Comparison of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block

December 17, 2024 updated by: Alper Kilicaslan, Konya Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi

Comparison of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block with Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty

Adequate pain management following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a key component for patient satisfaction and early ambulation. However, due to the complexity of the innervation of the hip joint, the most appropriate anaesthetic and analgesic technique for THA remains unclear. A femoral nerve block is commonly performed and well established but is associated with motor weakness. Recently, the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block has been introduced as an effective choice which targets the articular branches of the hip. The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a relatively new regional block that has been reported to provide effective analgesia for THA.

The main objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided PENG block technique compared to QLB block in terms of efficacy of pain control and the safety profile after total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The patients will be randomly classified into two equal groups (40 patients each). Group allocation will be done by computer generated random numbers and closed opaque sealed envelopes. The study will be designed to be double blind as all patients and outcomes assessor will be blinded to group assignment.

Patients will be randomized to one of three equal groups:

Group I (n= 40 patients): Patients in this group will receive an ipsilateral single shot of QLB (30 ml of plain bupivacaine 0.25%) after surgery using ultrasonographic guidance.

Group II(n= 40 patients): patients in this group will receive an ipsilateral single-shot of PENG block (25 ml of plain bupivacaine 0.25%) and LFCN block (5 ml of plain bupivacaine 0.25%) after surgery using ultrasonographic guidance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Konya, Turkey
        • Alper Kilicaslan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

36 years to 81 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Physical status according to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA ) I-III

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Younger than 40 years old and older than 85
  • Patients undergoing general anesthesia
  • Allergy or intolerance to one of the study medications
  • Infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture,
  • Patients who do not accept the procedure
  • History of bleeding diathesis
  • ASA IV,
  • Chronic gabapentin/pregabalin,opioid use
  • Hepatic or renal insufficiency
  • Previous operation on the same hip
  • BMI >40

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group QL Block
A convex transducer will be placed in the transverse plane on the flank cranial to the iliac crest to visualise the transverse process of the 4th lumbar vertebra, erector spina, quadratus lumborum and psoas muscles as a 'Shamrock sign'. The needle will inserted in to the fascial plane between the quadratus lumborum and psoas muscles and 30 ml bupivacaine 0.25% will be administered.
Bupivacaine 0.25% injection
Active Comparator: Group PENG+LFCN Block

A linear probe will be placed on the anterior inferior iliac crest in the transverse plane while the patient is in the supine position. After rotating 45 degrees, the pubic ramus, femoral artery and psoas muscle will be visualized. Puncture will be performed in a lateromedial direction until the needle tip reached the plane between the iliopsoas tendon and the iliopubic eminence After a negative aspiration test, 25 ml bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected.

Then, the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block was performed using linear US probe (10-18 MHz).The LFCN will be localized, infero-medially to the antero-superior iliac spine, laterally to the sartorius muscle and 5 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% will be carefully injected.

Bupivacaine 0.25% injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain scores
Time Frame: Changes from baseline opioid consumption at postoperative 0, 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours
Numerical Rating Scale-NRS (0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable painranged from 0 to 10)
Changes from baseline opioid consumption at postoperative 0, 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours
Opioid consumption
Time Frame: Changes from baseline opioid consumption at postoperative 0, 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours
Mean opioid consumption in morphine equivalents
Changes from baseline opioid consumption at postoperative 0, 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quadriceps muscle strength
Time Frame: Postoperative 24 hours period
Quadriceps motor function will be tested with the patient supine and with the hip and knee flexed at 45º and 90º, respectively
Postoperative 24 hours period
Presence of postoperative nausea, vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention, respiratory depression
Time Frame: Postoperative 24 hours period
Presence of postoperative nausea, vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention, respiratory depressio
Postoperative 24 hours period
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Postoperative 24 hours period
Patients asked whether they would choose the same anaesthetic management in a future operation: Yes/No
Postoperative 24 hours period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 10, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

April 21, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021-541

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Total Hip Surgery

Clinical Trials on PENG/LFCN and QL Blocks

Subscribe