McMaster UniversityCompleted
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingSports Physical TherapyPakistan